Forum Non Conveniens: History, Global Practice, and Future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

Forum Non Conveniens: History, Global Practice, and Future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-358

  Brand, Ronald A ^a   Jablonski, Scott R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b The Law Firm of Scott R Jablonski PL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brussels Regulation; Declining jurisdiction; Forum non conveniens; Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements; Judicial discretion; Jurisdiction; Lis pendens; Parallel litigation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922778274     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329278.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (179)

1. Ronald A. Brand, Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. PITT. L. REV. 661 (1999).
2. Lawrence Collins, The High Court of Australia and Forum Conveniens: The Last Word?, 107 LAW Q. REV. 182, 187 (1991).
3. Ellen Hayes, Forum Non Conveniens in England, Australia and Japan: The Allocation of Jurisdiction in Transnational Litigation, 26 U.B.C.L. REV. 41, 53 (1992).
4. Peter Brereton, Forum Non Conveniens in Australia: A Case Note on Voth v. Manildra Flour Mills, 40 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 895, 900 (1991).
5. Peter Brereton, Forum Non Conveniens in Australia: A Case Note on Voth v. Manildra Flour Mills, 40 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 895, 896-97 (1991).
6. Peter Nygh, Voth in the Family Court re-visited: the High Court pronounces forum non conveniens and lis alibi pendens, 1996 AUSTL. J. FAMILY L. LEXIS 10, 20 (July 23, 1996).
7. Richard Garnett, Stay of Proceedings in Australia: A "Clearly Inappropriate" Test?, 23 MELB. U. L. REV. 30 (1999).
8. In Regie National des Usines Renault S.A. v. Zhang, 210 C.L.R. 491 (2001).
9. RALPH FOLSOM & W. DAVIS FOLSOM, Understanding NAFTA AND ITS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS IMPLICATIONS 33 (1999).
10. J.P. MCEVOY, International Litigation: Canada, Forum Non Conveniens and the Anti-Suit Injunction, 17 ADVOCS. Q. 1, 5 (1995).
11. Ellen L. Hayes, Forum Non Conveniens in England, Australia and Japan: The Allocation of Jurisdiction in Transnational Litigation, 26 U.B.C. L. REV. 41, 42 (1992).
12. Genevieve Saumier, Forum Non Conveniens: Where Are We Now?, 12 SUP. CT. L. REV. (2d) 121, 124 (2000).
13. Upper Lakes Shipping Ltd. v. Foster Yeoman Ltd., [1993] 14.
14. Genevieve Saumier, Forum Non Conveniens: Where Are We Now?, 12 SUP. CT. L. REV. (2d) 121, 129-33 (2000).
15. Jeffrey Talpis & Shelley L. Kath, The exceptional as commonplace in Québec forum non conveniens law: Cambior, a case in point, 34 REVUE JURIDIQUE THEMIS 761, 796-97 (2000)
16. Stephen Goldstein, Israel, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 259, 261-74 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
17. R.J. Paterson, Forum Non Conveniens in New Zealand, 13 N.Z. U. L. REV. 337 (1989).
18. PETER NORTH & JAMES J. FAWCETT, CHESHIRE AND NORTH'S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 335 (13th ed. 1999).
19. Arthur T. von Mehren, Theory and Practice of Adjudicatory Authority in Private International Law: A Comparative Study of the Doctrine, Policies and Practices of Common- and Civil-Law Systems, 295 RECUEIL DES COURS/COLLECTED COURSES OF THE HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 326 (2002).
20. Ronald A. Brand, Comparative Forum Non Conveniens and the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments, 37 TEX. INT'L L.J. 467 (2002) copyright 2002
21. Ronald A. Brand. DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
22. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 490-509 (1994).
23. Haimo Schack, Germany, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 189, 190 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
24. Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, Praxis des Internationalen Privat-und-Verfahrens-Rechts [IPRax], 3 (1983) 294.
25. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 504 (1994).
26. Haimo Schack, Germany, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 189 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
27. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 505 (1994).
28. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 503 (1994).
29. Haimo Schack, Germany, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 189, 194 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
30. Haimo Schack, Germany, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 189, 192 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
31. Masato Dogauchi, Japan, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 303 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
32. Masato Dogauchi, The Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from the Perspective of Japan, 3 JAPANESE Y.B. PRIV. INT'L L. 80, 88-90 (2001).
