A novel method for bone area measurement provides new insights into osteoarthritis and its progression

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 519-525

  Bowes, Michael A ^a   Vincent, Graham R ^a   Wolstenholme, Christopher B ^a   Conaghan, Philip G ^b  

^a IMORPHICS LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE APPEARANCE MODEL; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ANATOMIC MODEL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOINFORMATICS; BODY MASS; BONE AREA; BONE CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; BONE MALFORMATION; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CARTILAGE THICKNESS; CENTRAL MEDIAL FEMOTIBIAL COMPOSITE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FEMUR; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT CAVITY; JOINT RADIOGRAPHY; JOINT SPACE WIDTH SCORE; KELLGREN LAWRENCE SCORE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PATHOGENESIS; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; AGED; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATELLA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIBIA;

EID: 84922349661     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: 14682060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204052     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet 2011; 377:2115-26.
2. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe P.A., et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133:635-46.
3. Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54:226-9.
4. Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Grant RL. Care and management of osteoarthritis in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008; 336:502-3.
5. Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz R.W., et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18:476-99.
6. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ. Active appearance models. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 2001; 23:681-5.
7. Williams TG, Vincent G, Bowes M., et al. Automatic segmentation of bones and inter-image anatomical correspondence by volumetric statistical modelling of knee MRI. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on Biomedical imaging: from nano to Macro. Rotterdam, Netherlands: IEEE Press, 2010:432-5.
8. Dieppe P. Subchondral bone should be the main target for the treatment of pain and disease progression in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7:325-6.
9. Baker-Lepain JC, Lane NE. Role of bone architecture and anatomy in osteoarthritis. Bone 2012; 51:197-203.
10. Wang Y, Wluka AE, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial plateau bone area in osteoarthritic knees: a cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2005; 7:R687-93.
11. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Cahue S., et al. Medial-to-lateral ratio of tibiofemoral subchondral bone area is adapted to alignment and mechanical load. Calcif Tissue Int 2009; 84:186-94.
12. Frobell RB, Nevitt MC, Hudelmaier M, et al. Femorotibial subchondral bone area and regional cartilage thickness: a cross-sectional description in healthy reference cases and various radiographic stages of osteoarthritis in 1,003 knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken.) 2010; 62:1612-23.
13. Eckstein F, Ateshian G, Burgkart R., et al. Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14:974-83.
14. Eckstein F, Mc Culloch CE, Lynch JA, et al. How do short-term rates of femorotibial cartilage change compare to long-term changes? Four year follow-up data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20:1250-7.
15. Eckstein F, Nevitt M, Gimona A., et al. Rates of change and sensitivity to change in cartilage morphology in healthy knees and in knees with mild, moderate, and end-stage radiographic osteoarthritis: results from 831 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken.) 2011; 63:311-19.
16. Eckstein F, Wirth W, Nevitt MC. Recent advances in osteoarthritis imaging-the osteoarthritis initiative. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2012; 8:622-30.
17. Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16:1433-41.
18. Hunter DJ, Bowes MA, Eaton C.B., et al. Can cartilage loss be detected in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with 3-6 months' observation using advanced image analysis of 3 T MRI? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18:677-83.
19. Reichmann WM, Maillefert JF, Hunter D.J., et al. Responsiveness to change and reliability of measurement of radiographic joint space width in osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19:550-6.
20. Duryea J, Li J, Peterfy C.G., et al. Trainable rule-based algorithm for the measurement of joint space width in digital radiographic images of the knee. Med Phys 2000; 27:580-91.
21. Neumann G, Hunter D, Nevitt M., et al. Location specific radiographic joint space width for osteoarthritis progression. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 761-5.
22. Eckstein F, Maschek S, Wirth W., et al. One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68:674-9.
23. Wirth W, Hellio Le Graverand MP, Wyman BT, et al. Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17:291-7.
24. Wirth W, Duryea J, Hellio Le Graverand MP, et al. Direct comparison of fixed flexion, radiography and MRI in knee osteoarthritis: responsiveness data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:117-25.
25. Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW. Risk factors and prognostic factors of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2007; 3:78-85.
26. Zhang W, McWilliams DF, Ingham S.L., et al. Nottingham knee osteoarthritis risk prediction models. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70:1599-604.
27. Buck RJ, Wirth W, Dreher D., et al. Frequency and spatial distribution of cartilage thickness change in knee osteoarthritis and its relation to clinical and radiographic covariates-data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:102-9.
28. Wluka AE, Wang Y, Davis S.R., et al. Tibial plateau size is related to grade of joint space narrowing and osteophytes in healthy women and in women with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64:1033-7.
29. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Jones G. Tibial subchondral bone size and knee cartilage defects: relevance to knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 479-86.
30. Gregory JS, Waarsing JH, Day J, et al. Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56:3634-43.
31. LYNCH A. J., et al. The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women. Kidlington, ROYAUME-UNI: Elsevier, 2009.
32. Haverkamp DJ, Schiphof D, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. Variation in joint shape of osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63:3401-7.
33. Goldring MB, Goldring SR. Articular cartilage and subchondral bone in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1192:230-7.
34. Dieppe PA, Cushnaghan J, Young P., et al. Prediction of the progression of joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the knee by bone scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis 1993; 52:557-63.
35. Kraus VB, Feng S, Wang S., et al. Trabecular morphometry by fractal signature analysis is a novel marker of osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60:3711-22.
36. Reginster JY, Chapurlat R, Christiansen C., et al. Structure modifying effects of strontium ranelate in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoporosis Int 2012; 23(SUPPL. 2):S58.
37. Karsdal MA, Alexandersen P, John M.R., et al. Oral calcitonin demonstrated symptom-modifying efficacy and increased cartilage volume: results from a 2-year phase 3 trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19(SUPPL. 1):S35.
38. Laslett LL, Dore DA, Quinn S.J., et al. Zoledronic acid reduces knee pain and bone marrow lesions over 1 year: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71:1322-8.
39. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W., et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65:433-41.
40. Neogi T, Bowes MA, Niu J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional bone shape of the knee predicts onset of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:2048-58.