Proving the Unprovable: The Role of Law, Science, and Speculation in Adjudicating Culpability and Dangerousness

Proving the Unprovable: The Role of Law, Science, and Speculation in Adjudicating Culpability and Dangerousness

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-208

  Slobogin, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antisocial behavior; Behavioral science; Culpability; Dangerousness; Testimony

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922446450     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189957.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (345)

1. Michael J. Saks, "The Legal and Scientific Evaluation of Forensic Science (Especially Fingerprint Expert Testimony)," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1167, 1168 (2003).
2. Richard D. Friedman, "Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1047, 1058-59 (2003).
3. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 284-93.
4. Cf. Stephen Morse, "A Preference for Liberty: The Case against Involuntary Commitment of the Mentally Disordered," 70 California Law Review 54, 74-76 (1982).
5. Kenneth S. Brown et al., McCormick on Evidence & 185 at 640-41.
6. John Monahan & David Wexler, "A Definite Maybe: Proof and Probability in Civil Commitment," 2 Law and Human Behavior 37 (1978).
7. Christopher Slobogin, Minding Justice: Laws that Deprive People with Mental Disability of Life and Liberty, 109-11 (2006).
8. Christopher Slobogin, "A Jurisprudence of Dangerousness," 98 Northwestern University Law Review 1, 6-9, 53-58 (2003).
9. Daniel W. Shuman & Bruce D. Sales, "The Admissibility of Expert Testimony Based upon Clinical Judgment and Scientific Research," 4 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 1226, 1228 (1998).
10. Alan Stone, Mental Health and the Law: A System in Transition 33 (1975).
11. Stephen Morse, "Crazy Behavior, Morals and Science: An Analysis of Mental Health Law," 51 Southern California Law Review 527, 620 (1978).
12. Douglas Mossman, "Assessing Predictions of Violence: Being Accurate about Accuracy," 62 Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychiatry 783, 790 (1994).
13. George Dix, "The Death Penalty, 'Dangerousness,' Psychiatric Testimony, and Professional Ethics," 5 American Journal of Criminal Law 151, 175-77 (1977).
14. John Bloom, "Killers and Shrinks," Texas Monthly 64, 68 (July 1978).
15. Hugh Aynesworth, "Texas 'Dr. Death' Retires after 167 Capital Case Trials," Washington Times, Dec. 21, 2003, at A2.
16. Alexander Brooks, "Dangerousness Defined," in Law, Psychiatry & Mental Health Systems 680 (1974).
17. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, "Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness," 3 Cognitive Psychology 430 (1972).
18. Shari Seidman Diamond et al., "Juror Reactions to Attorneys at Trial," 87 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 17, 52-53 & Table 4 (1996).
19. Albert Hoff, "Patuxent and Discretion in the Criminal Justice System," 5 Bulletin of American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 144, 154 (1977).
20. George Dix, "Clinical Evaluation of the 'Dangerousness' of 'Normal' Criminal Defendants," 66 Virginia Law Review 523, 538 (1980).
21. James W. Marquart et al., "Gazing into the Crystal Ball: Can Jurors Accurately Predict Dangerousness in Capital Cases?," 23 Law & Society Review 449, 463 (1989).
22. W. Lawrence Fitch & Debra A. Hamen, "The New Generation of Sex Offender Commitment Laws: Which States Have Them and How Do They Work?," in Protecting Society from Sexually Dangerous Offenders 27, 32.
23. Daniel Krauss & D. Lee, "Deliberating on Dangerousness and Death: Jurors' Ability to Differentiate between Expert Actuarial and Clinical Predictions of Dangerousness," 26 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 113 (2003).
24. Randy Borum, "Improving the Clinical Practice of Violence Risk Assessment," 51 American Psychologist 945 (1996).
25. William Gardner et al., "Clinical versus Actuarial Predictions of Violence in Patients with Mental Illness," 64 Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 602 (1996).
26. Daniel A. Krauss & Bruce D. Sales, "The Effects of Clinical and Scientific Expert Testimony on Juror Decision Making in Capital Cases," 7 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 267, 305 (2003).
27. Daniel A. Krauss et al., "The Effects of Rational and Experiential Information Processing of Expert Testimony in Death Penalty Cases," 22 Behavioral Science and Law 801, 814 (2004).
28. Krauss & Sales, "The Effects of Clinical and Scientific Testimony," 301.
29. Julian V. Roberts, "The Role of Criminal Record in the Sentencing Process," 22 Crime & Justice 303, 316-17 (1997).
30. Jay Apperson et al., "Short-Term Clinical Prediction of Assaultive Behavior: Artifacts of Research Methods," 150 American Journal of Psychiatry 1374 (1993).
31. Earl Rofman et al., "The Prediction of Dangerous Behavior in Emergency Civil Commitment," 137 American Journal of Psychiatry 1061, 1063 (1980).
32. Thomas Litwack & Louis Schlesinger, "Assessing and Predicting Violence: Research, Law and Applications," in Handbook of Forensic Psychology 205, 224.
33. Ralph Reisner et al., Law and the Mental Health System: Civil and Criminal Aspects 763-64 (4th ed. 2004).
34. Gary Melton et al., Community Mental Health Centers and the Courts: An Evaluation of Community-Based Forensic Services 43-55 (1985).
35. David Faust & Barry Nurcombe, "Improving the Accuracy of Clinical Judgment," 52 Psychiatry 197, 202 (1989).
36. Brian L. Cutler & Steven D. Penrod, Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology, and Law 240 (1995).
37. Michael H. Shapiro, "Is Bioethics Broke? On the Idea of Ethics and Law 'Catching Up' with Technology," 33 Indiana Law Review 17 (1999).
38. Wayne LaFave, Criminal Law 426 (4th ed. 2003).
39. Lisa R. Askowitz & Michael H. Graham, "The Reliability of Expert Psychological Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions," 15 Cardozo Law Review 2027, 2040 (1994).
