A Reply to “A Replication of “Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment” (National Tax Journal 2011)”

Public Finance Review

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 226-234

  Young, Cristobal ^a   Varner, Charles ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

migration; millionaire; natural experiment; state income tax

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922629992     PISSN: 10911421     EISSN: 15527530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1091142114537896     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Anderson R. G.,Greene W. H.,McCullough B. D.,Vinod H. D.St. Louis, MO: Working Paper 2005-014C, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; 2005:
2. Burman Leonard,Reed Robert,Alm James.A Call for Replication Studies.Public Finance Review. 2010;38:787-93
3. Cohen Roger,Lai Andrew,Steindel Charles.A Replication of ‘Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.’”.Public Finance Review. 2015;43:206-25
4. Gelman Andrew,Stern Hal.The Difference between ‘Significant’ and ‘Not Significant’ Is Not Itself Statistically Significant.American Statistician. 2006;60:328-31
5. Glandon PhillipReport on the American Economic Review Data Availability Compliance Project. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University; 2010:
6. McCloskey Deirdre N.,Ziliak Stephen T.The Standard Error of Regression.Journal of Economic Literature. 1996;34:97-114
7. McCullough B. D.Got Replicability? The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Archive.Econ Journal Watch. 2007;4:326-37
8. Varner Charles,Young CristobalStanford, CA: Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality Working Paper; 2012:
9. Young Cristobal.Model Uncertainty in Sociological Research: An Application to Religion and Economic Growth.American Sociological Review. 2009;74:380-397
10. Young Cristobal,Varner Charles.Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.National Tax Journal. 2011;64:255-84