33. Masato Dogauchi, The Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from the Perspective of Japan, 3 JAPANESE Y.B. PRIV. INT'L L. 80, 89 (2001).
34. Masato Dogauchi, The Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from the Perspective of Japan, 3 JAPANESE Y.B. PRIV. INT'L L. 80, 90 (2001).
35. Masato Dogauchi, Japan, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 303, 310 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
36. Trevor C. Hartley, The European Union and the Systematic Dismantling of the Common Law of Conflict of Laws, 15 INT'L COMP. L.Q. 813, 815-21 (2005).
37. Henry Saint Dahl, Forum Non Conveniens, Latin America and Blocking Statutes, 35 U. MIAMI INTER-AM. L. REV. 21, 26 n.25 (2003-2004).
38. Dante Figueroa, Are There Ways Out of the Current Forum Non Conveniens Impasse Between the United States and Latin America?, 1 BUS. L. BRIEF (Am. U.) 42, 44 (2005).
39. Dante Figueroa, Are There Ways Out of the Current Forum Non Conveniens Impasse Between the United States and Latin America?, 1 BUS. L. BRIEF (Am. U.) 42, 44-45 (2005).
40. Dante Figueroa, Are There Ways Out of the Current Forum Non Conveniens Impasse Between the United States and Latin America?, 1 BUS. L. BRIEF (Am. U.) 42 (2005).
41. Dante Figueroa, Are There Ways Out of the Current Forum Non Conveniens Impasse Between the United States and Latin America?, 1 BUS. L. BRIEF (Am. U.) 42, 45 (2005).
42. Winston Anderson, Forum Non Conveniens Checkmated?-The Emergence of Retaliatory Legislation, 10 J. TRANSNAT'L L. & POL'Y 183, 184 n.7 (2001).
43. Dante Figueroa, Are There Ways Out of the Current Forum Non Conveniens Impasse Between the United States and Latin America?, 1 BUS. L. BRIEF (Am. U.) 42, 45 (2005).
44. Henry Saint Dahl, Forum Non Conveniens, Latin America and Blocking Statutes, 35 U. MIAMI INTER-AM. L. REV. 21, 30-31 (2003-2004).
45. Paul Santoyo, Bananas of Wrath: How Nicaragua May Have Dealt Forum Non Conveniens a Fatal Blow Removing the Doctrine as an Obstacle to Achieving Corporate Accountability, 27 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 703, 725-26 (2005).
46. Ms. Janet Reno, available at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Ecuador.htm.
47. Javier Viquez Herrara, (May 20, 1996), available at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Costa_Rica.htm.
48. Teresa de Jesus Bustamante (Aug. 21, 1995), available at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Nicaragua.htm.
49. Don Acisclo Valladares Molina, Attorney General for Guatemala (May 3, 1995), available at http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Guatemala.htm.
50. The Model Law is available in English at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Parlatino.htm.
51. Introduction to Model Law on International Jurisdiction and Applicable Law to Tort Liability, available at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Parlatino.htm.
52. Law for the Defense of Procedural Rights of Nationals and Residents, Guatemala, May 14, 1997, available at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Guatemala.htm.
53. Henry Saint Dahl, Forum Non Conveniens, Latin America and Blocking Statutes, 35 U. MIAMI INTER-AM. L. REV. 21, 48 (2003-2004).
54. Transnational Causes of Action (Product Liability) Act of 1997, the Dominican Republic, Sec. 3, available at: http://www.iaba.org/LLinks_forum_non_Dominica.htm.
55. Gary B. Born, INTERNATIONAL CIVIL LITIGATION IN UNITED STATES COURTS 847-55 (3d ed. 1996).
56. Stephen Goldstein, Israel, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 259 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
57. Stephen Goldstein, Israel, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 259 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
58. PETER NORTH & JAMES J. FAWCETT, CHESHIRE AND NORTH'S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 335 (13th ed. 1999).
59. Joost Blom, Canada, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 121, 130 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
60. Arthur von Mehren, Theory and Practice of Adjudicatory Authority in Private International Law: A Comparative Study of the Doctrine, Policies and Practices of Commonand Civil-Law Systems, 295 RECUEIL DES COURS 326 (2002).
61. Joost Blom, Canada, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 121, 131-32 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
62. Joost Blom, Canada, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 121, 130 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
63. David Robertson, Forum non conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Friction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 417 (1987).