40. Karla Fischer, "Defining the Boundaries of Admissible Expert Psychological Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome," 1989 University of Illinois Law Review 691, 713-17.
41. Robert P. Mosteller, "Syndromes and Politics in Criminal Trials and Evidence Law," 46 Duke Law Journal 461, 479 (1996).
42. Kenneth A. Deffenbacher & Elizabeth F. Loftus, "Do Jurors Share a Common Understanding Concerning Eyewitness Behavior?," 6 Law & Human Behavior 15 (1982).
43. Patricia Frazier & Eugene Borgida, "Juror Common Understanding and the Admissibility of Rape Trauma Syndrome Evidence in Court," 12 Law & Human Behavior 101, 111-15 (1988).
44. Gail S. Goodman et al., "Jurors' Reactions to Child Witnesses," 40 Journal of Social Issues 139, 142 (1984).
45. Stephen Morse, "Crazy Behavior, Morals, and Science: An Analysis of Mental Health Law," 51 Southern California Law Review 527, 554-60 (1978).
46. Barbara Weiner, "Mental Disability and the Criminal Law," in The Mentally Disabled and the Law 693, 721 (Jan Brakel et al. eds., 3d ed. 1985).
47. Richard Rogers & Daniel W. Shuman, Fundamentals of Forensic Practice: Mental Health and Criminal Law 75-76 (2005).
48. American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Standards 336-38.
49. Solomon M. Fulero & Norman J. Finkel, "Barring Ultimate Issue Testimony: An 'Insane' Rule?" 15 Law & Human Behavior 495 (1991).
50. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts, 94-95, 367.
51. Norman Poythress, "Concerning Reform in Expert Testimony: An Open Letter from a Practicing Psychologist," 6 Law & Human Behavior 39, 40-42 (1982).
52. John Petrila, "The Insanity Defense and Other Mental Health Dispositions in Missouri," 5 International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 81 (1982).
53. Kenneth K. Fukunaga et al., "Insanity Plea: Inter-examiner Agreement and Concordance of Psychiatric Opinion and Court Verdict," 5 Law & Human Behavior 325, 327-28 (1981).
54. Wright Williams & Kent S. Miller, "The Processing and Disposition of Incompetent Mentally 111 Offenders," 5 Law & Human Behavior 245 (1981).
55. Virginia Hiday, "Reformed Commitment Procedures: An Empirical Study in the Courtroom," 11 Law & Society Review 651 (1977).
56. Serena Stier & Kurt Stoebe, "Involuntary Hospitalization of the Mentally 111 in Iowa: The Failure of the 1975 Legislation," 64 Iowa Law Review 1284 (1979).
57. Cf. R. C. Howard & Charles R. Clark, "When Courts and Experts Disagree: Discordance between Insanity Recommendation and Adjudications," 9 Law & Human Behavior 385, 394 (1984).
58. Gare Smith & James Hall, "Evaluating Michigan's Guilty but Mentally I11 Verdict," 16 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 77, 94 (1982).
59. Jeffrey Rogers et al., "Insanity Defenses: Contested or Conceded?," 141 American Journal of Psychiatry 885 (1984).
60. Charles Bleil, "Evidence of Syndromes: No Need for a 'Better Mousetrap,'" 32 South Texas Law Review 37, 66 (1990).
61. Dennis J. Devine et al., "Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups," 7 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 622, 689 (2001).
62. Lisa Callahan et al., "The Volume and Characteristics of Insanity Defense Pleas: An Eight State Study," 19 Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 331 (1991).
63. Stuart M. Kirschner & Gary M. Galperin, "The Defense of Extreme Emotional Disturbance in New York County: Pleas and Outcomes," 10 Behavioral Science & Law 47 (2002).
64. Neil J. Vidmar & Regina A. Schuller, "Juries and Expert Evidence: Social Framework Testimony," 52 Law & Contemporary Problems 133, 173 (1989).
65. Regina Schuller, "The Impact of Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence on Jury Decision Processes," 16 Law & Human Behavior 597, 616 (1992).
66. Thomas D. Lyon & Jonathan J. Koehler, "The Relevance Ratio: Evaluating the Probative Value of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases," 82 Cornell Law Review 43, 70 (1996).
67. Nancy J. Brekke et al., "Of Juries and Court-Appointed Experts: The Impact of Nonadversarial versus Adversarial Expert Testimony," 15 Law & Human Behavior 451, 471 (1991).
68. E. Donald Elliot, "Toward Incentive-Based Procedure: Three Approaches for Regulating Scientific Evidence," 69 Boston University Law Review 487, 501 (1989).
69. Hope Viner Samborn, "Changing the Jury Tool Box: ABA Task Force Invites Criticism of Trial Proposals-And Gets It," American Bar Association Journal 22 (Dec. 1997).
70. Shelby A. D. Moore, "Battered Women Syndrome: Selling the Shadow to Support the Substance," 38 Howard Law Journal 297, 301 (1995).
71. Anthony V. Alfieri, "Defending Racial Violence," 95 Columbia Law Review 1301, 1324 (1995).
72. George P. Fletcher, With Justice for Some: Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials 38 (1995).
73. Alfieri, "Defending Racial Violence," 1312, 1314-15.
74. Alfieri, "Defending Racial Violence," 1311.
75. Christopher B. Mueller & Laird C. Kirkpatrick, Evidence 230 (1995).
76. Martha R. Mahoney, "Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation," 90 Michigan Law Review 1, 34-43 (1991).
77. Paul Harris, Black Rage Confronts the Law 274 (1997).
78. Peter Margulies, "Identity on Trial: Subordination, Social Science Evidence, and Criminal Defense," 51 Rutgers Law Review 45, 131 (1998).
