Landscape connectivity dynamics of urban green landscape based on morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) and linear spectral mixture model (LSMM) in Shenzhen

Shengtai Xuebao

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 526-536

  Cao, Yi Kun ^a,b   Fu, Mei Chen ^b   Xie, Miao Miao ^b   Gao, Yun ^b   Yao, Si Yao ^b  

^a NARI   (China)

^b CHINA UNIVERSITY OF GEOSCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Landscape connectivity; Morphological spatial pattern analysis; Shenzhen; Urban green landscape

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONNECTIVITY; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MORPHOLOGY; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION;

CHINA; GUANGDONG; SHENZHEN;

EID: 84922513343     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306101563     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects, the 2011 Revision. [2013-06-08]. http:/ / esa.un.org/ unpd/ wup/ index.htm.
2. Imai H, Nakashizuka T. Environmental factors affecting the composition and diversity of avian community in mid-to-late breeding season in urban parks and green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 96(3): 183-194.
3. Alexis A A. Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006, 5(4): 195-201.
4. Vergnes A, Viol I L, Clergeau P. Green corridors in urban landscapes affect the arthropod communities of domestic gardens. Biological Conservation, 2012, 145(1): 171-178.
5. McGarigal K, Cushman S A, Neel M C. Ene. E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical. [2013-06-08]. http:/ / www. umass.edu/ landeco/ research/ fragstats/ fragstats.html
6. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: Towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21(7): 959-967.
7. Magle S B, Theobald D M, Crooks K R. A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecology, 2009, 24(2): 267-280.
8. Zipperer W C, Foresman T W, Walker S P, Daniel C T. Ecological consequences of fragmentation and deforestation in an urban landscape: a case study. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(3): 533-544.
9. Minor E S, Urban D L. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 2008, 22 (2): 297-307.
10. Urban D, Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 2001, 82(5): 1205-1218.
11. Lookingbill T R, Elmore A J, Engelhardt K A M, Churchill J B, Gates J E, Johnson J B. Influence of wetland networks on bat activity in mixed- use landscapes. Biological Conservation, 2010, 143(4): 974-983.
12. Vogt P, Ritters K H, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade T G, Wickham J D. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22(2): 171-177.
13. Soille P. Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verilog, 2003.
14. Wickham J D, Riitters K H, Wade T G, Vogt P. A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 94(3/4): 186-195.
15. Metzger J P, Muller E. Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. Landscape Ecology, 1996, 11(2): 65-77.
16. Metzger J P, Décamps H. The structural connectivity threshold: An hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. Acta Oecological, 1997, 18(1): 1-12.
17. Riitters K H, Wickham J D, O'Neill R, Jones B, Smith E. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology, 2000, 4(2): 3-3.
18. Riitters K H, Wickham J D, O'Neill R V, Jones K B, Smith E R, Coulston J W, Wade T G, Smith J H. Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems, 2002, 5(8): 0815-0822.
19. Civco D L, Hurd J D, Wilson E H, Arnold C L, Prisloe M P. Quantifying and describing urbanizing landscapes in the northeast United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2002, 68(10): 1083-1090.
20. Vogt P, Ferrari J R, Lookingbill T R, Gardner R H, Riitters K H, Ostapowicz K. Mapping functional connectivity. Ecological Indicators, 2009, 9 (1): 64-71.
21. Vogt P, Ritter K H, Iwanowski M, Estreguil C, Kozakd J, Soillee P. Mapping landscape corridors. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7(2): 481-488.
22. Ridd M K. Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995, 16(12): 2165-2185.
23. Lu D S, Weng Q H. Spectral Mixture Analysis of the Urban Landscapes in Indianapolis with Landsat ETM+ Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2004, 70(9): 1053-1062.
24. Wu C S. Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 93 (4): 480-492.
25. Riitters K H, Vogt P, Soille P, Kozak J, Estreguil C. Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology. Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22(7): 1033-1043.
26. Soille P, Vogt P. Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2009, 30(4): 456-459.
27. Ostapowicz K, Vogt P, Riitters K H, Kozak J, Estreguil C. Impact of scale on morphological spatial pattern of forest. Landscape Ecology, 2008, 23 (9): 1107-1117.
28. Chang Q. Green Landscape Changes and Typical Ecological Responses in Urban Areas: A Case in Shenzhen [D]. Beijing: Peking University, 2008.
29. Chang Q, Li M X, Li X, Wu J S. A RS-based gradient analysis of vegetation spatial temporal changes in Shenzhen City, China / / International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering. Nanjing: IEEE, 2011: 29-32.