Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted mri in endometrial cancer: A preliminary correlation study with histological grade

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 55, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1270-1277

  Woo, Sungmin ^a   Cho, Jeong Yeon ^a   Kim, Sang Youn ^a   Kim, Seung Hyup ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Genital; Histogram; Histological grade; MR diffusion perfusion; Reproductive; Uterus

Indexed keywords

CELL DEATH; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; GRADING; GRAPHIC METHODS; HIGHER ORDER STATISTICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STATISTICS; TUMORS;

APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; GENITAL; HISTOGRAM; MR-DIFFUSION/PERFUSION; REPRODUCTIVE; UTERUS;

SURFACE DIFFUSION;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SIZE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HISTOGRAM; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; ENDOMETRIUM; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TUMOR VOLUME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER CURVE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84922394773     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113514967     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet 2005;366:491-505.
2. Berman ML, Ballon SC, Lagasse LD, et al. Prognosis and treatment of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:679-688.
3. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A gynecologic oncology group study. Cancer 1987;60:2035-2041.
4. Goff BA, Rice LW. Assessment of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1990;38:46-48.
5. Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:682-687.
6. Nakamura K, Imafuku N, Nishida T, et al. Measurement of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (adcmin) of the primary tumor and ca125 are predictive of disease recurrence for patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:335-339.
7. Seo JM, Kim CK, Choi D, et al. Endometrial cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;37:1151-1159.
8. Nakamura K, Joja I, Fukushima C, et al. The preoperative suvmax is superior to adcmin of the primary tumour as a predictor of disease recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:52-60.
9. Bharwani N, Miquel ME, Sahdev A, et al. Diffusionweighted imaging in the assessment of tumour grade in endometrial cancer. Br J Radiol 2011;84:997-1004.
10. Lin G, Ng KK, Chang CJ, et al. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusionweighted 3.0-T MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2009;250:784-792.
11. Cao K, Gao M, Sun YS, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-relationship with local invasiveness. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1926-1930.
12. Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, et al. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases. Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:256-262.
13. Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, et al. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 2013;82:342-348.
14. Kang Y, Choi SH, Kim YJ, et al. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard-or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging-correlation with tumor grade. Radiology 2011; 261:882-890.
15. Ahn SJ, Choi SH, Kim YJ, et al. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of standard and high b-value diffusion MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a correlation study with histological grade. Acad Radiol 2012;19:1233-1240.
16. Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA, et al. Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:314-320.
17. Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, et al. Outcome of high-risk stage Ic, grade 3, compared with stage I endometrial carcinoma patients: the postoperative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1234-1241.
18. Alkushi A, Kobel M, Kalloger SE, et al. High-grade endometrial carcinoma: serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas have different immunophenotypes and outcomes. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010;29:343-350.
19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845.
20. Boronow RC, Morrow CP, Creasman WT, et al. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:825-832.
21. Dubinsky TJ, Parvey HR, Maklad N. The role of transvaginal sonography and endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of peri- and postmenopausal bleeding. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:145-149.
22. Park BK, Kim B, Park JM, et al. Differentiation of the various lesions causing an abnormality of the endometrial cavity using MR imaging: emphasis on enhancement patterns on dynamic studies and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1591-1598.
23. Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, et al. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:487-493.
24. Whittaker CS, Coady A, Culver L, et al. Diffusionweighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumors: a pictorial review. Radiographics 2009;29:759-774.
25. Jimenez-Ayala M, Jimenez-Ayala Portillo B, Iglesias E, et al. Endometrial adenocarcinoma: prevention and early diagnosis. Monogr Clin Cytol 2008;17:1-91.