Gross Motor Function Measure-66 trajectories in children recovering after severe acquired brain injury

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 241-247

  Kelly, Gemma ^a   Mobbs, Sue ^a   Pritkin, Joshua N ^b   Mayston, Margaret ^a,c   Mather, Michael ^d   Rosenbaum, Peter ^e   Henderson, Robin ^f   Forsyth, Rob ^d  

^a Tadworth Court   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRIC REHABILITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; BRAIN INJURIES; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN INJURIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84922347061     PISSN: 00121622     EISSN: 14698749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12592     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Asemota AO, George BP, Bowman SM, Haider AH, Schneider EB. Causes and trends in traumatic brain injury for United States adolescents. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30: 67-75.
2. Anonymous. Traumatic brain injury: time to end the silence. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 331.
3. Knoester H, Bronner MB, Bos AP. Surviving pediatric intensive care: physical outcome after 3 months. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1076-82.
4. Forsyth R, Basu AP. The change we want to see: the promotion of recovery after acquired brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12575 [E-pub ahead of print].
5. Forsyth R, Thuy VU, Salorio C, Christensen J, Holford N. Review: efficient rehabilitation trial designs using disease progress modeling: a pediatric traumatic brain injury example. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 225-34.
6. Forsyth RJ, Salorio C, Christensen JR. Modelling early recovery patterns after paediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Dis Child 2010; 95: 266-70.
7. Avery LM, Rosenbaum P, Russell DJ. Criterion validity of the GMFM-66 item set and the GMFM-66 basal and ceiling approaches for estimating GMFM-66 scores. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 534-8.
8. Russell DJ, Avery LM, Rosenbaum P, Lane M. Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 and GMFM-88) Users Manual. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 159. London: Mac Keith Press, 2002.
9. McCauley SR, Wilde EA, Anderson V, et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29: 678-705.
10. Linder-Lucht M, Othmer V, Walther M, et al. Validation of the Gross Motor Function Measure for use in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Pediatrics 2007; 120: e880-6.
11. Beretta E, Cimolin V, Piccinini L, et al. Assessment of gait recovery in children after Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Inj 2009; 23: 751-9.
12. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Hoppe B, Gölge M, Dreesmann M, Damm-Stünitz U, Ritz A. Sensorimotor recovery in children after traumatic brain injury: analyses of gait, gross motor, and fine motor skills. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003; 45: 821-8.
13. Russell DJ, Avery LM, Rosenbaum P, Raina PS, Walter SD, Palisano RJ. Improved scaling of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy: evidence of reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 873-85.
14. Cramer S, Chopp M. Recovery recapitulates ontogeny. Trends Neurosci 2000; 23: 265-71.
15. Rosenbaum P, Avery LM, Russell DJ, Raina PS, Walter SD. Rasch analysis of the Gross Motor Function Measure: validating the assumptions of the Rasch model to create an interval-level measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 697-705.
16. Linacre JM, Wright BD. A User's Guide to BIGSTEPS. Chicago, IL: MESA Press, 1993.
17. Baker FB, Kim S-H. Item Response Theory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004.
18. Boker S, Neale M, Maes H, et al. OpenMx: an open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 2011; 76: 306-17.
19. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. (2014) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models_. R package version 3.1-117, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (accessed 9 September 2014).
20. R Core Development Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2nd edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 9 September 2014).
21. Chen WH, Thissen D. Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. J Educ Behav Stat 1997; 22: 265-89.
22. Heindl U, Laub M. Outcome of persistent vegetative state following hypoxic or traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. Neuropediatrics 2007; 27: 94-100.
23. Forsyth R. Efficient translational rehabilitation randomised controlled trial designs using disease progress modelling and trial simulation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2009; 19: 891-903.
24. Rosenbaum P, Russell DJ, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The Gross Motor Function Measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989; 31: 341-52.
25. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 424-8.
26. Haith AM, Krakauer JW. Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning. Adv Exp Med Biol 2013; 782: 1-21.
27. Varier S, Kaiser M, Forsyth R. Establishing, versus maintaining, brain function: a neuro-computational model of cortical reorganization after injury to the immature brain. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2011; 17: 1030-8.
28. Forsyth R. Would you rather have your brain injury at five or twenty-five? Dev Med Child Neurol 2014; 56: 297.