Outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era: An analysis from the BCIS database (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society)

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1374-1385

  Kunadian, Vijay ^a,b   Qiu, Weiliang ^c   Ludman, Peter ^d   Redwood, Simon ^e   Curzen, Nick ^f,g   Stables, Rodney ^h   Gunn, Julian ⁱ   Gershlick, Anthony ^j  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^h LIVERPOOL HEART AND CHEST HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^j GLENFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Cardiogenic shock; Mortality; Primary angioplasty

Indexed keywords

ABCIXIMAB;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVERSION; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART BLOCK; HEART INFARCTION; HEART TAMPONADE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STENT THROMBOSIS; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84922561183     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Godfrey E, et al., for the SHOCK Trial Study Group. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK: an international randomized trial of emergency PTCA/CABG-trial design. Am Heart J 1999;137:313-21.
2. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al., for the SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999;341: 625-34.
3. Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, et al., for the NRMI Investigators. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2005;294:448-54.
4. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C, Gore JM. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1162-8.
5. Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Stebbins AL, et al., for the TRIUMPH Investigators. Effect of tilarginine acetate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: the TRIUMPH randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297: 1657-66.
6. Ludman PF. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom. Heart 2011;97:1293-7.
7. Rubin D. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
8. Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, et al. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J 2012;33: 2535-43.
9. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, et al. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000590.
10. Awad HH, Anderson FA Jr., Gore JM, Goodman SG, Goldberg RJ. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Am Heart J 2012;163:963-71.
11. Tomassini F, Gagnor A, Migliardi A, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: predictors of long-term survival. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78: 505-11.
12. Gasior M, Pres D, Gierlotka M, et al. The influence of diabetes on in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the PL-ACS registry. Kardiol Pol 2012; 70:1215-24.
13. Shindler DM, Palmeri ST, Antonelli TA, et al. Diabetes mellitus in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36 Suppl A: 1097-103.
14. Knafelj R, Radsel P, Ploj T, Noc M. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention and mild induced hypothermia in comatose survivors of ventricular fibrillation with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Resuscitation 2007;74:227-34.
15. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al., for the IABP-SHOCK II Investigators. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287-96.
16. Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Hauptmann KE, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry. Clin Res Cardiol 2013;102:223-7.
17. Romeo F, Acconcia MC, Sergi D, et al. The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2013;165:679-92.
18. White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation 2005; 112:1992-2001.
19. Wong SC, Sanborn T, Sleeper LA, et al. Angiographic findings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36 Suppl A: 1077-83.
20. Hoebers LP, Vis MM, Claessen BE, et al. The impact of multivessel disease with and without a co-existing chronic total occlusion on short- and long-term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with and without cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2013;15:425-32.
21. Ludman P. BCIS Audit Returns January 2011 to December 2011, Slide 152. 2011. Available at: www.bcis.org.uk. Accessed November 7, 2014.