Peer support for CKD patients and carers: Overcoming barriers and facilitating access

Health Expectations

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 617-630

  Taylor, Francesca ^a   Gutteridge, Robin ^b   Willis, Carol ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers; Chronic kidney disease; Facilitation; Participation; Peer support

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CAREGIVER; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; AGED; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER GROUP; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84922349196     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12348     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Chadblan S et al. Patients' experiences and perspectives of living with CKD. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 2009; 53: 689-700.
2. Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. British Medical Journal, 2010; 340: c112.
3. Schell JO, Patel UD, Steinhauser PD. Discussions of the kidney disease trajectory by elderly patients and nephrologists: a qualitative study. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 2012; 59: 495-503.
4. Farrington K, Warwick G. Planning, Initiating and Withdrawal of Renal Replacement Therapy. The Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline. The Renal Association, 2009. Available at: http://www.renal.org/docs/default-source/guidelines-resources/RRT_-_Current_version_17_September_2009_FINAL.pdf, accessed 17 November 2014.
5. Tong A, Palmer S, Mann B et al. The beliefs and expectations of patients and caregivers about home haemodialysis: an interview study. British Medical Journal Open, 2013; 3: e2148.
6. Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 2001; 25: 134-141.
7. Dennis CL. Peer support within a healthcare context: a concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2003; 40: 321-332.
8. Perry E, Swartz J, Brown S, Smith D, Kelly G, Swartz R. Peer mentoring: a culturally sensitive approach to end-of-life planning for long-term dialysis patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2005; 46: 111-119.
9. Department of Health. The NHS Outcomes Framework 2014/2015. London: Department of Health, 2013. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/25646/NHS_outcomes.pdf, accessed 17 November 2014.
10. Hughes J, Wood E, Smith G. Exploring kidney patients' experiences of receiving individual peer support. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 396-406.
11. Chen SH, Tsai YF, Sun CY et al. The impact of self-management support on the progression of chronic kidney disease - a prospective randomised controlled trial. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2011; 26: 3560-3566.
12. Harden PH, Walsh G, Bandler N et al. Bridging the gap: an integrated paediatric to adult clinical service for young adults with kidney failure. British Medical Journal, 2012; 344: e3718.
13. Sullivan C. Impact of Navigators on Completion of Steps in Kidney Transplant Process: a randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2012; 7: 1639-1645.
14. Campbell HS, Phaneuf MR, Deane K. Cancer peer support programs: do they work? Patient Education and Counseling, 2004; 55: 3-15.
15. Solomon P. Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 2004; 27: 392-401.
16. Woolacott N, Orton L, Beynon S, Myers L, Forbes C. Systematic Review of the Clinical Effectiveness of Self Care Support Networks in Health and Social Care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York: York, 2006.
17. Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED. Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psycho-Oncology, 2006; 16: 379-400.
18. Pfeiffer PN, Heister M, Piette JD, Rogers MA, Valenstein M. Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 2011; 1: 29-36.
19. Repper J, Carter T. Review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 2011; 20: 392-411.
20. Dennis CL, Dowswell T. Psychosocial and Psychological Interventions for Preventing Postpartum Depression (Review).The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2013.
21. Dale J, Carmlau IO, Lindenmeyer A, Williams S. Peer Support Telephone Calls for Improving Health. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2008.
22. Hoey L, Ieropoli S, White V, Jefford M. Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 2008; 70: 315-337.
23. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesckis M. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 2004; 328: 1166.
24. Miyamoto Y, Sono T. Lessons from peer support among individuals with mental health difficulties: a review of the literature. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 2012; 8: 22-29.
25. Tweed A, Ceaser K. Renal replacement therapy choices for pre-dialysis renal patients. British Journal of Nursing, 2005; 14: 659-664.
26. Winterbottom A. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic Review. Social Science & Medicine, 2008; 67: 2079-2088.
27. Winterbottom AE, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney AF. Patient stories about their dialysis experience biases others' choices regardless of doctor's advice: an experimental study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2012; 27: 325-331.
28. Liebman SE, Bushinsky DA, Dolan JG, Veazie P. Differences between dialysis modality selection and initiation. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2012; 59: 550-557.
29. Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J et al. How do you modernise a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London. The Milbank Quarterly, 2009; 87: 391-416.
30. Bui LL, Last L, Bradley H. Interest and participation in support group programs among patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Nursing, 2002; 25: 150-157.
31. Grande GE, Myers LB, Sutton SR. How do patients who participate in cancer support groups differ from those who do not? Psycho-Oncology, 2006; 15: 321-334.
32. Voerman B, Visser A, Fischer M et al. Determinants of participation in social support groups for prostrate cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 2007; 16: 1092-1099.
33. Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Care, 3rd edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
34. Christians CG. Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 2000: 133-155.
35. Strauss AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
36. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 1998.
37. Bryant A, Chamaz K. Introduction. Grounded theory research: methods and practices. In: Bryant A, Chamaz K (eds) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Paperback Edition. London: Sage, 2007: 1-28.
38. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. New York: Sage, 2008.
39. Helgeson V, Cohen S, Schultz R, Yasko J. Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: who benefits from what? Health Psychology, 2000; 19: 107-114.
40. Dunn J, Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Wilson K. Evaluation of a peer support program for women with breast cancer - lessons from practitioners. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1999; 9: 13-22.
41. Ussher J, Kirsten L, Butow P, Sandoval M. What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 2006; 62: 2565-2576.
42. Proudfoot JG, Jayawant A, Whitton AE et al. Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 2012; 12: 196.
43. Rook KS. Social networks as a source of social control in older adults' lives. In: Giles H, Coupland N, Wiemann J (eds) Communication, Health, and the Elderly. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1990: 45-63.
44. Cohen S, Gottlieb B, Underwood LG. Social relationships and health. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb B (eds) Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press, 2000: 3-26.
45. Bury M. Chronic illness as a biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 1982; 4: 167-182.
46. Smith SM, Paul G, Kelly A. Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 2011; 42: d.215.
47. Embuldeniya G, Veinot P, Bell E et al. The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: A qualitative synthesis. Patient Education and Counseling, 2013; 92: 3-12.
48. Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S et al. Illness representations: theoretical foundations. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA (eds) Perceptions of Health and Illness. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997: 19-45.