The Impact of Nurse-Led Clinics on the Mortality and Morbidity of Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 89-95

  Al Mallah, Mouaz H ^a   Farah, Iyad ^b   Al Madani, Wedad ^a   Bdeir, Bassam ^b   Al Habib, Samia ^a   Bigelow, Maureen L ^c   Murad, Mohammad Hassan ^c   Ferwana, Mazen ^a  

^a KING SAUD BIN ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Saudi Arabia)

^b KING SAUD BIN ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Saudi Arabia)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

coronary artery disease; mortality; nurse led clinic

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPLICATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; NURSING; NURSING PRACTICE;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HUMANS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, NURSES';

EID: 84922455875     PISSN: 08894655     EISSN: 15505049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000224     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Lewis R, Neal RD, Williams NH, et al. Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(4):706-723.
2. NdosiM, Vinall K, Hale C, Bird H, Hill J. The effectiveness of nurse-led care in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(5):642-654.
3. Belling RMS, Woods L. Specialist nursing interventions for inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD006597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006597.pub2.
4. Craig SE. Does nurse-led pre-operative assessment reduce the cancellation rate of elective surgical in-patient procedures: a systematic reviewof the research literature.Br J Anaesthetic Recovery Nurs. 2005;6(3):41-47.
5. Page T, Lockwood C, Conroy-Hiller T. Effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics in adult patients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2005;3(1):2-26.
6. Schadewaldt V, Schultz T. Nurse-led clinics as an effective service for cardiac patients: results froma systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011;9(3):199-214.
7. WHO. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Fact sheet no. 317. September 2012. http://www.who.int/cardiovascular-diseases/en/. Accessed November 22, 2012.
8. Clark CE, Lindsay FPS, Rod ST, John LC. Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review andmeta-analysis.BMJ. 2010; 341:c3995.
9. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-560.
10. RevMan [computer program]. Version 5.1. Copenhagen, Denmark: TheNordic Cochrane Center, http://ims.cochrane .org/revman/download. Accessed January 8, 2015.
11. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1-e34.
12. Allen JK, Blumenthal RS,Margolis S, YoungDR,Miller ER, Kelly K. Nurse case management of hypercholesterolemia in patients with coronary heart disease: results of a randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2002;144(4):678-686.
13. Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Thain J, Deans HG, Rawles JM, Squair JL. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care. Heart. 1998;80(5):447-452.
14. Cupples ME, McKnight A. Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients with high cardiovascular risk. Br Med J. 1994;309:993-996.
15. DeBusk R, Charles AD, Robert SH, Albert B, Lynda F. A case-management system for coronary risk factor modification after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(9):721-729.
16. Delaney EK, Murchie P, Lee AJ, Ritchie LD, Campbell NC. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: a 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Heart. 2008;94(11):1419-1423.
17. Goodman H, Parsons A, Davison J, et al. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate a nurse-led programme of support and lifestyle management for patients awaiting cardiac surgery: 'Fit for Surgery: Fit for Life' Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;7(3):189-195.
18. Haskell WL, Alderman EL, Fair JM, et al. Effects of intensive multiple risk factor reduction on coronary atherosclerosis and clinical cardiac events in men and women with coronary artery disease. The Stanford Coronary Risk Intervention Project (SCRIP). Circulation. 1994;89(3):975-990.
19. Jolly K, Bradley F, Sharp S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton Heart Integrated Care Project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group. BMJ. 1999;318(7185):706-711.
20. Khanal S, Omar O, Michael PH, et al. Active Lipid Management In Coronary Artery Disease (ALMICAD) Study. Am J Med. 2007;120(8):734.e711-734.e717.
21. Lapointe F, Lepage S, Larrive L, Maheux P. Surveillance and treatment of dyslipidemia in the post-infarct patient: can a nurse led management approach make a difference Can J Cardiol. 2006;22(9):761-767.
22. Murchie PCN, Ritchie LD, Simpson JA, Thain J. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326:84-87.
23. Wood DA, Kotseva K, Connolly S. Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1999-2012.
24. Newhouse R, Stanik-Hutt J, White K. Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990-2008. Nurs Econ. 2011;29(5):230-250.
25. Bdeir B, Conboy T, Mukhtar A, et al. Impact of a nurseled heart failure program on all-cause mortality [published online ahead of print]. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014.
26. LaurantMRD,Hermens R, et al. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;5: CD001271.