79. Richard E. Nisbett & Lee Ross, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment 133-34 (1980).
80. Lori Montgomery, "Teen Guilty of Murder: Urban Theory Not Allowed," Detroit Free Press, 6A (Nov. 12, 1994).
81. Paul Gianelli, "Daubert in the States," 34 Criminal Law Bulletin 154, 155 (1998).
82. Paul Gianelli, "The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later," 80 Columbia Law Review 1997, 1239 (1980).
83. Joseph Sanders et al., "Legal Perceptions of Science and Expert Knowledge," 8 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 139, 149 (2002).
84. Mark P. Denbeaux & D. Michael Risinger, "Kumho Tire and Expert Reliability: How the Question You Ask Gives the Answer You Get," 34 Seton Hall Law Review 15, 52, 59 (2003).
85. Paul C. Gianelli, "The Supreme Court's 'Criminal' Daubert Cases," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1071, 1097-98 (2003).
86. Jennifer L. Groscup et al., "The Effects of Daubert on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in State and Federal Criminal Cases," 8 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 339, 363 (2002).
87. Cf. Lloyd Dixon & Brian Gill, "Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases Since the Daubert Decision," 8 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 251, 269, 277 (2002).
88. Wayne Lafave, Criminal Law 59 (4th ed. 2003).
89. Denbeaux & Risinger, "Kumho Tire and Expert Reliability," 49-51, 56-58.
90. David A. Stoney, "Fingerprint Identification: Scientific Status," in 3 David L. Faigman et al., The Law and Science of Expert Testimony 394-95 (2002).
91. Alfred Biasotti & John Murdock, "Firearms and Toolmark Identification," in 3 Faigman et al., The Law and Science of Expert Testimony 517.
92. Michael P. Risinger, "Handwriting Identification: Scientific Status," in 3 Faigman et al., The Law and Science of Expert Testimony 481.
93. Paul Cassell, "Protecting the Innocent from False Confessions and Lost Confessions -And from Miranda," 88 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 497, 502 (1998).
94. Richard A. Leo & Richard J. Ofshe, "The Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological Interrogation," 88 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 429 (1998).
95. Saul M. Kassin & Katherine L. Kiechel, "The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation," 7 Psychological Science 125, 127 (1996).
96. Gary L. Wells, "Eyewitness Identification: Scientific Status," in 2 Faigman et al., The Law and Science of Expert Testimony 391-422.
97. Henry F. Fradella, "The Impact of Daubert on the Admissibility of Behavioral Science Testimony," 30 Pepperdine Law Review 403 (2003).
98. Jennifer L. Groscup & Steven Penrod, "Battle of the Standards for Experts in Criminal Cases: Police v. Psychologists," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1141, 1153-55 (2003).
99. D. Michael Risinger, "Preliminary Thoughts on a Functional Taxonomy of Expertise for the Post-Kumho World," 31 Seton Hall Law Review 508, 515-26 (2000).
100. http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a6/A6AwardSearch.htm (using keywords "eyewitness & identification," "confessions," and "insanity").
101. David L. Faigman, "The Evidentiary Status of Social Science under Daubert: Is It 'Scientific,' 'Technical,' or 'Other' Knowledge?," 1 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 960, 971-77 (1995).
102. Joseph Sanders, "The Paternalistic Justification for Restrictions on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 881, 940 (2003).
103. Katherine Goldwasser, "Vindicating the Right to Trial by Jury and the Requirement of Proof beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Critique of the Conventional Wisdom about Excluding Defense Evidence," 86 Georgetown Law Journal 621, 636, 639 (1998).
104. Janet C. Hoeffel, "The Sixth Amendment's Lost Clause: Unearthing Compulsory Process," 2002 Wisconsin Law Review 1275, 1316-51 (2002).
105. Barry Scheck et al., Actual Innocence (2000).
106. Arye Rattner, "Convicted but Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and the Criminal Justice System," 12 Law & Human Behavior 283, 289-91 (1988).
107. Cf. Ellen Yankiver Suni, "Who Stole the Cookie from the Cookie Jar? The Law and Ethics of Shifting Blame in Criminal Cases," 68 Fordham Law Review 1643, 1690 (2000).
108. Shari Seidman Diamond et al., "Juror Reactions to Attorneys at Trial," 87 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 17 (1996).
109. Sanders, "The Paternalistic Justification for Restrictions on Expert Evidence," 909-24.
110. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 188-89, 204-08 (2d ed. 1997).
111. Hoeffel, "The Sixth Amendment's Lost Clause," 77.
112. Richard D. Friedman, "Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1047, 1048 (2003).
113. Roger Park, " Daubert on a Tilted Playing Field," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1113 (2003).
114. Joelle Anne Moreno, "What Happens When Dirty Harry Becomes an (Expert) Witness for the Prosecution?," 79 Tulane Law Review 1, 46-53 (2004).
115. Alan Dershowitz, The Abuse Excuse and Other Cop Outs, Sob Stories, and Evasions of Responsibility (1994).
116. Ian Freckleton, "When Plight Makes Right: The Forensic Abuse Syndrome," 18 Criminal Law Journal 29 (1994).
117. Lenore E. Walker, The Battered Woman (1979).
118. Mary Ann Dutton, "Understanding Women's Responses to Domestic Violence: A Redefinition of Battered Woman Syndrome," 21 Hofstra Law Review 1191, 1197 (1993).
119. Susan Murphy, "Assisting the Jury in Understanding Victimization: Expert Psychological Testimony on Battered Woman Syndrome and Rape Trauma Syndrome," 25 Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems 277 (1992).
120. Diane Follingstad, "Battered Woman Syndrome in the Courts," in Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Forensic Psychology 485 (Alan Goldstein ed., 2003).
121. Roland C. Summit, "The Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome," 7 Child Abuse & Neglect 177 (1983).
122. Ann Wolbert Burgess & Lynda Lytle Holmstrom, "Rape Trauma Syndrome," 131 American Journal of Psychiatry 981 (1974).
123. Lisa R. Askowitz & Michael H. Graham, "The Reliability of Expert Psychological Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions," 15 Cardozo Law Review 2027, 2040-44 (1994).
