Comparative studies of augmentation in combined cycle power plants

International Journal of Energy Research

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1201-1213

  Srinivas, Tangellapalli ^a,b   Reddy, Bale Viswanadha ^b  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deaerator; Steam turbine; Supplementary firing; Thermodynamics; Water injection

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES; EFFICIENCY; GAS COMPRESSORS; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS PLANTS; GAS TURBINES; GASIFICATION; NATURAL GAS; OIL WELL FLOODING; STEAM; STEAM POWER PLANTS; STEAM TURBINES; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER INJECTION;

BIOMASS GASIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COMPRESSOR PRESSURE RATIO; DEAERATOR; GAS TURBINE INLET TEMPERATURE; OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY; SUPPLEMENTARY FIRING; THERMAL EFFICIENCY;

GAS TURBINE POWER PLANTS;

EID: 84922627059     PISSN: 0363907X     EISSN: 1099114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/er.3139     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ministry of Power (http://powerin.nic.in).
2. Horlock JH. Combined Power Plants. Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1992.
3. Srinivas T, Reddy BV, Gupta AVSSKS. Biomass fueled integrated power and refrigeration system. Journal of Power and Energy, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A 2011; 225(3):249-258.
4. Srinivas T, Reddy BV, Gupta AVSSKS. Parametric simulation of combined cycle power plant: A case study. International Journal of Thermodynamics 2011; 14(1):29-36.
5. Srinivas T. Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of a dual pressure reheat combined power cycle. Sadhana 2010; 35(5):597-608.
6. Bassily AM. Analysis and cost optimization of the triple-pressure steam-reheat gas-reheat gas-recuperated combined power cycle. International Journal of Energy Research 2008; 32(2):116-134.
7. Srinivas T. Study of a deaerator location in triple pressure-reheat combined power cycle. Energy 2009; 34(9):1364-1371.
8. Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV. Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of multi-pressure heat recovery steam generator in combined power cycle. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 2008; 67(10):827-834.
9. Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV. Carbon dioxide emission reduction from combined cycle with partial oxidation of natural gas. Energy for Sustainable Development, International Energy Initiative 2009; 13(1):33-37.
10. Paepe MD, Dick E. Cycle improvements to steam injected gas turbines. International Journal of Energy Research 2000; 24(12):1081-1107.
11. Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV. Sensitivity analysis of STIG based combined cycle with dual pressure HRSG. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2008; 47(9):1226-1234.
12. Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV. Parametric simulation of steam injected gas turbine combined cycle. Journal of Power and Energy, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A 2007; 221(7):873-883.
13. A Datta, S Mondal, Subhas Dutta Gupta. Perspectives for the direct firing of biomass as a supplementary fuel in combined cycle power plants. International Journal of Energy Research 2008; 32(13):1241-1257.
14. 2emissions of an IGCC power generation system. International Journal of Energy Research 2009; 33(7):645-661.
15. Srinivas T, Vignesh D. Performance enhancement of GT-ST power plant with inlet air cooling using lithium bromide/water vapor absorption refrigeration system. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy 2012; 8(1):94-107.
16. Zhao H, Yue P. Study of humid air turbine cycle with external heat source for air humidification. International Journal of Energy Research 2010; 34(6):523-534.
17. Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV, Nag PK. Parametric analysis of a coal based combined cycle power plant. International Journal of Energy Research 2006; 30(1):19-36.
18. Reddy BV, Chui KF, Gnanapragasam NV, Prasad RC. Energy and exergy analyses of a CFB-based indirectly fired combined cycle power generation system. International Journal of Energy Research 2009; 33(15):1309-1320.
19. Pelster S, Favrat D, Spakovsky MR. Thermoeconomic and environomic modeling and optimization of the synthesis, design, and operation of combined cycles with advanced options. ASME Journal for Gas Turbines and Power 2001; 123(4):717-726.
20. Shi X, Che D. Thermodynamic analysis of an LNG fuelled combined cycle power plant with waste heat recovery and utilization system. International Journal of Energy Research 2007; 31(10):975-998.
21. Gallo WR. A comparison between the hat cycle and other gas-turbine based cycles: efficiency, specific power and water consumption. Energy Convers. Mgmt. 1997; 38(15-17):1595-1604.
22. Huang FF, Naumowicz T. Overall performance evaluation of an externally-fired air-turbine combined-cycle power plant based on first-law as well as second-law analysis. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Efficiency, Costs, Optimization and Simulation of Energy Systems ECOS'92, Zaragoza, Spain, June 15-18, 1992.
23. Park YM, Sonntag RE. A preliminary study of the Kalina power cycle in connection with a combined cycle system. International Journal of Energy Research 1990; 14(2):153-162.
24. Cheng DY. Regenerative parallel compound dual-fluid heat engine. US Patent 4, 128, 994, 1978.
25. Rice IG. Stem injected gas turbine analysis: steam rates. ASME J Eng Gas Turbine Power 1995; 117(2):347-53.
26. Borat O. Efficiency improvement and superiority of steam injection in gas turbines. Energy conversion and management 1982; 22(1):13-18.
27. Poullikkas A. An overview of current and future sustainable gas turbine technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2005; 9(5):409-443.
28. Gigliucci G, Donatini F, Schiavetti M. Technical and economic analyses of a hydrogen-fed gas turbine with steam injection and co-generation. International Journal Nuclear Hydrogen Production and Application 2006; 1(1):26-35.
29. Wang FJ, Chiou JS. Integration of steam injection and inlet air cooling for a gas turbine generation system. Energy Conversion and Management 2004; 45(1):15-26.
30. Finckh HH, Pfost H. Development potential of combined-cycle (GU D) power plants with and without supplementary firing. ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 1992; 114(4):653-659.
31. Gnanapragasam NV, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Optimum conditions for a natural gas combined cycle power generation system based on available oxygen when using biomass as supplementary fuel. Energy 2009; 34(6):816-826.
32. De S, Nag PK. Effect of supplementary firing on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 2000; 214(1):53-60.
33. Korakianitis T, Grantstrom J, Wassingbo P. Parametric performance of combined cycle-cogeneration power plants with various power and efficiency enhancements. ASME Journal of Gas Turbines and Power 2005; 127(1):65-72.
34. Bhattacharya A, Datta A. Effects of supplementary biomass firing on the performance of combined cycle power generation: A comparison between NGCC and IGCC plants. Biomass and bioenergy 2013; 54:239-249.
35. Carcasci C, Facchini B. Comparison between two gas turbine solutions to increase combined power plant efficiency. Energy Conversion & Management 2000; 41(8):757-773.
36. Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV. Thermodynamic equilibrium model and exergy analysis of a biomass gasifier. ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology 2009; 131(3):1-7.