64. Spencer Weber Waller, A Unified Theory of Transnational Procedure, 26 CORNELL INT'L L.J. 101, 101-02 (1993).
65. Genevieve Saumier, Forum Non Conveniens: Where Are We Now?, 12 SUP. CT. L. REV. (2d) 121, 143 (2000).
66. James J. Fawcett, General Report, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 11 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
67. Joost Blom, Canada, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 121, 128-29 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
68. Judd Epstein, Australia, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 79, 86 (James J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
69. Ronald A. Brand, Forum Selection and Forum Rejection in US Courts: One Rationale for a Global Choice of Court Convention, in REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: FESTSCHRIFT FOR SIR PETER NORTH 51, 58-64, 74-87 (James Fawcett ed., 2002).
70. Hague Conference on Private International Law, Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, done at The Hague June 30, 2005, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98.
71. Patrick J. Borchers, Forum Selection Agreements in the Federal Courts After Carnival Cruise: A Proposal for Congressional Reform, 67 Wash. L. REV. 55 (1992).
72. Walter W. Heiser, Forum Selection Clauses in State Courts: Limitations on Enforcement After Stewart and Carnival Cruise, 45 FLA. L. REV. 361 (1993).
73. Jeffrey A. Liesemer, Carnival's Got the Fun ... and the Forum: A New Look at Choice-of-Forum Clauses and the Unconscionability Doctrine after Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 53 U. PITT. L. REV. 1025 (1992).
74. Michael Gruson, Forum-Selection Clauses in International and Interstate Commercial Agreements, 1982 U. ILL. L. REV. 133, 138-47.
75. Anne E. Covey & Michael S. Morris, The Enforceability of Agreements Providing for Forum and Choice of Law Selection, 61 DENV. L.J. 837, 842 (1984).
76. Michael Gruson, Forum-Selection Clauses in International and Interstate Commercial Agreements, 1982 U. ILL. L. REV. 133, 163-85.
77. Willis L.M. Reese, The Model Choice of Forum Act, 17 AM. J. COMP. L. 292, 294 (1969).
78. Walter W. Heiser, Forum Selection Clauses in State Courts: Limitations on Enforcement After Stewart and Carnival Cruise, 45 FLA. L. REV. 361, 397 (1993).
79. Ryan Kelly McLemore, Forum-Selection Clauses and Seaman Personal Injury, 25 TUL. MAR. L.J. 327, 350 (2000).
80. Walter W. Heiser, Forum Selection Clauses in State Courts: Limitations on Enforcement After Stewart and Carnival Cruise, 45 FLA. L. REV. 361, 396 (1993).
81. Ronald A. Brand, Where To From Here? Prospects for a Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments, 16 Int'l ARB. RPT. 38 (Oct. 2001).
82. Ronald A. Brand, Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Draft Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 62 U. PITT. L. REV. 581 (2001).
83. Ronald A. Brand, Introductory Note to the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, 44 INT'L LEGAL MATERIALS 1291 (2005).
84. Hague Conference on Private International Law at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98.
85. Arthur Taylor von Mehren, Recognition Convention Study: Final Report.
86. Ronald A. Brand, Jurisdictional Common Ground: In Search of A Global Convention, in LAW AND JUSTICE IN A MULTI-STATE WORLD: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF ARTHUR T. VON MEHREN 11 (James A.R. Nafziger and Simeon C. Symeonides eds., 2002).
87. Ronald A. Brand, Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. PITT. L. REV. 661 (1999).
88. Ronald A. Brand, Jurisdictional Common Ground: In Search of A Global Convention, LAW AND JUSTICE IN A MULTISTATE WORLD: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF ARTHUR T. VON MEHREN 11 (James A.R. Nafziger and Simeon C. Symeonides eds., 2002).
89. Ronald A. Brand, Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. PITT. L. REV. 661, 664-89 (1999).
90. Arthur Taylor von Mehren & Donald T. Trautman, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis, 79 HARV. L. REV. 1121, 1144-64 (1966).
91. Gregoire Andrieux, Declining Jurisdiction in a Future International Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments-How Can We Benefit from Past Experiences in Conciliating the Two Doctrines of Forum Non Conveniens and Lis Pendens?, 27 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 323, 332-36 (2005).
92. Jacqueline Duval-Major, One-Way Ticket Home: The Federal Doctrine of Forum non conveniens and the International Plaintiff, 77 CORNELL L. REV. 650 (1992).
