Restriction of replication fork regression activities by a conserved SMC complex

Molecular Cell

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 436-445

  Xue, Xiaoyu ^a   Choi, Koyi ^b,c   Bonner, Jacob N ^b,c   Chiba, Tamara ^a   Kwon, Youngho ^a   Xu, Yuanyuan ^a   Sanchez, Humberto ^d   Wyman, Claire ^d   Niu, Hengyao ^a   Zhao, Xiaolan ^b,c   Sung, Patrick ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c Weill Cornell Medical Center   (United States)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA HELICASE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; MPH1 PROTEIN; OLIGOMER; SMC5 PROTEIN; SMC6 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DEAD BOX PROTEIN; FUNGAL DNA; MPH1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SMC5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SMC6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA STRUCTURE; ENZYME INACTIVATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASES; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84922431202     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ampatzidou E., Irmisch A., O'Connell M.J., Murray J.M. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:9387-9401.
2. Banerjee S., Smith S., Oum J.H., Liaw H.J., Hwang J.Y., Sikdar N., Motegi A., Lee S.E., Myung K. Mph1p promotes gross chromosomal rearrangement through partial inhibition of homologous recombination. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:1083-1093.
3. Bétous R., Mason A.C., Rambo R.P., Bansbach C.E., Badu-Nkansah A., Sirbu B.M., Eichman B.F., Cortez D. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:151-162.
4. Blastyák A., Pintér L., Unk I., Prakash L., Prakash S., Haracska L. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:167-175.
5. Bugreev D.V., Mazina O.M., Mazin A.V. Rad54 protein promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nature 2006, 442:590-593.
6. Chavez A., Agrawal V., Johnson F.B. Homologous recombination-dependent rescue of deficiency in the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) 5/6 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:5119-5125.
7. Chen Y.H., Choi K., Szakal B., Arenz J., Duan X., Ye H., Branzei D., Zhao X. Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:21252-21257.
8. Chiolo I., Minoda A., Colmenares S.U., Polyzos A., Costes S.V., Karpen G.H. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 2011, 144:732-744.
9. Choi K., Szakal B., Chen Y.H., Branzei D., Zhao X. The Smc5/6 complex and Esc2 influence multiple replication-associated recombination processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:2306-2314.
10. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:153-159.
11. Couch F.B., Bansbach C.E., Driscoll R., Luzwick J.W., Glick G.G., Bétous R., Carroll C.M., Jung S.Y., Qin J., Cimprich K.A., Cortez D. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1610-1623.
12. Cox M.M., Goodman M.F., Kreuzer K.N., Sherratt D.J., Sandler S.J., Marians K.J. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 2000, 404:37-41.
13. Crismani W., Girard C., Froger N., Pradillo M., Santos J.L., Chelysheva L., Copenhaver G.P., Horlow C., Mercier R. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 2012, 336:1588-1590.
14. Doe C.L., Ahn J.S., Dixon J., Whitby M.C. Mus81-Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:32753-32759.
15. Doyle J.M., Gao J., Wang J., Yang M., Potts P.R. MAGE-RING protein complexes comprise a family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:963-974.
16. Duan X., Sarangi P., Liu X., Rangi G.K., Zhao X., Ye H. Structural and functional insights into the roles of the Mms21 subunit of the Smc5/6 complex. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:657-668.
17. Gangavarapu V., Haracska L., Unk I., Johnson R.E., Prakash S., Prakash L. Mms2-Ubc13-dependent and -independent roles of Rad5 ubiquitin ligase in postreplication repair and translesion DNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:7783-7790.
18. Gari K., Décaillet C., Stasiak A.Z., Stasiak A., Constantinou A. The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:141-148.
19. Hansma H.G., Kasuya K., Oroudjev E. Atomic force microscopy imaging and pulling of nucleic acids. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14:380-385.
20. Hu J., Sun L., Shen F., Chen Y., Hua Y., Liu Y., Zhang M., Hu Y., Wang Q., Xu W., et al. The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing. Cell 2012, 149:1221-1232.
21. Kegel A., Sjögren C. The Smc5/6 complex: more than repair?. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2010, 75:179-187.
22. Lindroos H.B., Ström L., Itoh T., Katou Y., Shirahige K., Sjögren C. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol. Cell 2006, 22:755-767.
23. Lorenz A., Osman F., Sun W., Nandi S., Steinacher R., Whitby M.C. The fission yeast FANCM ortholog directs non-crossover recombination during meiosis. Science 2012, 336:1585-1588.
24. Michel B., Flores M.J., Viguera E., Grompone G., Seigneur M., Bidnenko V. Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:8181-8188.
25. Minca E.C., Kowalski D. Multiple Rad5 activities mediate sister chromatid recombination to bypass DNA damage at stalled replication forks. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:649-661.
26. Petukhova G., Van Komen S., Vergano S., Klein H., Sung P. Yeast Rad54 promotes Rad51-dependent homologous DNA pairing via ATP hydrolysis-driven change in DNA double helix conformation. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:29453-29462.
27. Prakash R., Satory D., Dray E., Papusha A., Scheller J., Kramer W., Krejci L., Klein H., Haber J.E., Sung P., Ira G. Yeast Mph1 helicase dissociates Rad51-made D-loops: implications for crossover control in mitotic recombination. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:67-79.
28. Ralf C., Hickson I.D., Wu L. The Bloom's syndrome helicase can promote the regression of a model replication fork. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:22839-22846.
29. Ristic D., Wyman C., Paulusma C., Kanaar R. The architecture of the human Rad54-DNA complex provides evidence for protein translocation along DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:8454-8460.
30. Singh T.R., Saro D., Ali A.M., Zheng X.F., Du C.H., Killen M.W., Sachpatzidis A., Wahengbam K., Pierce A.J., Xiong Y., et al. MHF1-MHF2, a histone-fold-containing protein complex, participates in the Fanconi anemia pathway via FANCM. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:879-886.
31. Sollier J., Driscoll R., Castellucci F., Foiani M., Jackson S.P., Branzei D. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:1671-1682.
32. Sun W., Nandi S., Osman F., Ahn J.S., Jakovleska J., Lorenz A., Whitby M.C. The FANCM ortholog Fml1 promotes recombination at stalled replication forks and limits crossing over during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:118-128.
33. Torres-Rosell J., De Piccoli G., Cordon-Preciado V., Farmer S., Jarmuz A., Machin F., Pasero P., Lisby M., Haber J.E., Aragón L. Anaphase onset before complete DNA replication with intact checkpoint responses. Science 2007, 315:1411-1415.
34. Weinert T., Kaochar S., Jones H., Paek A., Clark A.J. The replication fork's five degrees of freedom, their failure and genome rearrangements. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:778-784.
35. West S.C. Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1997, 31:213-244.
36. Whitby M.C. The FANCM family of DNA helicases/translocases. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2010, 9:224-236.
37. Yeeles J.T., Poli J., Marians K.J., Pasero P. Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a012815.
38. Zhao X., Blobel G. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:4777-4782.
39. Zheng X.F., Prakash R., Saro D., Longerich S., Niu H., Sung P. Processing of DNA structures via DNA unwinding and branch migration by the S. cerevisiae Mph1 protein. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2011, 10:1034-1043.