124. Karla Fischer, "Defining the Boundaries of Admissible Expert Psychological Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome," 1989 University of Illinois Law Review 691, 710-26.
125. Chaim Shatan, "Soldiers in and after Vietnam," 31 Journal of Social Science 25 (1975).
126. Chaim Shatan, "The Grief of Soldiers: The Vietnam Combat Veterans' Self-Help Movement," 43 American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 640 (1973).
127. Wally Owens, Case Note, "State v. Osby, the Urban Survival Defense," 22 American Journal of Criminal Law 809 (1995).
128. Douglas R. Richmond, "Bad Science: Repressed and Recovered Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse," 44 University of Kansas Law Review 517, 521 (1996).
129. Peter Arenella, "Demystifying the Abuse Excuse: Is There One?," 19 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 703, 706-09 (1996).
130. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 216-17 (2d ed. 1997).
131. Lawrence B. Kessler, Note, "The XYY Chromosomal Abnormality: Use and Misuse in the Legal Process," 9 Harvard Journal on Legislation 469 (1972).
132. Carolyn Anspacher, The Trial of Dr. Dekaplany 115 (1965).
133. Laurens Walker & John Monahan, "Social Frameworks: A New Use of Social Science in Law," 73 Virginia Law Review 559, 563 (1987).
134. Robert Mark Carney & Brian D. Williams, "Recent Decision: Premenstrual Syndrome, a Criminal Defense," 59 Notre Dame Law Review 253 (1983).
135. Travis H. D. Lewin, "Psychological Evidence in Criminal Cases for Purposes Other Than the Defense of Insanity," 26 Syracuse Law Review 1051 (1975).
136. Judson Fauknor, Annual Survey of American Law Evidence 804-08 (1950).
137. Elizabeth F. Loftus & James M. Doyle, Eyewitness Testimony 36-39, 51-52, 90-94 (1979).
138. Giannelli, "The Supreme Court's Criminal Daubert Cases," 33 Seton Hall Law Review 1071, 1097-99 (2003).
139. Lloyd Dixon & Brandon Gill, "Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Civil Cases," 8 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 251 (2001).
140. Robert G. Badal & Edward J. Suzewski, "Economic Testimony Under Fire," ABA Journal 56 (Nov. 2001).
141. Daniel W. Shuman, "Expertise in Law, Medicine and Health Care," 26 Journal of Health Policy & Law 267, 282 (2001).
142. Henry F. Fradella et al., "The Impact of Daubert on the Admissibility of Behavioral Science Testimony," 30 Pepperdine Law Review 403 (2003).
143. Note, "Developments in the Law: Confronting the New Challenges of Scientific Evidence," 108 Harvard Law Review 1490, 1493 (1995).
144. Veronica Dahir et al., "Judicial Application of Daubert to Psychological Syndrome and Profile Evidence: A Research Note," 11 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 62, 78 (2005).
145. Jennifer L. Groscup et al., "The Effects of Daubert on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in State and Federal Criminal Cases," 8 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 339 (2002).
146. Steven D. Penrod et al., "Expert Psychological Testimony on Eyewitness Reliability before and after Daubert The State of the Law and the Science," 13 Behavioral Science & Law 229, 256 (1995).
147. Scott Woller, "Rethinking the Role of Expert Testimony Regarding the Reliability of Eyewitness Identifications in New York," 48 New York Law School Law Review 323, 324-27 (2003).
148. Richard Bonnie, "Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense," 9 Newsletter of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 6, 7 (1984).
149. David McCord, "Syndromes, Profiles and Other Mental Exotica: A New Approach to the Admissibility of Nontraditional Psychological Evidence in Criminal Cases," 66 Oregon Law Review 19, 66 (1987).
150. Robert P. Mosteller, "Syndromes and Politics in Criminal Trials and Evidence Law," 46 Duke Law Journal 461, 484 n. 77 (1996).
151. Mosteller, "Syndromes and Politics," 486-91, 488-89.
152. Charles P. Ewing, "Psychological Self-Defense: A Proposed Justification for Battered Women Who Kill," 14 Law and Human Behavior, 579 (1990).
153. Stephen J. Morse, "The Misbegotten Marriage of Soft Psychology and Bad Law: Psychological Self-Defense as a Justification for Homicide," 14 Law and Human Behavior, 595 (1990).
154. James Q. Wilson, Moral Judgment: Does the Abuse Excuse Threaten Our Legal System? 89, 90 (1997).
155. Anthony V. Alfieri, "Defending Racial Violence," 95 Columbia Law Review 1301, 1310-12 (1995).
156. George P. Fletcher, With Justice for Some: Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials 38 (1995).
157. Michael S. Moore, "Causation and the Excuses," 73 California Law Review 1091, 1130 (1985).
158. Richard Delgado, " 'Rotten Social Background': Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Defense of Severe Environmental Deprivation?," 3 Law & Inequality 9, 12-13 (1985).
159. Patricia J. Falk, "Novel Theories of Criminal Defense Based upon the Toxicity of the Social Environment: Urban Psychosis, Television Intoxication, and Black Rage," 74 North Carolina Law Review 731, 809 (1996).
160. David Skeen, "The Genetically Defective Offender," 9 William Mitchell Law Review 217 (1983).
161. cf. Michael L. Perlin, The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense 120-28 (1994).
162. Reisner et al., Law and the Mental Health System 533.
163. Scott E. Sundby, "The Jury as Critic: An Empirical Look at How Capital Juries Perceive Expert and Lay Testimony," 83 Virginia Law Review 1109 (1997).
164. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights, Psychiatry Eradicating Justice 8 (1995).
165. Stephen J. Morse, "Crazy Behavior, Morals, and Science: An Analysis of Mental Health Law," 51 Southern California Law Review 527, 604-05, 620 (1978).
