Nutrient retention associated with phenological features in sparganium erectum stands in a lowland stream

River Research and Applications

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 207-215

  Asaeda, T ^a   Rashid, M H ^a,b  

^a SAITAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b BANGLADESH AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Bangladesh)

Author keywords

Cohort; Ecosystem engineer; Emergent macrophyte; Sedimentation

Indexed keywords

SPARGANIUM ERECTUM;

EID: 84922723923     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.2733     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. APHA. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. America Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation: Washington, D.C.
2. Asaeda T, Nam L. 2002. Effects of rhizome age on the decomposition rate of Phragmites australis rhizomes. Hydrobiologia 485: 205-208.
3. Asaeda T, Son DH. 2001. A model of the development of a periphyton community: resource and flow dynamics. Ecological Modelling 137: 61-75.
4. Asaeda T, Fujino T, Manatunge J. 2005. Morphological adaptations of emergent plants to water flow: a case study with Typha angustifolia, Zizania latifolia and Phragmites australis. Freshwater Biology 50: 1991-2001.
5. Asaeda T, Rajapakse L, Kanoh M. 2010. Fine sediment retention as affected by annual shoot collapse: Sparganium erectum as an ecosystem engineer in a lowland stream. River Research and Applications 26: 1153-1169.
6. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power (Ithaca): New York.
7. Britton NL, Brown A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada, and the British possessions, vol. I. Charles Scribner's Sons: New York.
8. Cook CDK. 1962. Sparganium Erectum L. (S. ramosum Hudson, nom. illeg.). Journal of Ecology 50: 247-255.
9. Ennabili A, Ater M, Radoux M. 1998. Biomass production and NPK retention in macrophytes from wetlands of the Tingitan Peninsula. Aquatic Botany 62: 45-56.
10. Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB. 2004. Horizons in stream biogeochemistry: Flowpaths to progress. Ecology 85: 2369-2379.
11. Gibbs H, Gurnell A, Heppell K, Spencer K. 2012. Macrophytes: ecosystem engineers in UK urban rivers; EGU General Assembly 22-27 April 2012; Vienna, Austria. p 490.
12. Green JC. 2005. Velocity and turbulence distribution around lotic macrophytes. Aquatic Ecology 39: 01-10.
13. Horppila J, Nurminen L. 2003. Effects of submerged macrophytes on sediment resuspension and internal phosphorus loading in Lake Hiidenvesi (southern Finland). Water Research 37: 4468-4474.
14. Jones JB, Jr, Holmes RM. 1996. Surface-subsurface interactions in stream ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 239-242.
15. Jones JI, Collins AL, Naden PS, Sear DA. 2012. The relationship between fine sediment and macrophytes in rivers. River Research and Applications 28: 1006-1018.
16. Koetsier P, McArthur V. 2000. Organic Matter Retention by Macrophyte Beds in 2 Southeastern USA, Low-Gradient, Headwater Streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 633-647.
17. Kozerski HP. 2003. Seston sedimentation in a lowland river (River Spree, Germany): their spatial and temporal variations and controlling factors. Hydrobiologia 494: 51-55.
18. Maazouzi C, Claret C, Dole-Olivier M-J, Marmonier P. 2013. Nutrient dynamics in river bed sediments: effects of hydrological disturbances using experimental flow manipulations. Journal of Soils and Sediments 13: 207-219.
19. Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27: 31-36.
20. Petticrew EL, Kalff J. 1992. Water Flow and Clay Retention in Submerged Macrophyte Beds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 2483-2489.
21. Sand-Jensen K. 1997. Macrophytes as biological engineers in the ecology of Danish streams. In Freshwater biology: Priorities and Development in Danish Research, Sand-Jensen K, Pedersen O (eds.). Gad Publishers Ltd.; 74-101.
22. Sand-Jensen K. 1998. Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 39: 663-679.
23. Schulz M, Kozerski H-P, Pluntke T, Rinke K. 2003a. The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree (Germany). Water Research 37: 569-578.
24. Schulz M, Rinke K, Köhler J. 2003b. A combined approach of photogrammetrical methods and field studies to determine nutrient retention by submersed macrophytes in running waters. Aquatic Botany 76: 17-29.
25. Smith CJ, Wright MF, Patrick, Jr. 1983. The effect of soil redox potential and pH on the reduction and production of nitrous oxide. Journal of Environmental Quality 12: 186-188.
26. Svendsen LM, Kronvang B. 1993. Retention of nitrogen and phosphorus in a Danish lowland river system: implications for the export from the watershed. Hydrobiologia 251: 123-135.
27. Takai Y, Kamura T. 1966. The mechanism of reduction in waterlogged paddy soil. Folia Microbiologica 11: 304-313.
28. Walling DE, Owens PN, Carter J, Leeks GJL, Lewis S, Meharg AA, Wright J. 2003. Storage of sediment-associated nutrients and contaminants in river channel and floodplain systems. Applied Geochemistry 18: 195-220.
29. Wang ZP, Delaune RD, Masscheleyn PH, Patrick WH. 1993. Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57: 382-385.
30. Wigand C, Stevenson JC, Cornwell JC. 1997. Effects of different submersed macrophytes on sediment biogeochemistry. Aquatic Botany 56: 233-244.
31. 2 in Eutric Cambisol under different oxidation-reduction conditions. Acta Agrophysica 28: 39-43.