93. Transnational Civil Procedure Principles Receive Final Approval; Final Action Deferred on International Jurisdiction and Judgments, 26 ALI REPORTER 1 (No. 4, 2004).
94. Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., Michele Taruffo, Rolf Sturner & Antonio Gidi, Introduction to the Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, 33 N.Y.U. J. INT'L L. & POL. 769 (2001).
95. Linda J. Silberman & Andreas F. Lowenfeld, The Hague Judgments Convention -and Perhaps Beyond, in LAW AND JUSTICE IN A MULTISTATE WORLD: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF ARTHUR T. VON MEHREN 121, 130-35 (James A.R. Nafziger & Symeon C. Symeonides eds., 2002).
96. Linda J. Silberman & Andreas F. Lowenfeld, A Different Challenge for the ALI: Herein of Foreign Country Judgments, an International Treaty and an American Statute, 75 Ind. L.J. 635 (2000).
97. ENFORCING FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND UNITED STATES JUDGMENTS ABROAD (Ronald A. Brand ed., 1992).
98. Ronald A. Brand, Enforcement of Foreign Money-Judgments in the United States: In Search of Uniformity and International Acceptance, 67 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 253 (1991).
99. American Law Institute, International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project (Tentative Draft, Apr. 14, 2003).
100. American Law Institute, International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project (Tentative Draft, No. 2, Apr. 13, 2004).
101. Transnational Civil Procedure Principles Receive Final Approval; Final Action Deferred on International Jurisdiction and Judgments, 26 ALI REPORTER 1, 6 (No. 4, 2004).
102. UNIFORM FOREIGN MONEY-JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT, 13-II UNI. L. ANN. 39 (2002).
103. American Law Institute, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Analysis and Proposed Federal Statute (2006), at 132.
104. Harry Flechtner, The Several Texts of the CISG in a Decentralized System: Observations on Translations, Reservations and Other Challenges to the Uniformity Principle in Article 7(1), 17 J. L. & COM. 187, 204 (1998).
105. Harry Flechtner, The Several Texts of the CISG in a Decentralized System: Observations on Translations, Reservations and Other Challenges to the Uniformity Principle in Article 7(1), 17 J. L. & COM. 187, 204 (1998).
106. Ronald A. Brand, Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. PITT. L. REV. 661 (1999).
107. Ronald A. Brand, Current Problems, Common Ground, and First Principles: Restructuring the Preliminary Draft Convention Text, in A GLOBAL LAW OF JURISDICTIONW AND JUDGMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE HAGUE CONVENTION 75 (John J. Barcelo III and Kevin M. Clermont eds., 2002).
108. Harry Flechtner, The Several Texts of the CISG in a Decentralized System: Observations on Translations, Reservations and Other Challenges to the Uniformity Principle in Article 7(1), 17 J.L. & Com. 187, 204 (1998).
109. Hannah L. Buxbaum, Regulatory policy in transnational litigation: the influence of judicial globalization, in FESTSCHRIFT FÜR ERIK JAYME 73, 80 (Heinz-Peter Mansel et al. eds., 2004).
110. Hannah L. Buxbaum, Regulatory policy in transnational litigation: the influence of judicial globalization, in FESTSCHRIFT FÜR ERIK JAYME 73, 81 (Heinz-Peter Mansel et al. eds., 2004).
111. ROBIN M. WHITE & IAN D. WILLOCK, THE SCOTTISH LEGAL SYSTEM 8-34 (1993).
112. Edward L. Barrett, Jr., The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 CAL. L. REV. 380, 387 n.35 (1947).
113. Robert Braucher, The Inconvenient Federal Forum, 60 HARV. L. REV. 908 (1947).
114. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455 (1994).
115. A. GIBB, THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF JURISDICTION IN ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND 212-13 (1926).
116. Robert Braucher, The Inconvenient Federal Forum, 60 HARV. L. REV. 908, 909 (1947).
117. Robert Braucher, The Inconvenient Federal Forum, 60 HARV. L. REV. 908, 909 (1947).
118. John Bies, Conditioning Forum Non Conveniens, 67 U. CHI. L. REV. 489, 494 (2000).
119. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 460 (1994).