166. Stephen J.Morse, "Failed Explanations and Criminal Responsibility: Experts and the Unconscious," 68 Virginia Law Review 971, 1037 (1982).
167. Morse, "Crazy Behavior," 601, 615-16.
168. David Faigman, "To Have and Have Not: Assessing the Value of Social Science to the Law as Science and Policy," 38 Emory Law Journal 1005, 1073-77 (1989).
169. David Faust & Jay Ziskin, "The Expert Witness in Psychology and Psychiatry," 241 Science 31 (1988).
170. Lee Coleman, The Reign of Error 45, 61-64, 86-87 (1984).
171. Alan A. Stone, Law Psychiatry and Morality 96 (1984).
172. Bruce Ennis & Thomas Litwack, "Psychiatry and the Presumption of Expertise: Flipping Coins in the Courtroom," 62 California Law Review 693, 700-02 (1974).
173. Morse, "Crazy Behavior," 621-22Daniel W. Shuman & Bruce D. Sales, "The Admissibility of Expert Testimony Based upon Clinical Judgment and Scientific Research," 4 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 1226, 1250 (1998).
174. Christopher Slobogin, "An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases," 86 Virginia Law Review 1199, 1208-15 (2000).
175. Christopher Slobogin, Minding Justice: Laws That Deprive People with Mental Disability of Life and Liberty 28-32 (2006).
176. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 186-90 (2d ed. 1997).
177. Slobogin, "An End to Insanity," 1214.
178. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations 187.
179. Wayne LaFave, Criminal Law 497, 785, 543 (4th ed. 2003).
180. Ellen Fels Berkman, "Mental Illness as an Aggravating Circumstance in Capital Sentencing," 89 Columbia Law Review 291, 297 (1989).
181. Susan R. Klein, "The Return of Federal Judicial Discretion in Criminal Sentencing," 39 Valparaiso Law Review 693, 726-27, 732-33 (2005).
182. Mitzi Dorland & Daniel Krauss, "The Danger of Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing: Exacerbating the Problem of Arbitrary and Capricious Decision-Making," 29 Law & Psychology Review 63, 64 n. 5 (2005).
183. Ralph Reisner et al., Law and the Mental Health System: Civil and Criminal Aspects 666 (4th ed. 2004).
184. W. Lawrence Fitch, "Sex Offender Commitment in the United States: Legislative and Policy Concerns," 989 Annals of the New York Academy of Science 489 (2003).
185. Samuel Brakel & Richard Rock, The Mentally Disabled and the Law 341 (1971).
186. W. Lawrence Fitch & Debra A. Hammen, "The New Generation of Sex Offender Commitment Laws: Which States Have Them and How Do They Work?," in Protecting Society from Sexually Dangerous Offenders 27, 33.
187. Christopher Slobogin, "The Civilization of the Criminal Law," 58 Vanderbilt Law Review 121 (2005).
188. Andrew Von Hirsch, Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments 19-26 (1976).
189. Andre A. Moenssens et al., Scientific Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases 8 (4th ed. 1995).
190. John William Strong, "Questions Affecting the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence," 1970 University of Illinois Law Forum 1, 14.
191. Reisner et al., Law and the Mental Health System, 519.
192. Edward J.Imwinkelried, "The Standard for Admitting Scientific Evidence: A Critique from the Perspective of Juror Psychology," 28 Villanova Law Review 554 (1983).
193. Michael J. Gottesman, "Admissibility of Expert Testimony after Daubert The, 'Prestige' Factor," 43 Emory Law Journal 867, 975-76 (1996).
194. Michael H. Graham, "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: No Frye, Now What?," 30 Criminal Law Bulletin 153, 162 (1994).
195. Robert I. Simon, "Retrospective Assessment of Mental States in Criminal and Civil Litigation: A Clinical Review," in Retrospective Assessment of Mental States in Litigation: Predicting the Past 2 (Robert I. Simon & Daniel W. Shuman eds., 2002).
196. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 230-32 (2d ed. 1997).
197. Julian L. Simon & Paul Burstein, Basic Research Methods in Social Science 22 (3d ed. 1985).
198. Samuel Messick, "The Once and Future Issues of Validity: Assessing the Meaning and Consequences of Measurement," in Test Validity 33, 40 (Howard Waine & Henry Braun eds., 1988).
199. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations 216-18.
200. Kenneth W. Eckhardt & M. David Ermann, Social Research Methods: Perspective, Theory, and Analysis 99 (1977).
201. Daniel B. Fishman, The Case for Pragmatic Psychology (1999).
202. Daniel B. Fishman, "Call for Papers for Special Issue of Psychology," Psychology, Public Policy & Law, www.apa.org/journals/law/papercall3.html (retrieved November 30, 2001).
203. Arthur Egendor, "The Postwar Healing of Vietnam Veterans: Recent Research," 33 Hospital & Community Psychiatry 901 (1981).
204. Richard Rogers et al., Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Professional Manual (1992).
205. Richard Rogers & James Cavanaugh, "The Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales," 160 Illinois Medical Journal 164 (1981).
206. Steven L. Golding et al., "The Assessment of Criminal Responsibility: Current Controversies," in The Handbook of Forensic Psychology 379, 390-95 (Alan K. Hess & Irving B. Weiner eds., 1999).
207. Cf. American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, "Ethical Guidelines for the Practice of Forensic Psychiatry," in American Academy of Psychiatry and Law Membership Directory xi-xiv (2000).
208. Daniel Fishman, "From Single Case to Database: A New Method for Enhancing Psychotherapy, Forensic, and Other Psychological Practice," 10 Applied and Preventive Psychology 275 (2001).
209. Max Hamilton, "Mood Disorders: Clinical Features," in 1 Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry V 894 (Harold I. Kaplan & Benjamin Sadock eds., 1989).
