Stock assessment methods for sustainable fisheries

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-6

  Cadrin, Steven X ^a   Dickey Collas, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

^b International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

methods; simulation; stock assessment; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; STOCK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BOSTON; MASSACHUSETTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922444106     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu228     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Ailloud, L., Smith, M., Then, A., Omori, K., Ralph, G., and Hoenig, J. 2015. Properties of age compositions and mortality estimates derived from cohort slicing of length data. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 44-53.
2. Arnold, L., and Heppell, S. 2015. Testing the robustness of data-poor assessment methods to uncertainty in catch and biology: a retrospective approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 243-250.
3. Beverton, R. J. H., and Holt, S. J. 1957. On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations. U.K. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Investigation Series, 2: 19.
4. Bentley, N. 2015. Data and time poverty in fisheries estimation: some approaches and potential solutions. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 186-193.
5. Berkson, J., and Thorson, J. 2015. The determination of data-poor catch limits in the United States: is there a better way? ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 237-242.
6. Butterworth, D. S., and Punt, A. E. 1999. Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56: 985-998.
7. Deng, R. A., Punt, A. E., Dichmont, C. M., Buckworth, R. C., and Burridge, C. Y. 2015. Improving catch-prediction setting for tiger prawns in the Northern Prawn Fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 117-129.
8. Deroba, J. J., Butterworth, D. S., Methot, R. D., Jr, De Oliveira, J. A. A., Fernandez, C., Nielsen, A., Cadrin, S. X., et al. 2015. Simulation testing the robustness of stock assessment models to error: some results from the ICES strategic initiative on stock assessment methods. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 19-30.
9. Dickey-Collas, M., Hintzen, N., Nash, R., Schon, P., and Payne, M. 2015. Quirky patterns in time series of estimates of recruitment could be artefacts. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 111-116.
10. Geromont, H. F., and Butterworth, D. S. 2015a. Additional data and more complex assessments:do these provide improved fisheries management advice? ICES Journal of Marine Science.
11. Geromont, H. F., and Butterworth, D. S. 2015b. Generic management procedures for data-poor fisheries: forecasting with few data. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 251-261.
12. Goethel, D. R., Legault, C. M., and Cadrin, S. X. 2015. Demonstration of a spatially explicit, tag-integrated stock assessment model with application to three interconnected stocks of yellowtail flounder off of New England.-ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 164-177.
13. Gulland, J. A. 1983. Fish stock assessment: A manual of basic methods. FAO/Wiley Ser. on Food and Agriculture, Vol 1. 233 pp.
14. Hamel, O. 2015.Amethod for calculating a meta-analytical prior for the natural mortality rate using multiple life-history correlates. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 62-69.
15. Hilborn, R., and Walters, C. J. 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics, and Uncertainty. Chapman and Hall. 570 pp.
16. Hordyk, A., Ono, K., Valencia, S., Loneragan, N., and Prince, J. 2015a. A novel length-based empirical estimation method of the spawning potential ratio (SPR), and tests of its performance, for small-scale, data-poor fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 217-231.
17. Hordyk, A., Ono, K., Sainsbury, K., Loneragan, N., and Prince, J. 2015b. Some explorations of the life history ratios to describe length composition, spawning-per-recruit, and the spawning potential ratio. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 204-216.
18. Hurtado-Ferro, F., Szuwalski, C., Valero, J., Anderson, S., Cunningham, C., Johnson, K., Licandeo, R., et al. 2015. Looking in the rearview mirror: bias and retrospective patterns in integrated, age-structured stock assessment models. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 99-110.
19. Hyun, S-Y., Maunder, M., and Rothschild, B. 2015. Homo- and heteroscedasticity of survey index on a production model. ICES Journal of Marine Science.
20. ICES. 2011. ICES Annual Report 2010. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
21. ICES. 2012a. Report on the Classification of Stock Assessment Methods developed by SISAM. ICES CM2012/ACOM/SCICOM: 01. 15 pp.
22. ICES. 2012b. Working Group on Methods of Fish Stock Assessments (WGMG), 8-12 October 2012, Lisbon, Portugal. ICES CM 2012/SSGSUE:09. 249 pp.
23. ICES. 2013. World Conference on Stock Assessment Methods (WCSAM), 15-19 July 2013, Boston, USA. ICES CM 2013/ ACOM/SCICOM:02. 59 pp.
24. Jardim, E., Millar, C. P., Mosqueira, I., Scott, F., Osio, G. C., Ferretti, M., Alzorriz, N., et al. 2015. What if stock assessment is as simple as a linear model? The a4a initiative. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 232-236.
25. Johnson, K., Monnahan, C. C., McGilliard, C. R., Vert, K. A., Anderson, S. C., Cunningham, C. J., Hurtado-Ferro, F., et al. 2015. Time-varying natural mortality in fisheries stock assessment models: Identifying a default approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 137-150.
26. Li, Y., Bence, J., and Brenden, T. 2015. An evaluation of alternative assessment approaches for intermixing fish populations: a case study with Great Lakes lake whitefish. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 70-81.
27. Maunder, M., and Piner, K. 2015. Contemporary fisheries stock assessment: many issues still remain. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 7-18.
28. Millar, C., Jardim, E., Scott, F., Osio, G., Mosqueira, I., and Alzorriz, N. 2015. Model averaging to stream-line the stock assessment process. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 93-98.
29. Needle, C. 2015. Honeycomb: A spatio-temporal simulation model to evaluate management strategies and assessment methods. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 151-163.
30. Ono, K., Licandeo, R. R., Muradian, M. L., Cunningham, C. J., Anderson, S. C., Hurtado-Ferro, F., Johnson, K., et al. 2015. The importance of length and age composition data in statistical catch-at-age model for marine species. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 31-43.
31. Prince, J., Hordyk, A., Valencia, S. R., Loneragan, N., Sainsbury, K., et al. 2015. Revisiting the concept of Beverton-Holt life-history invariants with the aim of informing data-poor fisheries assessment. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 194-203.
32. Quinn, T. J., II, and Deriso, R. B. 1999. Quantitative Fish Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York. 654 pp.
33. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191. Ottawa. 382 pp.
34. Smith, M., Fulton, E., and Day, R. 2015. An investigation into fisheries interaction effects using Atlantis. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 275-283.
35. Then, A., Hoenig, J., Hall, N., and Hewitt, D. 2015.Evaluating the predictiveperformance ofempirical estimatorsofnaturalmortality rateusing information on 201 fish species. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 82-92.
36. Thorson, J. T., Hicks, A. C., and Methot, R. D. 2015. Random effect estimation of time-varying factors in Stock Synthesis. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 178-185.
37. Zhou, S., Buckworth, R., Ellis, N., Deng, R., and Pascoe, S. 2015. Getting all information out of logbooks: estimating prawn fishable biomass, catchability and fishing power increase, with a focus on natural mortality. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 54-61.