Eco-evolutionary experience in novel species interactions

Ecology Letters

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 236-245

  Saul, Wolf Christian ^a,b,c   Jeschke, Jonathan M ^a,b,c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES   (Germany)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alien species; Anthropocene; Ecological novelty; Ecological similarity; Introduced species; Invasibility; Invasiveness; Management; Na vet ; Steady state satiation equation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; HUMAN ACTIVITY; IDENTIFICATION KEY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIBILITY; NEW SPECIES; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVOLUTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; RISK;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES; ECOSYSTEM; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RISK;

EID: 84922551467     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12408     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Agosta, S.J. (2006). On ecological fitting, plant-insect associations, herbivore host shifts, and host plant selection. Oikos, 114, 556-565.
2. Alexander, M.E., Dick, J.T.A., Weyl, O.L.F., Robinson, T.B. & Richardson, D.M. (2014). Existing and emerging high impact invasive species are characterized by higher functional responses than natives. Biol. Lett., 10, 20130946.
3. Alpert, P. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biol. Invasions, 8, 1523-1534.
4. Atkinson, I.A.E. (2006). Introduced mammals in a new environment. In Biological Invasions in New Zealand. (eds Allen, R.B., Lee, W.G.). Springer, Berlin, pp. 49-66.
5. Begon, M., Townsend, C.R. & Harper, J.L. (2006). Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA.
6. Bezemer, T.M., Harvey, J.A. & Cronin, J.T. (2014). Response of native insect communities to invasive plants. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 59, 119-141.
7. Blackburn, T.M., Essl, F., Evans, T., Hulme, P.E., Jeschke, J.M., Kühn, I. et al. (2014). A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol., 12, e1001850.
8. Blackwell, G.L. (2005). Another world: the composition and consequences of the introduced mammal fauna of New Zealand. Aust. Zool., 33, 108-118.
9. Blossey, B. & Nötzold, R. (1995). Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol., 83, 887-889.
10. Callaway, R.M. & Aschehoug, E.T. (2000). Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science, 290, 521-523.
11. Carlsson, N.O.L., Sarnelle, O. & Strayer, D.L. (2009). Native predators and exotic prey - an acquired taste? Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 525-532.
12. Carrasco, L.R., Mumford, J.D., MacLeod, A., Knight, J.D. & Baker, R.H.A. (2010). Comprehensive bioeconomic modelling of multiple harmful non-indigenous species. Ecol. Econ., 69, 1303-1312.
13. Carroll, S.P., Loye, J.E., Dingle, H., Mathieson, M., Famula, T.R. & Zalucki, M.P. (2005). And the beak shall inherit - evolution in response to invasion. Ecol. Lett., 8, 944-951.
14. Carthey, A.J.R. & Banks, P.B. (2012). When does an alien become a native species? A vulnerable native mammal recognizes and responds to its long-term alien predator. PLoS ONE, 7, e31804.
15. Carthey, A.J.R. & Banks, P.B. (2014). Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence. Biol. Rev., 89, 932-949.
16. Colautti, R.I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I.A. & MacIsaac, H.J. (2004). Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett., 7, 721-733.
17. Cox, G.W. (2004). Alien Species and Evolution: The Evolutionary Ecology of Exotic Plants, Animals, Microbes, and Interacting Native Species. Island Press, Washington, DC.
18. Cox, J.G. & Lima, S.L. (2006). Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 674-680.
19. D'Antonio, C.M. & Vitousek, P.M. (1992). Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 23, 63-87.
20. Davis, M.A., Thompson, K. & Grime, J.P. (2001). Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology. Diversity Distrib., 7, 97-102.
21. Davis, M.A., Chew, M.K., Hobbs, R.J., Lugo, A.E., Ewel, J.J., Vermeij, G.J. et al. (2011). Don't judge species on their origins. Nature, 474, 153-154.
22. Desurmont, G.A., Harvey, J., van Dam, N.M., Cristescu, S.M., Schiestl, F.P., Cozzolino, S. et al. (2014). Alien interference: disruption of infochemical networks by invasive insect herbivores. Plant, Cell Environ., 37, 1854-1865.
23. Dick, J.T.A., Gallagher, K., Avlijas, S., Clarke, H.C., Lewis, S.E., Leung, S. et al. (2013). Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses. Biol. Invasions, 15, 837-846.
24. Dick, J.T.A., Alexander, M.E., Jeschke, J.M., Ricciardi, A., MacIsaac, H.J., Robinson, T.B. et al. (2014). Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach. Biol. Invasions, 16, 735-753.
25. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2013). Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals. EFSA J., 11, 3200.
26. Ewing, C. (2009). Flightlessness. In Encyclopedia of Islands. (eds Gillespie, R.G., Clague, D.A.). University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 311-318.
27. Facon, B., Genton, B.J., Shykoff, J., Jarne, P., Estoup, A. & David, P. (2006). A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 130-135.
28. Forabosco, F., Löhmus, M., Rydhmer, L. & Sundström, L.F. (2013). Genetically modified farm animals and fish in agriculture: a review. Livest. Sci., 153, 1-9.
29. Forister, M.L. & Wilson, J.S. (2013). The population ecology of novel plant-herbivore interactions. Oikos, 122, 657-666.
30. Fritts, T.H. & Rodda, G.H. (1998). The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 113-140.
31. Gould, S.J. & Vrba, E.S. (1982). Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4-15.
32. Haddaway, N.R., Wilcox, R.H., Heptonstall, R.E.A., Griffiths, H.M., Mortimer, R.J.G., Christmas, M. et al. (2012). Predatory functional response and prey choice identify predation differences between native/invasive and parasitised/unparasitised crayfish. PLoS ONE, 7, e32229.
33. Harvey, J.A., Biere, A., Fortuna, T., Vet, L.E.M., Engelkes, T., Morrien, E. et al. (2010). Ecological fits, mis-fits and lotteries involving insect herbivores on the invasive plant, Bunias orientalis. Biol. Invasions, 12, 3045-3059.
34. Heger, T., Saul, W.-C. & Trepl, L. (2013). What biological invasions 'are' is a matter of perspective. J. Nat. Conserv., 21, 93-96.
35. Hobbs, R.J., Higgs, E.S. & Harris, J.A. (2009). Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 599-605.
36. Hobbs, R.J., Higgs, E.S. & Hall, C. (eds.) (2013). Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Oxford.
37. Hokkanen, H. & Pimentel, D. (1989). New associations in biological control: theory and practice. Can. Entomol., 121, 829-840.
38. Holling, C.S. (1959). The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol., 91, 293-320.
39. Hufbauer, R.A. & Torchin, M.E. (2007). Integrating ecological and evolutionary theory of biological invasions. In Biological Invasions. (ed Nentwig, W.). Springer, Berlin, pp. 79-96.
40. Jeschke, J.M. (2006). Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses. J. Theor. Biol., 242, 900-907.
41. Jeschke, J.M., Kopp, M. & Tollrian, R. (2002). Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecol. Monogr., 72, 95-112.
42. Jeschke, J.M., Kopp, M. & Tollrian, R. (2004). Consumer-food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biol. Rev., 79, 337-349.
43. Jeschke, J.M., Laforsch, C. & Tollrian, R. (2008). Animal prey defenses. In: General Ecology. Vol. 1 of Encyclopedia of Ecology (eds Jørgensen, S.E. & Fath, B.D.). Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 189-194.
44. Jeschke, J.M., Keesing, F. & Ostfeld, R.S. (2013). Novel organisms: comparing invasive species, GMOs, and emerging pathogens. Ambio, 42, 541-548.
45. Jeschke, J.M., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T.M., Dick, J.T.A., Essl, F., Evans, T. et al. (2014). Defining the impact of non-native species. Conserv. Biol., 28, 1188-1194.
46. Kondoh, M. (2006). Contact experience, alien-native interactions, and their community consequences: a theoretical consideration on the role of adaptation in biological invasions. In Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology. (eds Cadotte, M.W., McMahon, S.M., Fukami, T.). Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 225-242.
47. Kueffer, C. (2014). Ecological novelty: towards an interdisciplinary understanding of ecological change in the Anthropocene. In: Grounding Global Climate Change. Contributions from the Social and Cultural Sciences (eds Greschke, H.M. & Tischler, J.). Springer, Berlin, pp. 19-37.
48. Ledford, H. (2013). Transgenic salmon nears approval. Nature, 497, 17-18.
49. Llewelyn, J., Phillips, B.L., Brown, G.P., Schwarzkopf, L., Alford, R.A. & Shine, R. (2011). Adaptation or preadaptation: why are keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii) less vulnerable to invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) than are other Australian snakes? Evol. Ecol., 25, 13-24.
50. Lurgi, M., López, B.C. & Montoya, J.M. (2012). Novel communities from climate change. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 367, 2913-2922.
51. Mitchell, C.E., Agrawal, A.A., Bever, J.D., Gilbert, G.S., Hufbauer, R.A., Klironomos, J.N. et al. (2006). Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol. Lett., 9, 726-740.