210. Thomas Grisso et al., "The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study II: Measures of Abilities Related to Competence to Consent to Treatment," 19 Law & Human Behavior 127, 130-36 (1995).
211. Philip H. Witt, "Transfer of Juveniles to Adult Court: The Case of H.H.," 9 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 361, 375 (2003).
212. Fishman, The Case for Pragmatic Psychology, 172, 218.
213. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations, 190-93.
214. Wayne R. LaFave et al., 1 Criminal Procedure 147 (2d ed. 1999).
215. Fishman, The Case for Pragmatic Psychology 192.
216. Christopher C. Langdell, "Address to Harvard Law School Association," in A Record of the Commemoration, November 5th through 8th, 1886, on the 250th Anniversary of the Founding of Harvard College 84, 86-87 (Justin Winsor ed., 1887).
217. Charles W. Collier, "The Use and Abuse of Humanistic Theory in Law: Reexamining the Assumptions of Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship," 41 Duke Law Journal 191, 200 (1991).
218. Fishman, The Case for Pragmatic Psychology 173-74.
219. Norman J. Finkel, "The Insanity Defense: A Comparison of Verdict Schemas," 15 Law & Human Behavior 533, 544 (1991).
220. Calvin Woodard, "The Limits of Legal Realism: An Historical Perspective," 54 Virginia Law Review 689 (1968).
221. Richard Bonnie & Christopher Slobogin, "The Role of Mental Health Professionals in Criminal Cases: The Case for Informed Speculation," 66 Virginia Law Review 427, 503-08 (1981).
222. David Goleman, "Who's Mentally 111?," Psychology Today 34 (Jan. 1978).
223. Samuel Fennig et al., "Comparison of Facility and Research Diagnoses in First-Admission Psychotic Patients," 151 American Journal of Psychiatry 1423, 1426 (1994).
224. Paul B. Lieberman & Frances M. Baker, "The Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis in the Emergency Room," 36 Hospital & Community Psychiatry 291, 292 (1985).
225. Lieberman & Baker, "Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis," 292.
226. Graham Mellsop, "The Reliability of Axis II of DSM-III," 139 American Journal of Psychiatry 1360, 1361 (1982).
227. David Faust & Jay Ziskin, "The Expert Witness in Psychology and Psychiatry," 241 Science 31 (1988).
228. Michael Flaum et al., "The Reliability of 'Bizarre' Delusions," 32 Comprehensive Psychiatry 59, 62 (1991).
229. Thomas F. Oltmanns, "Approaches to the Definition and Study of Delusions," in Delusional Beliefs 3-11 (Thomas F. Oltmanns & Brendan A. Maher eds., 1988).
230. Richard Rogers & Daniel W. Shuman, Fundamentals of Forensic Practice: Mental Health and Criminal Law 11-13 (2005).
231. Pamela Taylor et al., "Delusion and Violence," in Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments in Risk Assessment 161 (John Monahan & Henry Steadman eds., 1994).
232. Richard Rogers, Handbook of Diagnostic and Structured Interviewing (2001); Charles E. Holzer II et al., "Reliability of Diagnoses in Mental Disorders," 19 Psychiatric Clinics of North America 73 (1996).
233. Fennig et al., "Comparison of Facility and Research Diagnoses," 1426.
234. Kenneth K. Fukunaga et al., "Insanity Plea: Inter-Examiner Agreement and Concordance of Psychiatric Opinion and Court Verdict," 5 Law & Human Behavior 325 (1981).
235. Michael R. Phillips et al., "Psychiatry and the Criminal Justice System: Testing the Myths," 145 American Journal of Psychiatry 605 (1988).
236. Thomas Grisso, Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments 12 (2d ed. 2003).
237. Ronald J. Rychlak & Joseph Rychlak, "Mental Health Experts on Trial: Free Will and Determinism in the Courtroom," 100 West Virginia Law Review 193, 195, 209 (1997).
238. Stephen J. Morse, "Excusing and the New Excuse Defenses: A Legal and Conceptual Review," 23 Crime & Justice 329, 367 (1998).
239. Max Hamilton, "Mood Disorders: Clinical Features," in 1 Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry V 894 (Harold I. Kaplan & Benjamin Sadock eds., 1989).
240. Paul E. Meehl, "Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology," 46 Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 806, 806 (1978).
241. Thomas Grisso, "Pretrial Clinical Evaluations in Criminal Cases: Past Trends and Future Directions," 23 Criminal Justice & Behavior 90, 97-98 (1996).
242. Michael H. Graham, "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: No Frye, Now What?," 30 Criminal Law Bulletin 153, 162 (1994).
243. Christopher B. Mueller & Laird C. Kirkpatrick, Evidence 1008 (1999).
244. Susan J. Brison, "Outliving Oneself: Trauma, Memory, and Personal Identity," in Feminists Rethink the Self, 12 (Diana Tietjens Meyers ed., 1977).
245. Jaegwon Kim, Philosophy of Mind (1996).
246. Robin West, Caring for Justice (1997).
247. Andrew E. Taslitz, "A Feminist Approach to Social Scientific Evidence: Foundations," 5 Michigan Journal of Gender and the Law 1, 12-17, 78 (1998).
248. Alexander Rosenberg, "The Explanation of Human Action," in Philosophy of Social Science 47-49 (1988).
249. Stephen J. Morse, "Crazy Behavior, Morals and Science: An Analysis of Mental Health Law," 51 Southern California Law Review 527, 584 (1978).
250. Thomas D. Lyon & Jonathan J. Koehler, "The Relevance Ratio: Evaluating the Probative Value of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases," 82 Cornell Law Review 43, 46-50 (1996).
251. Ellen Hochstedler Steury & Michelle Choinski, " 'Normal' Crimes and Mental Disorder: A Two-Group Comparison of Deadly and Dangerous Felonies," 18 International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 183, 197 (1995).
