Relation between skin micro-topography, roughness, and skin age

Skin Research and Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 69-75

  Trojahn, C ^a   Dobos, G ^a   Schario, M ^a   Ludriksone, L ^a   Blume Peytavi, U ^a   Kottner, J ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Skin aging; Skin micro topography; Skin roughness; Skin surface

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TOPOGRAPHY;

INTER-RATER RELIABILITIES; MEASUREMENT FIELD; MICRO TOPOGRAPHY; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS; SKIN AGING; SKIN SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SKIN SURFACES;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; DERMATOSCOPE; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKIN AGE; SKIN MICRO TOPOGRAPHY; SKIN ROUGHNESS; SKIN SURFACE; TOPOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN; SKIN AGING; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922594639     PISSN: 0909752X     EISSN: 16000846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12158     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Serup J. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systmems. Skin Res Technol 1995; 1: 109-114.
2. Brehler R, Voss W, Müller S. Glove powder affects skin roughness, one parameter of skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 227-230.
3. Choi JW, Kwon SH, Huh CH, Park KC, Youn SW. The influences of skin visco-elasticity, hydration level and aging on the formation of wrinkles: a comprehensive and objective approach. Skin Res Technol 2013; 19: e349-e355. Epub 2012/06/08.
4. Dzwigalowska A, Solyga-Zurek A, Debowska RM, Eris I. Preliminary study in the evaluation of anti-aging cosmetic treatment using two complementary methods for assessing skin surface. Skin Res Technol 2013; 19: 155-161.
5. Yin L, Morita A, Tsuji T. Skin premature aging induced by tobacco smoking: the objective evidence of skin replica analysis. J Dermatol Sci 2001; 27: S26-S31.
6. Hughes MC, Strutton GM, Fourtanier A, Green AC. Validation of skin surface microtopography as a measure of skin photoaging in a subtropical population aged 40 and over. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2012; 28: 153-158.
7. Leveque JL. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin topography. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1999; 12: 103-114.
8. Pena Ferreira MR, Costa PC, Bahia FM. Efficacy of anti-wrinkle products in skin surface appearance: a comparative study using non-invasive methods. Skin Res Technol 2010; 16: 444-449. Epub 2010/10/07.
9. Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1735-1750.
10. Hashimoto K. New methods for surface ultrastructure: comparative studies of scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and replica method. Int J Dermatol 1974; 13: 357-381.
11. el Gammal S, Hoffmann K, Stücker M, Altmeyer P. Imaging methods in dermatology. Hautarzt 1997; 48: 432-450.
12. Pierard GE, Franchimont C, Lapierre CM. Le viellissement, son expression au niveau de la microanatomie et des propriétés physiques de la peau. Int J Cosmet Sci 1980; 2: 209-214.
13. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA, Kollias N, Wiegand BC. Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in organization and at the cellular level. Pediatr Dermatol 2010; 27: 125-131. Epub 2009/10/07.
14. Corcuff P, de Lacharriere O, Leveque JL. Extension-induced changes in the microrelief of the human volar forearm: variations with age. J Gerontol 1991; 46: M223-M227.
15. Guinot C, Latreille J, Mauger E, Ambroisine L, Gardinier S, Zahouani H, Guéhenneux S, Tschachler E. Reference ranges of skin micro-relief according to age in French Caucasian and Japanese women. Skin Res Technol 2006; 12: 268-278.
16. Gao Q, Hu LW, Wang Y, Xu WY, Ouyang NN, Dong GQ, Shi ST, Liu Y. Skin texture parameters of the dorsal hand in evaluating skin aging in China. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17: 420-426. Epub 2011/02/23.
17. Wurm EM, Longo C, Curchin C, Soyer HP, Prow TW, Pellacani G. In vivo assessment of chronological ageing and photoageing in forearm skin using reflectance confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol 2012; 167: 270-279. Epub 2012/03/21.
18. De Paepe K, Lagarde JM, Gall Y, Roseeuw D, Rogiers V. Microrelief of the skin using a light transmission method. Arch Dermatol Res 2000; 292: 500-510.
