Partner selection in the mycorrhizal mutualism

New Phytologist

Volumn 205, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1437-1442

  Werner, Gijsbert D A ^a   Kiers, E Toby ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biological market; Cheating; Discrimination; Economics; Partner choice

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FUNGUS; HOST PLANT; MUTUALISM; MYCORRHIZA; SYMBIOSIS;

FUNGI;

MICROBIOLOGY; MYCORRHIZA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; SYMBIOSIS; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; MYCORRHIZAE; PLANTS; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84922777868     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13113     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bever JD, Richardson SC, Lawrence BM, Holmes J, Watson M. 2009. Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecology Letters 12: 13-21.
2. Doidy J, Grace E, Kühn C, Simon-Plas F, Casieri L, Wipf D. 2012. Sugar transporters in plants and in their interactions with fungi. Trends in p/ant Science 17: 413-422.
3. Engelmoer DJP, Behm JE, Kiers ET. 2014. Intense competition between arbuscular mycorrhizal mutualists in an in vitro root microbiome negatively affects total fungal abundance. Molecular Ecology 23: 1584-1593.
4. Fellbaum CR, Mensah JA, Cloos AJ, Strahan GE, Pfeffer PE, Kiers ET, Bücking H. 2014. Fungal nutrient allocation in common mycorrhizal networks is regulated by the carbon source strength of individual host plants. New Phytologist 203: 646-656.
5. Franklin O, Näsholm T, Högberg P, Högberg MN. 2014. Forests trapped in nitrogen limitation - an ecological market perspective on ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 203: 657-666.
6. Ghoul M, Griffin AS, West SA. 2014. Toward an evolutionary definition of cheating. Evolution 68: 318-331.
7. Grman E. 2012. Plant species differ in their ability to reduce allocation to non-beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 93: 711-718.
8. Grman E, Robinson TMP. 2013. Resource availability and imbalance affect plant-mycorrhizal interactions: a field test of three hypotheses. Ecology 94: 62-71.
9. Grman E, Robinson TMP, Klausmeier CA. 2012. Ecological specialization and trade affect the outcome of negotiations in mutualism. The American Naturalist 179: 567-581.
10. Gutjahr C, Parniske M. 2013. Cell and developmental biology of arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 29: 593-617.
11. Hammer EC, Pallon J, Wallander H, Olsson PA. 2011. Tit for tat? A mycorrhizal fungus accumulates phosphorus under low plant carbon availability. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 76: 236-244.
12. Hart MM, Forsythe J, Oshowski B, Bücking H, Jansa J, Kiers ET. 2012. Hiding in a crowd - does diversity facilitate persistence of a low-quality fungal partner in the mycorrhizal symbiosis? Symbiosis 59: 47-56.
13. Johnson D, Martin F, Cairney JWG, Anderson IC. 2012. The importance of individuals: intraspecific diversity of mycorrhizal plants and fungi in ecosystems. New Phytologist 194: 614-625.
14. Johnson NC, Angelard C, Sanders IR, Kiers ET. 2013. Predicting community and ecosystem outcomes of mycorrhizal responses to global change. Ecology Letters 16(Suppl 1): 140-153.
15. Johnson NC, Graham JH. 2012. The continuum concept remains a useful framework for studying mycorrhizal functioning. Plant and Soil 363: 411-419.
16. Kennedy P. 2010. Ectomycorrhizal fungi and interspecific competition: species interactions, community structure, coexistence mechanisms, and future research directions. New Phytologist 187: 895-910.
17. Kennedy PG, Peay KG, Bruns TD. 2009. Root tip competition among ectomycorrhizal fungi: are priority effects a rule or an exception? Ecology 90: 2098-2107.
18. Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Hart MM, Bago A et al. 2011. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333: 880-882.
19. Kiers ET, Hutton MG, Denison RF. 2007. Human selection and the relaxation of legume defences against ineffective rhizobia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 3119-3126.
20. Koegel S, Ait Lahmidi N, Arnould C, Chatagnier O, Walder F, Ineichen K, Boller T, Wipf D, Wiemken A, Courty P-E. 2013. The family of ammonium transporters (AMT) in Sorghum bicolor: two AMT members are induced locally, but not systemically in roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 198: 853-865.
21. Kummel M, Salant SW. 2006. The economics of mutualisms: optimal utilization of mycorrhizal mutualistic partners by plants. Ecology 87: 892-902.
22. Lekberg Y, Hammer EC, Olsson PA. 2010. Plants as resource islands and storage units-adopting the mycocentric view of arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 74: 336-345.
23. Noë R, Hammerstein P. 1994. Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35: 1-11.
24. Parniske M. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6: 763-775.
25. Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD. 1998. Specialization and resource trade: biological markets as a model of mutualisms. Ecology 79: 1029-1038.
26. Selosse MA, Rousset F. 2011. The plant-fungal market place. Science 333: 828-829.
27. Smith FA, Smith SE. 2013. How useful is the mutualism-parasitism continuum of arbuscular mycorrhizal functioning? Plant and Soil 363: 7-18.
28. Steidinger BS, Bever JD. 2014. The coexistence of hosts with different abilities to discriminate against cheater partners: an evolutionary game-theory approach. The American Naturalist 183: 762-770.
29. Thonar C, Frossard E, Smilauer P, Jansa J. 2014. Competition and facilitation in synthetic communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Molecular Ecology 23: 733-746.
30. Verbruggen E, El Mouden C, Jansa J, Akkermans G, Bücking H, West SA, Kiers ET. 2012. Spatial structure and interspecific cooperation: theory and an empirical test using the mycorrhizal mutualism. The American Naturalist 179: E133-E146.
31. Verbruggen E, Kiers ET. 2010. Evolutionary ecology of mycorrhizal functional diversity in agricultural systems. Evolutionary Applications 3: 547-560.
32. Walder F, Niemann H, Natarajan M, Lehmann MF, Boller T, Wiemken A. 2012. Mycorrhizal networks: common goods of plants shared under unequal terms of trade. Plant Physiology 159: 789-797.
33. Weremijewicz J, Janos DP. 2013. Common mycorrhizal networks amplify size inequality in Andropogon gerardii monocultures. New Phytologist 198: 203-213.
34. 2-fixation in angiosperms. Nature Communications 5: 4087.
35. Werner GDA, Kiers ET. 2014. Order of arrival structures arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of plants. New Phytologist. doi: 10.1111/nph.13092.
36. Werner GDA, Strassmann JE, Ivens ABF, Engelmoer DJP, Verbruggen E, Queller DC, Noë R, Johnson NC, Hammerstein P, Kiers ET. 2014a. Evolution of microbial markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: 1237-1244.
37. Wyatt GAK, Kiers ET, Gardner A, West SA. 2014. A biological market analysis of the plant-mycorrhizal symbiosis. Evolution 68: 2603-2618.
38. Xie X, Huang W, Liu F, Tang N, Liu Y, Lin H, Zhao B. 2013. Functional analysis of the novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporter AsPT1 and PHT1 family from Astragalus sinicus during the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 198: 836-852.
39. Xing X, Koch AM, Jones AMP, Ragone D, Murch S, Hart MM. 2012. Mutualism breakdown in breadfruit domestication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 1122-1130.