252. Pamela J. Taylor, "Motives for Offending among Violent and Psychotic Men," 147 British Journal of Psychiatry 491, 493 (1985).
253. Robert F. Schopp, Automatism, Insanity, and the Psychology of Criminal Responsibility 185-87 (1991).
254. Morse, "Crazy Behavior," 587-88.
255. David L. Faigman, "The Evidentiary Status of Social Science under Daubert Is It 'Scientific,' 'Technical,' or 'Other' Knowledge?," 1 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 960, 971-77 (1995).
256. Peter Arenella, "Demystifying the Abuse Excuse: Is There One?," 19 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 703, 703-05 (1996).
257. Richard J. Bonnie, "Excusing and Punishing in Criminal Adjudication: A Reality Check," 5 Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 1, 3-4, 15 (1995).
258. Stephanie B. Goldberg, "Fault Lines: Has a Talk-Show Mentality Softened Jurors to Accept Any Excuse?," American Bar Association Journal 40, 42 (June1994).
259. Christopher Slobogin, "Estelle v. Smith: Constitutional Contours of the Forensic Evaluation Process," 31 Emory Law Journal 71, 97-98 (1982).
260. Note, "Incompetency to Stand Trial," 81 Harvard Law Review 454, 459 (1967).
261. John Bradford & Selwyn Smith, "Amnesia and Homicide: The Padola Case and a Study of Thirty Cases," 7 Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 219 (1979).
262. Pamela J. Taylor & Michael L. Kopelman, "Amnesia for Criminal Offenses," 14 Psychological Medicine 581 (1984).
263. Michael L. Perlin, "Unpacking the Myths: The Symbolism Mythology of Insanity Defense Jurisprudence," 40 Case Western Reserve Law Review 599, 709-10 (1989-1990).
264. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 245-46 (2d ed. 1997).
265. Richard J. Bonnie & Christopher Slobogin, "The Role of Mental Health Professionals in the Criminal Process: The Case for Informed Speculation," 66 Virginia Law Review 427, 486-88 (1980).
266. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations 592.
267. Meehl, "Theoretical Risks," 817.
268. Ralph Underwager & Hollida Wakefield, "A Paradigm Shift for Expert Witnesses," 5 Issues in Child Sex Abuse Accusations 156, 158-59 (1993).
269. Tom R. Tyler, Why People Obey the Law 63 (1990).
270. Paul Robinson & John Darley, Justice, Liability and Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law 7 (1995).
271. E. Allan Lind & Tom R. Tyler, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice 70 (1988).
272. Michael Perlin, " 'The Borderline Which Separated You from Me': The Insanity Defense, the Authoritarian Spirit, the Fear of Faking, and the Culture of Punishment," 82 Iowa Law Review 1375, 1403-04 (1997).
273. Joan H. Krause, "Of Merciful Justice and Justified Mercy: Commuting the Sentences of Battered Women Who Kill," 46 Florida Law Review 699, 719-2 (1994).
274. American Psychiatric Ass'n Task Force, Clinical Aspects of the Violent Individual 33 (1974).
275. "Report of the Task Force on the Role of Psychology in the Criminal Justice System," 33 American Psychologist 1099, 1110 (1978).
276. John Monahan, The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior 47-49 (1981).
277. Saleem Shah, "Dangerousness: A Paradigm for Exploring Some Issues in Law and Psychology," 33 American Psychologist 224, 225 (1978).
278. R. Karl Hanson, "What Do We Know about Sex Offender Risk Assessment?," 4 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 50, 52-53 (1998).
279. Kevin S. Douglas & Jennifer L. Skeem, "Violence Risk Assessment: Getting Specific about Being Dynamic," 11 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 347, 352-53 (2005).
280. Harry L. Kozol et al., "The Diagnosis and Treatment of Dangerousness," 18 Crime & Delinquency 371, 383 (1972).
281. Harry L. Kozol, "The Diagnosis of Dangerousness," in Violence and Victims 3, 8 (S. Pasternack ed., 1975).
282. Kozol et al., "The Diagnosis and Treatment of Dangerousness," 379.
283. Gary Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers 284-85 (2d ed. 1997).
284. Grant T. Harris et al., "Violent Recidivism of Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Statistical Prediction Instrument," 20 Criminal Justice & Behavior 315 (1993).
285. Grant T. Harris et al., "Prospective Replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in Predicting Violent Recidivism among Forensic Patients," 26 Law & Human Behavior 377, 385 (2002).
286. John Monahan et al., Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence 134 (2001).
287. Henry Steadman et al., "A Classification Tree Approach to the Development of Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment Tools," 24 Law & Human Behavior 83 (2000).
288. D. Epperson et al., "Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, Validation, and Recommended Risk Level Cut Scores" (2003), available at www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/epperson/TechUpdatePaperl2-03.pdf.
289. Richard Hamill, "Recidivism of Sex Offenders: What You Need to Know," 15 Criminal Justice 24, 30 (2001).
290. R. Karl Hanson, "The Development of a Brief Actuarial Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism" 13 (1997), available at www.sgc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/199704_e.pdf.
291. R. Karl Hanson, "What Do We Know about Sex Offender Risk Assessment?," 4 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 50, 65-67 (1998).
292. Vernon Quinsey et al., Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk 171 (1st ed. 1998).
293. Kevin Douglas & Christopher Webster, "The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: Concurrent Validity in a Sample of Incarcerated Offenders," 26 Criminal Justice & Behavior 3 (1999).
294. Kevin Douglas et al., "Assessing Risk for Violence among Psychiatric Patients: The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version," 67 Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 917, 921 (1999).
295. Robert D. Hare, "The Hare PCL-R: Some Issues Concerning Its Use and Misuse," 3 Legal & Criminal Psychology 99 (1998).
296. Steven Wong, "Recidivism and Criminal Career Profiles of Psychopaths: A Longitudinal Study," 24 Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology 147 (1995).