120. Kathryn N. Feldman & Susan M. Vella, The Evolution of "Forum Conveniens": Its Application to Stays of Proceedings and Service Ex juris, 10 ADVOCS. Q. 161 (Feb. 1989).
121. David Robertson, Forum non conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Fiction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 411 (1987).
122. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 478 (1994).
123. David Robertson, Forum Non Conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Friction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 411-12 (1987).
124. Rhona Schuz, Controlling Forum Shopping: The Impact of MacShannon v. Rockware Glass Ltd., 35 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 374, 408 (1986).
125. Rhona Schuz, Controlling Forum Shopping: The Impact of MacShannon v. Rockware Glass Ltd., 35 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 374, 381-82 (1986).
126. Rhona Schuz, Controlling Forum Shopping: The Impact of MacShannon v. Rockware Glass Ltd., 35 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 374, 381 (1986).
127. Rhona Schuz, Controlling Forum Shopping: The Impact of MacShannon v. Rockware Glass Ltd., 35 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 374, 383 (1986).
128. Kathryn N. Feldman & Susan M. Vella, The Evolution of "Forum Conveniens": Its Application to Stays of Proceedings and Service Ex juris, 10 ADVOCS. Q. 161, 169 (Feb. 1989).
129. Rhona Schuz, Controlling Forum Shopping: The Impact of MacShannon v. Rockware Glass Ltd., 35 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 374, 386 (1986).
130. Kathryn N. Feldman & Susan M. Vella, The Evolution of "Forum Conveniens": Its Application to Stays of Proceedings and Service Ex juris, 10 ADVOCS. Q. 161, 167 (Feb. 1989).
131. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 478 (1994).
132. Helen Helston, The Spiliada: From Convenience to Propriety, DENNING L.J. 67, 72-73 (1988).
133. Kathryn N. Feldman & Susan M. Vella, The Evolution of "Forum Conveniens": Its Application to stays of proceedings and Service Ex juris, 10 ADVOCS. Q. 161, 174 (Feb. 1989).
134. David Robertson, Forum Non Conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Fiction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 427 (1987).
135. Justin J. Newman, Forum Non Conveniens in Europe (Again), 3 LLOYD'S MAR. & COM. Q. 337, 338 (1997).
136. Wendy Kennet, Forum Non Conveniens in Europe, 54 CAMBRIDGE L.J. 552, 561 (1995).
137. Trevor Hartley, The Brussels Convention and Forum Non Conveniens, 17 Eur. L. REV. 553 (1992).
138. Justin J. Newman, Forum Non Conveniens in Europe (Again), 3 LLOYD'S MAR. & COM. Q. 337, 338-43 (1997).
139. C.G.J. Morse, Not in the Public Interest? Lubbe v. Cape PLC, 37 TEX. INT'L L.J. 541 (2002).
140. C.G.J. Morse, Not in the Public Interest? Lubbe v. Cape PLC, 37 TEX. INT'L L.J. 541, 556 (2002).
141. Ronald A. Brand, Balancing Sovereignty and Party Autonomy in Private International Law: Regression at the European Court of Justice, in LIBER MEMORIALIS PETAR ŠARCIVIC: UNIVERSALISM, TRADITION AND THE INDIVIDUAL, 35, 46-51 (Vesna Tomljenovic, ed., 2006).
142. Paul Beaumont, Great Britain, in JAMES J. FAWCETT, DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 207 (1995).
143. Paxton Blair, The Doctrine of Forum non conveniens in Anglo-American Law, 29 COLUM. L. REV. 1, 22 (1929).
144. Paxton Blair, The Doctrine of Forum non conveniens in Anglo-American Law, 29 COLUM. L. REV. 1, 22-23 (1929).
145. John Bies, Conditioning Forum Non Conveniens, 67 U. CHI. L. REV. 489, 495 (2000).
146. Robert Braucher, The Inconvenient Federal Forum, 60 HARV. L. REV. 908, 925 (1947).
147. Edward L. Barrett, Jr., The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 CAL. L. REV. 380, 394 (1947).
148. John Bies, Conditioning Forum Non Conveniens, 67 U. CHI. L. REV. 489, 496 (2000).
149. Edward L. Barrett, Jr., The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 CAL. L. REV. 380, 389-90 (1947).
150. Edward L. Barrett, Jr., The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 CAL. L. REV. 380, 393 (1947).
151. Edward L. Barrett, Jr., The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 CAL. L. REV. 380, 388-89 nn.40-41 (1947).