52. Norbury, G., Byrom, A., Pech, R., Smith, J., Clarke, D., Anderson, D. et al. (2013). Invasive mammals and habitat modification interact to generate unforeseen outcomes for indigenous fauna. Ecol. Appl., 23, 1707-1721.
53. Oke, K.B., Westley, P.A.H., Moreau, D.T.R. & Fleming, I.A. (2013). Hybridization between genetically modified Atlantic salmon and wild brown trout reveals novel ecological interactions. Proc. R. Soc. B, 280, 20131047.
54. Paolucci, E.M., MacIsaac, H.J. & Ricciardi, A. (2013). Origin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers. Diversity Distrib., 19, 988-995.
55. Parker, I.M. & Gilbert, G.S. (2004). The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 675-700.
56. Parker, J.D. & Hay, M.E. (2005). Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol. Lett., 8, 959-967.
57. Parker, I.M., Simberloff, D.S., Lonsdale, W.M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P.M. et al. (1999). Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions, 1, 3-19.
58. Pearse, I.S. & Altermatt, F. (2013). Predicting novel trophic interactions in a non-native world. Ecol. Lett., 16, 1088-1094.
59. Pearse, I.S., Harris, D.J., Karban, R. & Sih, A. (2013). Predicting novel herbivore-plant interactions. Oikos, 122, 1554-1564.
60. Procheş, Ş., Wilson, J.R.U., Richardson, D.M. & Rejmánek, M. (2008). Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 17, 5-10.
61. Richardson, D.M. & Ricciardi, A. (2013). Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide. Diversity Distrib., 19, 1461-1467.
62. Richardson, D.M., Allsopp, N., D'Antonio, C.M., Milton, S.J. & Rejmánek, M. (2000). Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev., 75, 65-93.
63. Roemer, G.W., Donlan, C.J. & Courchamp, F. (2002). Golden eagles, feral pigs, and insular carnivores: how exotic species turn native predators into prey. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 791-796.
64. Salo, P., Korpimaki, E., Banks, P.B., Nordstrom, M. & Dickman, C.R. (2007). Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proc. R. Soc. B, 274, 1237-1243.
65. Saul, W.-C., Jeschke, J.M. & Heger, T. (2013). The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success. NeoBiota, 17, 57-74.
66. Seddon, P.J., Moehrenschlager, A. & Ewen, J. (2014). Reintroducing resurrected species: selecting DeExtinction candidates. Trends Ecol. Evol., 29, 140-147.
67. Sih, A., Bolnick, D.I., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J.L., Peacor, S.D., Pintor, L.M. et al. (2010). Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos, 119, 610-621.
68. Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
69. Strauss, S.Y., Lau, J.A. & Carroll, S.P. (2006). Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett., 9, 357-374.
70. Strayer, D.L., Eviner, V.T., Jeschke, J.M. & Pace, M.L. (2006). Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 645-651.
71. Sundström, L.F., Vandersteen, W.E., Lõhmus, M. & Devlin, R.H. (2014). Growth-enhanced coho salmon invading other salmon species populations: effects on early survival and growth. J. Appl. Ecol., 51, 82-89.
72. Thiele, J., Kollmann, J., Markussen, B. & Otte, A. (2010). Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biol. Invasions, 12, 2025-2035.
73. Thuiller, W., Gallien, L., Boulangeat, I., de Bello, F., Münkemüller, T., Roquet, C. et al. (2010). Resolving Darwin's naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Diversity Distrib., 16, 461-475.
74. Tollrian, R. & Harvell, C.D. (1999). The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
75. Valéry, L., Fritz, H. & Lefeuvre, J.-C. (2013). Another call for the end of invasion biology. Oikos, 122, 1143-1146.
76. Varnham, K. (2010). Invasive Rats on Tropical Islands: Their History, Ecology, Impacts and Eradication. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, Bedfordshire, UK.
77. Verhoeven, K.J., Biere, A., Harvey, J.A. & van der Putten, W.H. (2009). Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naive? Ecol. Lett., 12, 107-117.
78. Webb, J.K., Brown, G.P., Child, T., Greenlees, M.J., Phillips, B. & Shine, R. (2008). A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. Austral Ecol., 33, 821-829.
79. Wiles, G.J., Bart, J., Beck, R.E. & Aguon, C.F. (2003). Impacts of the brown tree snake: patterns of decline and species persistence in Guam's avifauna. Conserv. Biol., 17, 1350-1360.
80. Williams, J.W. & Jackson, S.T. (2007). Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ., 5, 475-482.