Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains

Regional Environmental Change

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 2005-2018

  Bagstad, Kenneth J ^a   Reed, James M ^a,b   Semmens, Darius J ^a   Sherrouse, Benson C ^a   Troy, Austin ^c  

^a DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

ARIES; Cultural ecosystem services; Hotspot analysis; Modeling; Social values; SolVES

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922360653     PISSN: 14363798     EISSN: 1436378X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0756-7     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alessa L, Kliskey A, Brown G (2008) Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landsc Urban Plan 85:27–39. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007
2. ARIES Consortium (2014) ARIES—Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services. http://www.ariesonline.org/. Accessed 27 Jan 2014
3. Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Winthrop R (2013a) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst Serv 5:27–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004
4. Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Winthrop R (2013b) Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosyst Serv 5:40–50. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007
5. Beverly JL, Uto K, Wilkes J, Bothwell P (2008) Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach. Can J For Res 38:289–303. doi:10.1139/X07-149
6. Box GP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. JR Stat Soc B26:211–252
7. Boykin KG, Kepner WG, Bradford DF, Guy RK, Kopp DA, Leimer AK, Samson EA, East NF, Neale AC, Gergely KJ (2013) A national approach for mapping and quantifying habitat-based biodiversity metrics across multiple spatial scales. Ecol Indic 33:139–147. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.005
8. Brown G (2005) Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Soc Nat Resour 18:17–39. doi:10.1080/08941920590881853
9. Brown G (2012) Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA J 25(2):7–18. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007
10. Brown G (2013) The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosyst Serv 5:58–68. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x
11. Brown G, Brabyn L (2012) An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc Urban Plan 107:317–331. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007
12. Brown G, Pullar DV (2012) An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26(2):231–246. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.585139
13. Brown G, Reed P (2000) Validation of a forest values typology for use in National Forest planning. For Sci 46(2):240–247
14. Brown G, Reed P (2009) Public participation GIS: a new method for use in National Forest planning. For Sci 55(2):166–182
15. Brown G, Smith C, Alessa L, Kliskey A (2004) A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Appl Geogr 24(2):161–180. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.621511
16. Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K (2012) Public Participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour 25(7):633–651. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.621511
17. Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, King D (2011) Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conserv Biol 25(1):172–181. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01560
18. Carver S, Watson A, Waters T, Matt R, Gunderson K, Davis B (2009) Developing computer-based participatory approaches to mapping landscape values for landscape and resource management. In: Geertman S, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practices and new methods. Springer, New York, pp 431–448. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_21
19. Chan KMA, Goldstein J, Satterfield T, Hannahs N, Kikiloi K, Naidoo R, Vadeboncoeur N, Woodside U (2011) Cultural services and non-use values. In: Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S (eds) Natural Capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 207–228. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
20. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
21. Clement JM, Cheng AS (2011) Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes, and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Appl Geogr 31(2):393–400. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.001
22. Cole Z (2012) Mapping social values of ecosystem services in Sarasota Bay, Florida: E-Delphi application, typology creation, and geospatial modeling. Ph.D dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville
23. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):21–28. doi:10.1890/080025
24. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Gret-Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spiernburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(23):8812–8819. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109
25. Denver Water (2014) From Forests to Faucets: U.S. Forest Service and Denver Water Watershed Management Partnership. http://www.denverwater.org/supplyplanning/watersupply/partnershipuSFS/. Accessed 7 Jan 2014
26. Donovan SM, Looney C, Hanson T, Sanchez de Leon Y, Wulfhorst JD, Eigenbrode SD, Jennings M, Johnson-Maynard J, Bosque Perez NA (2009) Reconciling social and biological needs in an endangered ecosystem: the Palouse as a model for bioregional planning. Ecol Soc 14(1):9
27. Dunn CE (2007) Participatory GIS a people’s GIS? Prog Hum Geogr 31(5):616–637. doi:10.1177/0309132507081493
28. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudik M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
29. ESP Maps (2014) The ecosystem services partnership visualization tool: an interactive knowledge platform for ecosystem service maps. http://esp-mapping.net/Home/. Accessed 28 Jan 2014
30. Evans AJ, Waters T (2008) Mapping vernacular geography: web-based GIS tools for capturing “fuzzy” or “vague” entities. Int J Technol Policy Manage 7(2):134–150. doi:10.1504/IJTPM.2007.014547
31. Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M (2012) Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments-Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol Indic 18:421–433. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004
32. Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
33. Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B, Bagstad KJ, Ferrari M, Geneletti D, Klug H, Schirpke U, Tappeiner U (2014) On the effects of scale for ecosystem services mapping. PLoS ONE 9(12):112601. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112601
34. Hermans C, Erickson JD (2007) Multicriteria decision analysis: overview and implications for environmental decision making. In: Erickson JD, Messner F, Ring I (eds) Ecological economics of sustainable watershed management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 213–228. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.001.0001
35. Ives CD, Kendal D (2014) The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J Environ Manage 144:67–72. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013
36. Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosystem Services 4:47–59. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001
37. Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S (eds) (2011) Natural Capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford
38. Klain SC, Chan KMA (2012) Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol Econ 82:104–113. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008
39. Manning RE (2011) Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction, 3rd edn. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
40. Martinez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8(1–2):17–25. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
41. McIntyre N, Moore J, Yuan M (2008) A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Soc Nat Resour 21:657–670. doi:10.1080/08941920802022297
42. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment: living beyond our means—natural assets and human well-being. World Resour Inst, Washington, DC
43. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
44. Pocewicz A, Nielsen-Pincus M, Brown G, Schnitzer R (2012) An evaluation of internet versus paper-based methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Trans GIS 16(1):39–53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01287.x
45. Raymond C, Brown G (2011) Assessing spatial associations between perceptions of landscape value and climate change risk for use in climate change planning. Clim Change 104:653–678. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9806-9
46. Raymond C, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68:1301–1315. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
47. Raymond CM, Singh G, Benessaiah K, Bernhard JR, Levine J, Nelson H, Turner NJ, Norton B, Tam J, Chan K (2013) Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships. Bioscience 63(7):536–546. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
48. Rolston H, Coufal J (1991) A forest ethic and multivalue forest management. J For 89:35–40
49. Ruhl JB, Kraft SE, Lant CL (2007) The law and policy of ecosystem services. Island Press, Washington, DC
50. Ruiz-Frau A, Edwards-Jones G, Kaiser MJ (2011) Mapping stakeholder values for coastal zone management. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434:239–249. doi:10.3354/meps09136
51. Schwartz N (1999) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54:93–105. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.54.2.93
52. Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ (2012) Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Version 2.0 (SolVES 2.0): documentation and user manual. U.S. Geological survey open file report 2012–1023
53. Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ (2014) Validating a method for transferring social values of ecosystem services between public lands in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecosyst Serv 8:166–177. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.008
54. Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ (2011) A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr 31:748–760. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002
55. Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ, Clement JM (2014) An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol Indic 36:68–79. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008
56. Sieber R (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 96(3):491–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
57. Tallis H, Polasky S (2011) How much information do managers need? The sensitivity of ecosystem service decisions to model complexity. In: Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S (eds) Natural Capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 264–277. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.001.0001
58. U.K. National Ecosystem Assessment (2011) The U.K. National Ecosystem Assessment: synthesis of key findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge
59. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2012) USDA forest service, Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands. http://www.fs.usda.gov/psicc/. Accessed 19 Sept 2013
60. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sutton SG, Barnes M, Sherrouse BC (2012) Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl Geogr 35:164–173. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008
61. Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Johnson G, Portela R, Honzak M, Batker D (2014) A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS ONE 9(3):e91001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
62. Watson AE, Venn T (2012) Wilderness ecosystem services: a focus on applications. Int J Wilderness 18(3):3
63. Whitehead AL, Kujala H, Ives CD, Gordon A, Lentini PE, Wintle BA, Nicholson E, Raymond C (2014) Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 28(4):992–1003. doi:10.1111/cobi.12257
64. Zhu X, Pfueller S, Whitelaw P, Winter C (2010) Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River region of Victoria, Australia. Environ Manage 45(5):896–911. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x