A computationally efficient approach for watershed scale spatial optimization

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 66, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Cibin, R ^a   Chaubey, I ^b  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuel production; Multi level optimization; Residue removal; SWAT model; Watershed scale optimization

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WASTES; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; OPTIMIZATION;

BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; MULTILEVEL OPTIMIZATION; RESIDUE REMOVAL; SWAT MODEL; WATERSHED SCALE;

WATERSHEDS;

BIOFUEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CROP RESIDUE; MAIZE; OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84922740648     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arabi M., Govindaraju R.S., Hantush M.M. Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42:W10429. 10.1029/2006WR004931.
2. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: model development. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34(1):73-89.
3. Arnold J.G., Allen P.M., Volk M., Williams J.R., Bosch D.D. Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance. Trans. ASAE 2010, 53(5):1433-1443.
4. Bekele E.G., Nicklow J.W. Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms. Water Resour. Res. 2005, 41:W10406. 10.1029/2005WR004090.
5. Brechbill S.C., Tyner W.E. The economics of renewable energy: corn stover and switchgrass. BioEnergy: Fueling America through Renewable Resources 2008, Purdue Extension, ID-404-W.
6. Chatterjee A. Watershed Optimization of BMP Implementation Schemes Using Genetic Algorithms 1997, (M. S. thesis), Pa. State Univ., University Park.
7. Cibin R., Chaubey I., Engel B. Simulated watershed scale impacts of corn stover removal for biofuel on hydrology and water quality. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26:1629-1641. 10.1002/hyp.8280.
8. Cibin R. Optimal Land Use Planning on Selection and Placement of Energy Crops for Sustainable Biofuel Production 2013, (PhD dissertation), Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing.
9. Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., Meyarivan T. Afast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 2002, 6(2):182-197.
10. Deb K. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms 2001, John Wiley, Hoboken, N.J.
11. Engel B., Storm D., White M., Arnold J., Arabi M. Ahydrologic/water quality model application protocol. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43(5):1223-1236.
12. Gitau M.W., Veith T.L., Gburek W.J. Farm-level optimization of BMP placement for cost-effective pollution reduction. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47(6):1923-1931.
13. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning 1989, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass.
14. Haario H., Saksman E., Tamminen J. An adaptive metropolis algorithm. Bernoulli 2001, 7(2):223-242.
15. Holland J. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems 1975, vol. 20. Univ. of Mich. Press, Ann Arbor.
16. Hu X., Eberhart R.C., Shi Y. Particle swarm with extended memory for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium 2003 (SIS 2003), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 2003, 193-197.
17. Joseph J.F., Guillaume J.H.A. Using a parallelized MCMC algorithm in R to identify appropriate likelihood functions for SWAT. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:292-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.012.
18. Kalcic M.M., Frankenberger J., Prokopy L., Chaubey I. An in-depth examination of farmer perception of targeting conservation practices. Environ. Manag. 2014, 10.1007/s00267-014-0342-7.
19. Kennedy J., Eberhart R.C. Swarm Intelligence 2001, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
20. Kennedy J., Eberhart R.C. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ 1995, 1942-1948,.
21. Lautenbach S., Volk M., Strauch M., Whittaker G., Seppelt R. Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 48:98-112.
22. Maringanti C., Chaubey I., Popp J. Development of a multiobjective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45:W06406. 10.1029/2008WR007094.
23. Maringanti C., Chaubey I., Arabi M., Engel B. Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control. Environ. Manag. 2011, 10.1007/s00267-011-9696-2.
24. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Williams J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation 2011, version 2009, USDA Agricultural Research Service and Texas A&M Blackland Research Center, Temple, TX.
25. Rouholahnejad E., Abbaspour K.C., Vejdani M., Srinivasan R., Schulin R., Lehman A. Aparallelization framework for calibration of hydrological models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 31:28-36.
26. Runkel R.L., Crawford C.G., Cohn T.A. Load Estimator (LOADEST)-a FORTRAN program for estimating constituent loads in streams and rivers. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 2004, Chapter A5.
27. Sreekanth J., Datta B. Coupled simulation-optimization model for coastal aquifer management using genetic programming-based ensemble surrogate models and multiple-realization optimization. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47:W04516. 10.1029/2010WR009683.
28. Srivastava P., Hamlett J.M., Robillard P.D., Day R.L. Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a genetic algorithm. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38(3):1021. 10.1029/2001WR000365.
29. Storn R., Price K. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J.Glob. Optim. 1997, 11:341-359.
30. Sudheer K.P., Lakshmi G., Chaubey I. Application of a pseudo-simulator to evaluate the sensitivity of parameters in complex watershed models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26:135-143.
31. Veith T.L., Wolfe M.L., Heatwole C.D. Optimization procedure for cost effective BMP placement at a watershed scale. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2003, 39(6):1331-1343. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04421.x.
32. Vrugt J.A., Robinson B.A. Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:708-711.
33. Williams J.R. Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1975, 11(5):965-974.
34. Wu Y., Li T., Sun L., Chen J. Parallelization of a hydrological model using the message passing interface. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 43:124-132.
35. Yalew S., van Griensven A., Ray N., Kokoszkiewicz L., Betrie G.D. Distributed computation of large scale SWAT models on the grid. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 41:223-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.08.002.
36. Zhang X., Beeson P., Link R., Manowitz D., Izaurralde R.C., Sadeghi A., Thomson A.M., Sahajpal R., Srinivasan R., Arnold J.G. Efficient multi-objective calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model with parallel computing software in Python. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:208-218.
37. Zhang X., Srinivasan R., Liew M.V. On the use of multi-algorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method for multi-site calibration of the SWAT model. Hydrol. Process. 2010, 24:955-969. 10.1002/hyp.7528.
38. Zitzler E., Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 1999, 3(4):257-271.