Fate of live trees retained in mixed bottomland hardwood stands during the first decade after harvest

Forest Science

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 190-196

  Olson, Matthew G ^a   Gwaze, David ^b   Elliott, Anthony G ^a  

^a MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Basal area retention; Clearcutting; Floodplain forests; Residual stand damage

Indexed keywords

HARDWOODS; HARVESTING; POPULATION STATISTICS;

AESTHETICS; BASAL AREA; CLEARCUTTING; FLOODPLAIN FOREST; RESIDUAL STAND DAMAGE;

FORESTRY;

BASAL AREA; HARDWOODS; HARVESTING; MORTALITY; TREES;

EID: 84922781965     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.13-730     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BUSBY, P. E., P. ADLER, T. L. WARREN, and F. J. SWANSON. 2006. Fates of live trees retained in forest cutting units, western Cascade Range, Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 36:2550-2560.
2. DWYER, J. P., D. C. DEY, W. D. WALTER, and R. G. JENSEN. 2004. Harvest impacts in uneven-aged and even-aged Missouri Ozark forests. North. J. Appl. For. 21(4):187-193.
3. FICKLIN, R. L., J. P. DWYER, B. E. CUTTER, and T. DRAPER. 1997. Residual tree damage during selection cuts using two skidding systems in the Missouri Ozarks. P. 36-46 in Proc. of the Eleventh central hardwood forest conference, Pallardy, S. G., R. A. Cecich, H. G. Garrett, and P. S. Johnson (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-188, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
4. FRANKLIN, J. F., T. A. SPIES, R. VAN PELT, A. B. CAREY, D. A. THORNBURGH, D. R. BERG, D. B. LINDENMAYER, ET AL. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manage. 155:399-423.
5. GUSTAFSSON, L., S. C. BAKER, J. BAUHUS, W. J. BEESE, A. BRODIE, J. KOUKI, D. B. LINDENMAYER, ET AL. 2012. Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: A world perspective. BioScience 62(7): 633-645.
6. GWAZE, D., and A. ELLIOTT. 2011. Cavity trees, snags, and overstory density in a riparian forest in northeastern Missouri. North. J. Appl. For. 28(2):105-109.
7. HARRINGTON, C. A., and D. L. REUKEMA. 1983. Initial shock and longterm stand dynamics following thinning in a Douglas-fir plantation. For. Sci. 29(1):33-46.
8. HODGES, J. D., and E. S. GARDINER. 1993. Ecology and physiology of oak regeneration. P. 184-195 in Oak regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations, Loftis, D. L., and C. E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC.
9. JOHNSON, J. E., G. W. MILLER, J. E. BAUMGRAS, and C. D. WEST. 1999. An assessment of residual stand conditions following shelterwood-withreserves cuts in Appalachian hardwoods. P. 28-33 in Proc. of the Tenth biennial southern silvicultural research conference, Haywood, J. D. (ed.). USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-30, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
10. LAMSON, N. I., and G. W. MILLER. 1982. Logging damage to dominant and codominant residual stems in thinned West Virginia cherry-maple stands. P. 32-38 in Proc. of the Fourth central hardwood forest conference, Muller, R. N. (ed.). University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
11. LAMSON, N. I., H. C. SMITH, and G. W. MILLER. 1985. Logging damage using an individual-tree selection practice in Appalachian hardwood stands. North. J. Appl. For. 2:117-120.
12. MEADOWS, J. S. 1993. Logging damage to residual trees following partial cutting in a green ash-sugarberry stand in the Mississippi delta. P. 248-260 in Proc. of the 9th central hardwood forest conference, Gillespie, A. R., G. R. Parker, P. E. Pope, and G. Rink (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-161, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
13. MILLER, G. W., J. E. JOHNSON, and J. E. BAUMGRAS. 1997. Deferment cutting in central Appalachian hardwoods: An update. For. Landowner 56(5):28-31.
14. MITCHELL, S. J., and W. J. BEESE. 2002. The retention system: Reconciling variable retention with the principles of silvicultural systems. For. Chron. 78:387-403.
15. MOORE, J. R., D. A. MAGUIRE, D. L. PHILLIPS, and C. B. HALPERN. 2002. Effects of varying levels and pattern of green-tree retention on amount of harvesting damage. West. J. Appl. For. 17(4):202-206.
16. MOORE, J. R., S. J. MITCHELL, D. A. MAGUIRE, and C. P. QUINE. 2003. Wind damage in alternative silvicultural systems: Review and synthesis of previous studies. P. 1-8 in Proc. of the International conference on “Wind effects on trees,” Ruck, B., C. Kottmeier, C. Mattheck, C. P. Quine, and G. Wilhelm (eds.). Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
17. NYLAND, R. D. 2002. Silviculture concepts and applications, 2nd ed. Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove, IL. 682 p.
18. NYLAND, R. D., and W. J. GABRIEL. 1971. Logging damage to partially cut northern hardwood stands in New York. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, AFRI Res. Rep. 5, Syracuse, NY. 38 p.
19. REISINGER, T. W., and P. E. POPE. 1991. Impact of timber harvesting on residual trees in a Central Hardwood Forest in Indiana. P. 82-91 in Proc. of the 8th central hardwood forest conference, McCormick, L. H., and K. W. Gottschalk (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-148, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA.
20. RICE, J. A. (ED.). 1994. Logging damage: The problems and practical solutions. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, For. Res. Info. Pap. 117, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Peterborough, ON, Canada. 70 p.
21. ROOT, B. G., A. G. ELLIOTT, and E. W. KURZEJESKI. 2003. Management of riparian forests in North Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Final Rep. P-R Project W-13-R-39, Study 39, Jobs 1, 2, Kirkwood, MO. 52 p.
22. SMITH, H. C., N. I. LAMSON, and G. W. MILLER. 1989. An aesthetic alternative to clearcutting? J. For. 87:14-18.