297. Marnie E. Rice et al., "An Evaluation of a Maximum Security Therapeutic Community for Psychopaths and Other Mentally Disordered Offenders," 16 Law & Human Behavior 399 (1992).
298. Barbara Underwood, "Law and the Crystal Ball: Predicting Behavior with Statistical Inference and Individualized Judgment," 88 Yale Law Journal 1408, 1423 (1979).
299. Seymour Halleck, Psychiatry and the Dilemmas of Crime 314 (1967).
300. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations 278-79.
301. Paul Meehl, "What Can the Clinician Do Well?," in Psychodiagnosis: Selected Papers 165, 169-70 (1973).
302. Grant Harris et al., "Psychopathy and Violent Recidivism," 15 Law and Human Behavior 625, 631 (Table 1) (1991).
303. Monahan et al., Rethinking Risk Assessment 134.
304. Grant T. Harris, "The Construct of Psychopathy," 28 Crime & Justice 197, 217 (2001).
305. Melton et al., Psychological Evaluations 283.
306. Christopher Slobogin, "Dangerousness and Expertise," 133 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 97, 110-11, 117-18 (1984).
307. John Monahan, Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior 47.
308. John Monahan et al., "An Actuarial Model of Violence Risk Assessment for Persons with Mental Disorders," 56 Psychiatric Services 810, 814 (2005).
309. Diana S. Sepejak et al., "Clinical Predictions of Dangerousness: Two Year Follow-up of 408 Pre-Trial Forensic Cases," 11 Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 171 (1983).
310. Charles Lidz et al., "The Accuracy of Predictions of Violence to Others," 269 Journal of the American Medical Association 1007 (1993).
311. Jay Apperson et al., "Short-Term Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior: Artifacts of Research Methods," 150 American Journal of Psychiatry 1374 (1993).
312. Deidre Klassen & William O'Connor, "A Prospective Study of Predictors of Violence in Adult Male Mental Patients," 12 Law and Human Behavior 143 (1988).
313. John Monahan, "The Prediction of Violent Behavior: Toward a Second Generation of Theory and Policy," 141 American Journal of Psychiatry 10, 11(1984).
314. Randy Otto, "On the Ability of Mental Health Professionals to 'Predict Dangerousness': A Commentary on Interpretations of the 'Dangerousness' Literature," 18 Law & Psychology Review A3, 63 &n.63 (1994).
315. Quinsey et al., Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk 148 (2d ed. 2006).
316. Harris et al., "Prospective Replication of the VRAG," 386.
317. John Monahan et al., "An Actuarial Model of Violence Risk Assessment for Persons with Mental Disorders," 56 Psychiatric Services 810, 814 (2005).
318. R. Karl Hanson et al., "Research Summary, Corrections Research and Development" 13 (Jan. 1997).
319. Douglas & Weir, "HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme," 5-9.
320. M. Dolan & M. Doyle, "Violence Risk Prediction: Clinical and Actuarial Measures and the Role of the Psychopathy Checklist," 177 British Journal of Psychiatry 303, 305 (2000).
321. Quinsey et al., Violent Offenders (1st ed.), 171.
322. Thomas R. Litwack, "Actuarial versus Clinical Assessments of Dangerousness," 7 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 409, 437 (2001).
323. Cass R. Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (1999).
324. Randy K. Otto & John Petrila, "Admissibility of Testimony Based on Actuarial Scales in Sex Offender Commitments: A Reply to Doren," 3 Sex Offender Law Reporter 1 (2002).
325. Alexander Scherr, "Daubert & Danger: The 'Fit' of Expert Predictions in Civil Commitment," 55 Hastings Law Journal 1, 60 (2003).
326. John Monahan, "A Jurisprudence of Risk Assessment: Forecasting Harm among Prisoners, Predators and Patients," 92 Virginia Law Review 391, 410 n.74 (2005).
327. Eric S. Janus & Robert A. Prentky, "Forensic Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment with Sex Offenders: Accuracy, Admissibility and Accountability," 40 American Criminal Law Review 1443, 1459 & n.90 (2003).
328. Gordon Allport, "The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science," 49 S.S.R.C. Bulletin 156 (1942).
329. Paul Meehl, Clinical versus Statistical Prediction 19 (1954).
330. Monahan, The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior 66.
331. Joseph T. McCann, "Standards for Expert Testimony in New York Death Penalty Cases," New York State Bar Journal 39, 31 (July-Aug. 1996).
332. Marnie Rice & Grant T. Harris, "Cross-validation and Extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for Child Molesters and Rapists," 21 Law & Human Behavior 231 (1997).
333. Donna Cropp Bechman, "Sex Offender Civil Commitments: Scientists or Psychics?," 16 Criminal Justice 24, 29 (2001).
334. Litwack, "Actuarial versus Clinical Assessments," 428.
335. Quinsey et al., Violent Offenders (1st ed. 1998), 177-78.
336. Monahan, The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior 74-75.
337. Daniel Goodman, "Demographic Evidence in Capital Sentencing," 39 Stanford Law Review 499, 521 (1987).
338. Monahan, "A Jurisprudence of Risk Assessment," 428.
339. John E. Nowak & Ronald D. Rotunda, Principles of Constitutional Law 378-79 (2d ed. 2005).
340. Monahan et al., Rethinking Risk Assessment 163.
341. Christopher Slobogin, "The World without a Fourth Amendment," 39 UCLA Law Review 1, 85-86 (1991).
342. Norval Morris, "Predicting Violence with Statistics," 34 Stanford Law Review 249, 253 (1981).
343. Paul Robinson, "Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice," 114 Harvard Law Review 1429 (2001).
344. Richard S. Frase, "State Sentencing Guidelines: Diversity, Consensus, and Unresolved Policy Issues," 105 Columbia Law Review 1190, 1200 (2005).
345. Monahan, A Jurisprudence of Risk Assessment 429.