Nativity and neighborhood characteristics and cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival outcomes among hispanic women in California

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 538-545

  Gomez, Nicole ^a,b   Guendelman, Sylvia ^a   Harley, Kim G ^a   Gomez, Scarlett Lin ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CANCER PREVENTION INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEMOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRANT; PATHOLOGY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK; SOCIAL CLASS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; CALIFORNIA; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; ODDS RATIO; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SEER PROGRAM; SOCIAL CLASS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922738328     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302261     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012.
2. Patel DA, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Patel MK, Malone JM Jr, Chuba PJ, Schwartz K. A population-based study of racial and ethnic differences in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer: analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(2):550-558.
3. SEER STAT fact sheets. Cervix-uteri. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html. Accessed March 20, 2014.
4. Horner MJ, Altekruse SF, Zou Z, Wideroff L, Katki HA, Stinchcomb DG. US geographic distribution of pre-vaccine era cervical cancer screening, incidence, stage, and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(4):591-599.
5. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2011. Accessed October 1, 2014.
6. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4): 417-435.
7. Booth CM, Li G, Zhang-Salomons J, Mackillop WJ. The impact of socioeconomic status on stage of cancer at diagnosis and survival. Cancer. 2010;116(17):4160-4167.
8. Keegan TH, Quach T, Shema S, Glaser SL, Gomez SL. The influence of nativity and neighborhoods on breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival among California Hispanic women. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):603.
9. Coker AL, Desimone CP, Eggleston KS, White AL, Williams M. Ethnic disparities in cervical cancer survival among Texas women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009; 18(10):1577-1583.
10. Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Williams M, Tortolero-Luna G, Martin JB, Tortolero SR. Cervical cancer survival by socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and place of residence in Texas, 1995-2001. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;15(8):941-951.
11. Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Lucci J, Fleming LE, Koniaris LG. Disparities in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer: a problem of access to care. Cancer. 2009;115(1):166-178.
12. Lim J-W, Ashing-Giwa KT. Examining the effect of minority status and neighborhood characteristics on cervical cancer survival outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(1):87-93.
13. McCarthy AM, Dumanovsky T, Visvanathan K, Kahn AR, Schymura MJ. Racial/ethnic and socioeco-nomic disparities in mortality among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New York City, 1995-2006. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(10):1645-1655.
14. Markides KS, Coreil J. The health of Hispanics in the southwestern United States: an epidemiologic paradox. Public Health Rep. 1986;101(3):253-265.
15. Markides KS, Eschback K. Hispanic Paradox in Adult Mortality in the United States. International Handbook of Adult Mortality. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2011.
16. Montealegre JR, Zhou R, Amirian ES, Follen M, Scheurer ME. Nativity disparities in late-stage diagnosis and cause-specific survival among Hispanic women with invasive cervical cancer: an analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(11):1985-1994.
17. Montealegre JR, Zhou R, Amirian ES, Scheurer ME. Uncovering nativity disparities in cancer patterns: multiple imputation strategy to handle missing nativity data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data file. Cancer. 2014;120(8):1203-1211.
18. Gomez SL, Glaser SL. Quality of cancer registry birthplace data for Hispanics living in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(6):713-723.
19. Lin SS, Clarke CA, O'Malley CD, Le GM. Studying cancer incidence and outcomes in immigrants: methodologic concerns. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1757-1759.
20. Gomez SL, Schupp CW, Patel MRE. The Influence of Hispanic ethnicity on nonsmall cell lung cancer histology and patient survival: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer. 2013;119(6):1286-1287.
21. Palloni A, Arias E. Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography. 2004; 41(3):385-415.
22. Portes A, Rumbaut RG. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2006.
23. Cagney KA, Browning CR, Wallace DM. The Latino paradox in neighborhood context: the case of asthma and other respiratory conditions. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(5):919-925.
