Lower incidence of hypotension following spinal anesthesia with 6% hydroxyethyl starch preload compared to 9 ‰ saline solution in caesarean delivery;Incidence de l'hypotension après une anesthésie rachidienne avec 6% d'amidon hydroxyéthyle comparé au sérum salé à 9‰ dans les césariennes

Tunisie Medicale

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 406-410

  Romdhani, Chihebeddine ^a   Trabelsi, Walid ^a   Lebbi, Anis ^a   Naas, I ^a   Elaskri, Haythem ^a   Gharsallah, Hedi ^a   Rachdi, Radhouane ^a   Ferjani, Mustapha ^a  

^a MILITARY HOSPITAL OF TUNIS   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Hydroxyethyl starch; Hypotension; Spinal anesthesia

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; HETASTARCH; MORPHINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUFENTANIL; HETASTARCH DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROXYETHYL STARCH DERIVATIVES; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 84922359962     PISSN: 00414131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23:304-9.
2. Datta S, Alper MH, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB. Method of ephedrine administration and nausea and hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1982;56:68-70.
3. Roberts SW, Leveno KJ, Sidawi JE, Lucas MJ, Kelly MA. Fetal acidemia associated with regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Obstetr Gynecol 1995;85:79-83.
4. Allen TK, Muir HA, George RB, Habib AS. A survey of the management of spinal-induced hypotension for scheduled cesarean delivery. Int J Obstetr Anesth 2009;18:356-61.
5. Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993;79:262-9.
6. Banerjee A, Stocche RM, Angle P, Halpern SH. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2010;57:24-31.
7. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007;106:843-63.
8. Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:26.
9. Leo S, Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia AT. A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1600-5.
10. Graphpad. http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/NNT1.cfm Accessed 10/06/2013.
11. Madi-Jebara S, Ghosn A, Sleilaty G, et al. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Voluven®) versus lactated Ringer's solution. J Medic Liban 2008;56:203-7.
12. Ko JS, Kim CS, Cho HS, Choi DH. A randomized trial of crystalloid versus colloid solution for prevention of hypotension during spinal or low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstetr Anesth 2007;16:8-12.
13. Tamilselvan P, Fernando R, Bray J, Sodhi M, Columb M. The effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on cardiac output in the parturient undergoing planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: A randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1916-21.
14. Siddik SM, Aouad MT, Kai GE, Sfeir MM, Baraka AS. Hydroxyethylstarch 10% is superior to Ringer's solution for preloading before spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:616-21.
15. Corke BC, Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB, Alper MH. Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome. Anaesthesia 1982;37:658-62.
16. Caritis SN, Abouleish E, Edelstone DI, Mueller-Heubach E. Fetal acid-base state following spinal or epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56:610-5.
17. Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, et al. [Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2007;26:688-93.
18. Pouta A, Karinen J, Vuolteenaho O, Laatikainen T. Preeclampsia: the effect of intravenous fluid preload on atrial natriuretic peptide secretion during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:1203-9.
19. Smiley RM. Burden of proof. Anesthesiology 2009;111:470-2.
20. Teoh WHL, Sia ATH. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: The effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1592-8.
21. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Nasr VG, et al. A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1219-24.
22. Carvalho B, Mercier FJ, Riley ET, et al. Hetastarch co-loading is as effective as pre-loading for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Int J Obstetr Anesth 2009;18:150-5.
23. Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD002251.