Coral reef flounders, Bothus lunatus, choose substrates on which they can achieve camouflage with their limited body pattern repertoire

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 629-638

  Tyrie, Elizabeth K ^a,e   Hanlon, Roger T ^b,c   Siemann, Liese A ^b   Uyarra, Maria C ^d,e  

^a WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

^e CIEE Research Station Bonaire   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Background matching; Behaviour; Body patterning; Colour; Crypsis; Granularity analysis; Habitat choice; Preference; Selection

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BODY CONDITION; CORAL REEF; FLATFISH; POPULATION GENETICS; RESOURCE SELECTION; SKIN; SUBSTRATE;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BONAIRE; CARIBBEAN SEA; LEEWARD ISLANDS [LESSER ANTILLES];

ANTHOZOA; BOTHUS LUNATUS; CYANOBACTERIA; PISCES; PLEURONECTOIDEI;

EID: 84922716925     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12442     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen G, Steene R, Humann P, DeLoach N. 2003. Reef fish identification - Tropical Pacific. Jacksonville, FL: New World Publications.
2. Allen JJ, Mäthger LM, Barbosa A, Buresch KC, Sogin E, Schwartz J, Chubb C, Hanlon RT. 2010. Cuttlefish dynamic camouflage: responses to substrate choice and integration of multiple visual cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 277: 1031-1039.
3. Barbosa A, Mäthger LM, Buresch KC, Kelly J, Chubb C, Chiao C-C, Hanlon RT. 2008. Cuttlefish camouflage: the effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking uniform, mottle or disruptive body patterns. Vision Research 48: 1242-1253.
4. Cott HB. 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Methuen.
5. Edmunds M. 1974. Defence in animals. A survey of anti-predator defences. New York, NY: Longman Group, Ltd.
6. Endler JA. 1984. Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 22: 187-231.
7. Eterovick PC, Oliveira FFR, Tattersall GJ. 2010. Threatened tadpoles of Bokermannohyla alvarengai (Anura: Hylidae) choose backgrounds that enhance crypsis potential. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 437-446.
8. Fairchild EA, Howell WH. 2004. Factors affecting the post-release survival of cultured juvenile Pseudopleuronectes americanus. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 69-87.
9. Hanlon RT, Chiao C, Mäthger L, Barbosa A, Buresch KC, Chubb C. 2009. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 364: 429-437.
10. Hanlon RT, Forsythe JW, Joneschild DE. 1999. Crypsis, conspicuousness, mimicry and polyphenism as antipredator defences of foraging octopuses on Indo-Pacific coral reefs, with a method of quantifying crypsis from video tapes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 66: 1-22.
11. Hárosi FI. 1996. Visual pigment types and quantum-catch ratios: implications from three marine teleosts. Biological Bulletin 190: 203-212.
12. Healey EG. 1999. The skin pattern of young plaice and its rapid modification in response to graded changes in background tint and pattern. Journal of Fish Biology 55: 937-971.
13. Hewer HR. 1930. Studies in colour-changes in fish. - Part V. The colour patterns in certain flat fish and their relation to the environment. Journal of the Linnean Society of Zoology 37: 493-513.
14. Humann P, DeLoach N. 2002. Reef creature identification: Florida, Caribbean, Bahamas. Jacksonville, FL: New World Publications.
15. Humann P, DeLoach N. 2007. Reef fish behavior: Florida, Caribbean, Bahamas. Jacksonville, FL: New World Publications.
16. Kang CK, Moon JY, Lee SI, Jablonski PG. 2012. Camouflage through an active choice of a resting spot and body orientation in moths. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 1695-1702.
17. Kelman EJ, Tiptus P, Osorio D. 2006. Juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) produce camouflage by flexibly combining two separate patterns. Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 3288-3292.
18. Kettlewell HBD, Conn DLT. 1977. Further background choice experiments on cryptic Lepidoptera. Journal of Zoology 181: 371-376.
19. Kjernsmo K, Merilaita S. 2012. Background choice as an anti-predator strategy: the roles of background matching and visual complexity in the habitat choice of the least killifish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 279: 4192-4198.