24. Osypuk TL, Bates LM, Acevedo-Garcia D. Another Mexican birth weight paradox? The role of residential enclaves and neighborhood poverty in the birth weight of Mexican-origin infants. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(4):550-560.
25. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. National Cancer Institute. Site recode ICD-O-3/WHO 2008 definition. Available at: http://seer.cancer. gov/siterecode/icdo3-dwhoheme/index.html. Accessed September 29, 2014.
26. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Race and Ethnicity Work Group. NAACCR guideline for enhancing Hispanic/Latino identification: revised NAACCR Hispanic/Latino Identification Algorithm [NHIA v2.2]. 2009. Available at: http://www.naaccr.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=i6MN9F8c1eU% 3D&tabid=92. Accessed September 29, 2014.
27. Pew Hispanic Center. Demographic profile of His-panics in California, 2009. Available at: http://pewhispanic. org/states/?stateid=CA. Accessed October 7, 2011.
28. Pew Hispanic Center. Survey brief: Latinos in California, Texas, New York, Florida, New Jersey. 2005. Available at: http://pewhispanic.org/files/factsheets/10. pdf. Accessed October 7, 2011.
29. Block G, Matanoski GM, Seltser RS. A method for estimating year of birth using social security number. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118(3):377-395.
30. Gomez SL, Glaser SL. Quality of birthplace information obtained from death certificates for Hispanics, Asians, and Pacific Islanders. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(2):292-295.
31. Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(8):703-711.
32. Keegan THM, John EM, Fish KM, Alfaro-Velcamp T, Clarke CA, Gomez SL. Breast cancer incidence patterns among California Hispanic women: differences by nativity and residence in an enclave. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(5):1208-1218.
33. Liu L, Deapen D, Bernstein L. Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9(4):369-380.
34. Gomez SL, Glaser SL, McClure LA, et al. The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(4):631-647.
35. Chang ET, Yang J, Alfaro-Velcamp T, So SKS, Glaser SL, Gomez SL. Disparities in liver cancer incidence by nativity, acculturation, and socioeconomic status in California Hispanics and Asians. Cancer Epidemiol Bio-markers Prev. 2010;19(12):3106-3118.
36. Chang ET, Gomez SL, Fish K, et al. Gastric cancer incidence among Hispanics in California: patterns by time, nativity, and neighborhood characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(5):709-719.
37. Schupp CW, Press DJ, Gomez SL. Immigration factors and prostate cancer survival among Hispanic men in California: does neighborhood matter? Cancer. 2014;120(9):1401-1408.
38. Patel MI, Schupp CW, Chang ET, Gomez SL, Wakelee HA. How do social factors explain outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer among Hispanics in California? Explaining the Hispanic Paradox. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(28):3572-3578.
39. Cancer Reporting in California System Standards. California Cancer Registry. Data Standards and Quality Control Unit. Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Public Health; 2011; 1(11): 1-602.
40. Howell LP, Gurusinghe S, Tabnak F, Sciortino S. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing. Cancer Detect Prev. 2009; 32(5-6):372-379.
41. Franzini L, Ribble J, Keddie A. Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethn Dis. 2001;11(3):496-518.
42. Abraído-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Flórez KR. Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation?: Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(6):1243-1255.
43. Abraído-Lanza AF, Dohrenwend BP, Ng-Mak DS, Turner JB. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the "salmon bias" and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(10):1543-1548.
44. Massey D, Denton N. Spatial assimilation as a socio-economic outcome. Am Sociol Rev. 1985;50(1):94-106.
45. Charles CZ. The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annu Rev Sociol. 2003;29:167-207.
46. Turra CM, Elo IT. The impact of salmon bias on the Hispanic mortality advantage: new evidence from social security data. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2008;27(5):515-530.
47. Gomez SL, Glaser SL. Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(6):771-781.
48. Pew Hispanic Center. Ranking Latino populations in the states. 2013. Available at: http://www.pewhispanic. org/2013/08/29/ii-ranking-latino-populations-in-the-states. Accessed March 20, 2014.