152. Edward L. Barrett, Jr., The Doctrine of Forum non conveniens, 35 CAL. L. REV. 380, 395-96 (1947).
153. David W. Robertson, Forum Non Conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Friction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 401 (1987).
154. Douglas W. Dunham & Eric F. Gladbach, Forum Non Conveniens and Foreign Plaintiffs in the 1990s, 24 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 665, 669 (1999).
155. Alexander Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, 16 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 455, 466 (1994).
156. John Bies, Conditioning Forum non conveniens, 67 U. CHI. L. REV. 489, 498 (2000).
157. Jacqueline Duval-Major, One-Way Ticket Home: The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens and the International Plaintiff, 77 CORNELL L. REV. 650, 663-70 (1992).
158. Jacqueline Duval-Major, One-Way Ticket Home: The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens and the International Plaintiff, 77 CORNELL L. REV. 650, 663 (1992).
159. Ronald A. Brand, Due Process, Jurisdiction, and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. PITT. L. REV. 661, 669-87 (1999).
160. David W. Robertson, Forum Non Conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Friction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 408 (1987).
161. Douglas W. Dunham & Eric F. Gladbach, Forum Non Conveniens and Foreign Plaintiffs in the 1990s, 24 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 665, 690-91 (1999).
162. Douglas W. Dunham & Eric F. Gladbach, Forum Non Conveniens and Foreign Plaintiffs in the 1990s, 24 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 665, 675-78 (1999).
163. Joel R. Paul, Comity in International Law, 32 Harv. Int'l L.J. 1, 13-19 (1991).
164. Jordan J. Paust, "Equal Treaty Rights," Resident Status & Forum Non Conveniens, 23 HOU. J. INT'L L. 405 (2004).
165. Russell J. Weintraub, "Equal Treaty Rights": A Response to Professor Paust, 27 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 241, 242-43 (2005).
166. Douglas W. Dunham & Eric F. Gladbach, Forum Non Conveniens and Foreign Plaintiffs in the 1990s, 24 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 665, 666-67 (1999).
167. Jacqueline Duval-Major, One-Way Ticket Home: The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens and the International Plaintiff, 77 CORNELL L. REV. 650, 658 (1992).
168. John Bies, Conditioning Forum Non Conveniens, 67 U. CHI. L. REV. 489, 500-01 (2000).
169. David W. Robertson, Forum Non Conveniens in America and England: "A Rather Fantastic Friction," 103 L.Q. REV. 398, 417-21 (1987).
170. Jacqueline Duval-Major, One-Way Ticket Home: The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens and the International Plaintiff, 77 CORNELL L. REV. 650, 671-72 (1992).
171. William L. Reynolds, The Proper Forum for a Suit: Transnational Forum Non Conveniens and Counter-Suit Injunctions in the Federal Courts, 70 TEX. L. REV. 1663, 1704 (1992).
172. Phillip I. Blumberg, Asserting Human Rights Against Multinational Corporations Under United States Law: Conceptual and Procedural Problems, 50 AM. J. COMP. L. 493 (2002).
173. Matthew R. Skolnick, The Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine in Alien Tort Claims Act Cases: A Shell of its Former Self After WIWA, 16 EMORY INT'L L. REV. 187 (2002).
174. Malcolm J. Rogge, Towards Transnational Corporate Accountability in the Global Economy: Challenging the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in In Re Union Carbide, Alfaro, Sequihua, and Aguinda, 36 TEX. INT'L L.J. 299 (2001).
175. William L. Reynolds, The Proper Forum for a Suit: Transnational Forum Non Conveniens and Counter-Suit Injunctions in the Federal Courts, 70 TEX. L. REV. 1663, 1676 (1992).
176. John W. Joyce, Forum Non Conveniens in Louisiana, 60 LA. L. REV. 293 (1999).
177. Karolyn King, Open "Borders"-Closed Courts: The Impact of Stangvik v. Shiley, Inc., 28 U.S.F. L. REV. 1113 (1994).
178. John W. Joyce, Forum Non Conveniens in Louisiana, 60 LA. L. REV. 293, 310 (1999).
179. Phillip I. Blumberg, Asserting Human Rights Against Multinational Corporations Under United States Law: Conceptual and Procedural Problems, 50 AM. J. COMP. L. 493, 525 (2002).