20. Konstantinou H, Shen DC. 1994. The social and reproductive behavior of the eyed flounder, Bothus ocellatus, with notes on the spawning of Bothus lunatus and Bothus ellipticus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 44/4: 311-324.
21. Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL. 1993. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. London: Chapman & Hall.
22. Marshall J, Johnsen S. 2011. Camouflage in marine fish. In: Stevens M, Merilaita S, eds. Animal camouflage: mechanisms and functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 186-211.
23. Mast SO. 1914. Changes in shade, color, and pattern in fishes and their bearing on the problems of adaptation and behavior, with especial reference to the flounders Paralichthys and Ancylopsetta. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 34: 173-238.
24. Matsuda K, Torisawa S, Hiraishi T, Yamamoto K. 2008. Comparison of visual acuity and visual axis of three flatfish species with different ecotypes. Fisheries Science 74: 562-572.
25. McLoughlin PD, Walton LR, Cluff HD, Paquet C, Ramsay MA. 2004. Hierarchical habitat selection by tundra wolves. Journal of Mammalogy 85: 576-580.
26. Ramachandran VS, Tyler CW, Gregory RL, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Duensing S, Pillsbury C, Ramachandran C. 1996. Rapid adaptive camouflage in tropical flounders. Nature 379: 815-818.
27. Randall JE. 1967. Food habits of reef fishes of West Indies. Studies in Tropical Oceanography 5: 665-847.
28. Rodgers GM, Gladman NW, Corless HF, Morrell LJ. 2013. Costs of colour change in fish: food intake and behavioural decisions. Journal of Experimental Biology 216: 2760-2767.
29. Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP. 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals, and mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Ryer CH, Lemke JL, Boersma K, Levas S. 2008. Adaptive coloration, behavior and predation vulnerability in three juvenile north Pacific flatfishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 359: 62-66.
31. Ryer CH, Stoner AW, Titgen RH. 2004. Behavioral mechanisms underlying the refuge value of benthic habitat structure for two flatfishes with differing anti-predator strategies. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 268: 231-243.
32. Saidel WM. 1988. How to be unseen: an essay in obscurity. In: Atema J, Fay R, Popper AN, Tavolga W, eds. Sensory biology of aquatic animals. New York, NY: Springer, 487-513.
33. Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. 2010. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 8672-8676.
34. Stevens M, Merilaita S. 2009. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364: 423-427.
35. Stevens M, Merilaita S, eds. 2011. Animal camouflage: mechanisms and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Steward RC. 1977. Industrial and non-industrial melanism in peppered moth, Biston betularia (L). Ecological Entomology 2: 231-243.
37. Stoddard MC, Stevens M. 2010. Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird's eye. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 277: 1387-1393.
38. Stoner AW, Ottmar ML. 2003. Relationships between size-specific sediment preferences and burial capabilities in juveniles of two Alaska flatfishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 282: 85-101.
39. Stoner AW, Titgen RH. 2003. Biological structures and bottom type influence habitat choices made by Alaska flatfishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 292: 43-59.
40. Stuart-Fox D, Moussalli A. 2009. Camouflage, communication and thermoregulation: lessons from colour changing organisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 364: 463-470.
41. Sumner FB. 1911. The adjustment of flatfishes to various backgrounds: a study of adaptive colour change. Journal of Experimental Zoology 2: 409-504.
42. Sumner FB. 1935. Evidence for protective value of changeable coloration in fishes. American Naturalist 69: 245-266.
43. Townsend CH. 1929. Records of changes in color among fishes. Zoologica 9: 321-378.
44. Webster RJ, Callahan A, Godin JGJ, Sherratt TN. 2009. Behaviourally mediated crypsis in two nocturnal moths with contrasting appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 364: 503-510.
45. Zylinski S, Osorio D, Hanlon RT, Marshall NJ. 2011. To be seen or to hide: visual characteristics of body patterns for camouflage and communication in the Australian Giant Cuttlefish Sepia apama. American Naturalist 177: 681-690.