19. Zou Y, Song E, Jin R. Age-dependent changes in skin surface assessed by a novel two-dimensional image analysis. Skin Res Technol 2009; 15: 399-406. Epub 2009/10/17.
20. Vörös E, Robert C, Robert AM. Age-related changes of the human skin surface microrelief. Gerontology 1990; 36: 276-285.
21. Chu M, Kollias N. Documentation of normal stratum corneum scaling in an average population: features of differences among age, ethnicity and body site. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164: 497-507. Epub 2010/11/09.
22. Andersen F, Andersen KH, Kligman AM. Efficacy of an aluminum oxide scrub cream in the treatment of xerotic skin of the elderly. Exogenous Dermatol 2004; 3: 30-34.
23. Moon J, Yi G, Oh C, Lee M, Lee Y, Kim M. A new technique for three-dimensional measurements of skin surface contours: evaluation of skin surface contours according to the ageing process using a stereo image optical topometer. Physiol Meas 2002; 23: 247-259.
24. Lagarde JM, Rouvrais C, Black D. Topography and anisotropy of the skin surface with ageing. Skin Res Technol 2005; 11: 110-119.
25. Fischer TW, Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Direct and non-direct measurement techniques for analysis of skin surface topography. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 1999; 12: 1-11.
26. Gold MH, Goldman MP, Biron J. Human growth factor and cytokine skin cream for facial skin rejuvenation as assessed by 3D in vivo optical skin imaging. J Drugs Dermatol 2007; 6: 1018-1023.
27. Pierard GE. Instrumental evaluation of antiwrinkle activity of cosmetic products: what's new? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15: 194-195.
28. Kottner J, Schario M, Garcia Bartels N, Pantchechnikova E, Hillmann K, Blume-Peytavi U. Comparison of two in vivo measurements for skin surface topography. Skin Res Technol 2013; 19: 84-90. Epub 2013/01/03.
29. Fujimura T, Haketa K, Hotta M, Kitahara T. Global and systematic demonstration for the practical usage of a direct in vivo measurement system to evaluate wrinkles. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007; 29: 423-436.
30. Seddon JM, Egan KM, Zhang Y, Gelles EJ, Glynn RJ, Tucker CA, Gragoudas ES. Evaluation of skin microtopography as a measure of ultraviolet exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 1903-1908.
31. Battistutta D, Pandey N, Strutton GM, Fourtanier A, Tison S, Green AC, Gragoudas ES. Skin surface topography grading is a valid measure of skin photoaging. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2006; 22: 39-45.
32. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
33. Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 96-106. Epub 2010/12/07.
34. Gao Q, Yu J, Wang F, Ge T, Hu L, Liu Y. Automatic measurement of skin textures of the dorsal hand in evaluating skin aging. Skin Res Technol 2013; 19: 145-151. Epub 2013/01/22.
35. Edwards C, Heggie R, Marks R. A study of differences in surface roughness between sun-exposed and unexposed skin with age. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2003; 19: 169-174.
36. Yaar M. Clinical and Histological Features of Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Skin Aging. In: Gilchrest BA and Krutmann J, eds. Skin Aging. Berlin: Springer; 2006: 9-22.
37. Lagarrigue SG, George J, Questel E, Lauze C, Meyer N, Lagarde JM, Simon M, Schmitt AM, Serre G, Paul C. In vivo quantification of epidermis pigmentation and dermis papilla density with reflectance confocal microscopy: variations with age and skin phototype. Exp Dermatol 2012; 21: 281-286. Epub 2012/03/16.
38. Manuskiatti W, Schwindt DA, Maibach HI. Influence of age, anatomic site and race on skin roughness and scaliness. Dermatology 1998; 196: 401-407.
39. Grove GL, Kligman AM. Age-associated changes in human epidermal cell renewal. J Gerontol 1983; 38: 137-142.
40. Tronnier H, Wiebusch M, Heinrich U. Change in skin physiological parameters in space-report on and results of the first study on man. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2008; 21: 283-292. Epub 2008/07/30.
41. Kautzky F, Dahm MW, Drosner M, Köhler LD, Vogt HJ, Borelli S. Direct profilometry of the skin: its reproducibility and variability. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1995; 5: 15-23.