Increased cervical cancer risk associated with screening at longer intervals

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 311-315

  Kinney, Walter ^a   Wright, Thomas C ^a   Dinkelspiel, Helen E ^a   Defrancesco, Mark ^a   Thomas Cox, J ^a   Huh, Warner ^a  

^a

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER THERAPY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLPOSCOPY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING TEST; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; WART VIRUS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; MASS SCREENING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; TIME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84922432338     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000632     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Screening for cervical cancer. Practice Bulletin No. 131. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1222-38
2. Dinkelspiel H, Fetterman B, Poitras N, Kinney W, Cox JT, Lorey T, et al. Cervical cancer rates after the transition from annual pap to 3-year HPV and pap. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2014; 18: 57-60
3. Eddy DM. The frequency of cervical cancer screening. Comparison of a mathematical model with empirical data. Cancer 1987; 60: 1117-22
4. Hutchinson ML, Berger BM, Farber FL. Clinical and cost implications of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: the impact of test sensitivity. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: 766-80
5. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 293: 659-64
6. McCrory DC, Matchar DB, Bastian L, Datta S, Hasselblad V, Hickey J, et al. Evaluation of cervical cytology. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 1999: 1-6
7. Miller MG, Sung HY, Sawaya GF, Kearney KA, Kinney W, Hiatt RA. Screening interval and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 29-37
8. Sawaya GF, Sung HY, Kinney W, Kearney KA, Miller MG, Hiatt RA. Cervical cancer after multiple negative cytologic tests in long-Term members of a prepaid health plan. Acta Cytol 2005; 49: 391-7
9. Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Poitras NE, Cheung L, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 663-72
10. Gage JC, Schiffman M, Katki HA, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Wentzensen N, et al. Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106. [Epub ahead of print
11. Kulasingam SL, Havrilesky LJ, Ghebre R, Myers ER. Screening for cervical cancer: a modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013; 17: 193-202
12. Howden LM, Meyer JA. 2010 Census briefs. Age and sex composition: 2010. 2010. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf. Retrieved December 17, 2014
13. Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, Walter SD, Hanley J, Ferenczy A, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1579-88
14. Koliopoulos G, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Kyrgiou M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-Analysis of non-randomized studies. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104: 232-46
15. Castanon A, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P, et al. Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345: e5174
16. Frega A, Sesti F, De Sanctis L, Pacchiarotti A, Votano S, Biamonti A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 122: 145-9
17. Pils S, Eppel W, Seemann R, Natter C, Ott J. Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after loop excision of the transformation zone conisation: a retrospective analysis. BJOG 2014; 121: 457-62
18. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24: 25-7
19. Werner CL, Lo JY, Heffernan T, Griffith WF, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 605-8
20. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 1059-60
21. Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 467-70
22. Reilly R, Paranjothy S, Beer H, Brooks CJ, Fielder HM, Lyons RA. Birth outcomes following treatment for precancerous changes to the cervix: a population-based record linkage study. BJOG 2012; 119: 236-44
23. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1246-50
24. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 504-10
25. Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, et al. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG 2012; 119: 685-91
26. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004; 291: 2100-6
27. Conner SN, Frey HA, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Colditz GA, Tuuli MG. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 752-61