Strange bedfellows or an aligning of values? Exploration of stakeholder values in an alliance of concerned citizens against coal seam gas mining

Land Use Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 392-399

  Colvin, Rebecca M ^a   Witt, G Bradd ^a   Lacey, Justine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Coal seam gas; Environmentalists; Farmers; Land use conflict; Landholders

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; COAL MINING; COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION; GAS INDUSTRY; LAND USE CONFLICT; LANDHOLDING; POLICY APPROACH; SOCIAL MOVEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84922324354     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Population Distribution 2008, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Chapter3002008 (accessed 15.03.14).
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Demographic Statistics 2012, http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/A535F84F4393C62FCA257AD7000D113E/$File/31010_jun%202012.pdf (accessed 13.03.13).
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Degrees and Certificates more Popular than Ever: Media Release 2012, http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/latestProducts/6227.0Media%20Release1May%202012 (accessed 12.03.13).
4. Arend D.N. Choices (Version 4.0) [Computer Software] 1993, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL, (CERL Report No.CH7-22510).
5. Beeton R.J.S., Lynch A.J.J. Most of nature: a framework to resolve the twin dilemmas of the decline of nature and rural communities. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 23:45-56.
6. Benson J. Aesthetic and other values in the rural landscape. Environ. Values 2008, 17(2):221-238.
7. Bohnet I.C., Roberts B., Harding E., Haug K.J. A typology of graziers to inform a more targeted approach for developing natural resource management policies and agricultural extension programs. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:629-637.
8. Brummans B.H.J.M., Putnam L.L., Gray B., Hanke R., Lewicki R.J., Weithoff C. Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: a study of framing in four environmental disputes. Commun. Monogr. 2008, 75(1):25-51.
9. Curtis A., Lacey T.de. Landcare stewardship and sustainable agriculture in Australia. Environ. Values 1998, 7(1):59-78.
10. de Groot J.I.M., Steg L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behaviour. Environ. Behav. 2007, 40(3):330-354.
11. Department of Agriculture Rural Assurance - Postcode Review 2014, http://www.daff.gov.au/biosecurity/import/general-info/operations-improvements/postcode-review (accessed 15.03.14).
12. Devine-Wright P. Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 19:426-441.
13. Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., Shwom R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30:335-372.
14. Evans L., Maio G.R., Corner A., Hodgetts C.J., Ahmed S. Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nat.: Clim. Change 2013, 3:122-125.
15. Greiner R., Gregg D. Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:257-265.
16. Hamawand I., Yusaf T., Hamawand S.G. Coal seam gas and associated water: a review paper. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 22:550-560.
17. Hansla A., Gamble A., Juliusson A., Gärling T. The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28(1):1-9.
18. Hatton MacDonald D., Morrison M.D., Ward J.R., MacRae A. Do regional natural resource management leaders reflect the attitudes of the landholders?. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:53-61.
19. Haslam S.A. Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach 2000, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. Homer P.M., Kahle L.R. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy. Personal. Process. Individ. Diff. 1988, 54(4):638-646.
21. Hossain D., Gorman D., Chapelle B., Mann W., Saal R., Penton G. Impact of the mining industry on the mental health of landholders and rural communities in southwest Queensland. Australas. Psychiatry 2013, 21(1):31-32.
22. Hutton D. Lock the gate unites: cockies, blockies, croppers and greenies. Chain React. 2012, 115:16-17.
23. Ives C.D., Kendal D. Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:80-90.
24. Karp D.G. Values and their effect on pro-environmental behaviour. Environ. Behav. 1996, 28:111-133.
25. Kollmuss A., Agyeman J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour?. Environ. Educ. Res. 2002, 8(3):239-260.
26. LaBouchardiere R. Integrated Environmental Risk Management: Incorporating Social Perceptions of Risk into Adaptive Management Policy Frameworks for Coal Seam Gas and Associated Water Resource Development in Queensland. Post-Graduate Research Project 2011, University of Queensland.
27. Lacey J., Lamont J. Using social contract to inform social licence to operate: an application in the Australian coal seam gas industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.047.
28. Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases 2003, Island Press, Washington, D.C. R.J. Lewicki, B. Gray, M. Elliott (Eds.).
29. LimeSurvey Project Team, Schmitz C. Lime Survey: An Open Source Survey Tool 2012, LimeSurvey Project, Hamburg, Germany.
30. Lloyd D.J., Luke H., Boyd W.E. Community perspectives of natural resource extraction: coal-seam gas mining and social identity in Eastern Australia. Coolabah 2013, 10:144-164.
31. Lock the Gate Alliance (LTGA) History 2013, http://www.lockthegate.org.au/history (accessed 13.03.13).
32. Lock the Gate Alliance (LTGA) Missions, Principles, Aims 2013, http://www.lockthegate.org.au/missions_principles_aims (accessed 13.03.13).
33. Merchant C. Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World 2005, Routledge, New York. 2nd ed.
34. McVea J.F., Freeman R.E. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: how focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. J. Manage. Enq. 2005, 14(1):57-69.
35. Measham T., Fleming D. Lessons from developments of resource extraction industries in rural areas: a literature review. Report to the Gas Industry Social and Environmental Research Alliance (GISERA), CSIRO 2013, http://www.gisera.org.au/publications/tech_reports_papers/socioeco-proj-1-lit-review.pdf (viewed 01.08.13).
36. Milligan G.W., Cooper M.C. Methodology review: clustering methods. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1987, 11(4):329-354.
37. Moldofsky L. Qld farmers benefit from co-existing with CSG. Australian Financial Review 2012, http://afr.com/p/qld_farmers_benefit_from_co_existing_nSFB6dtJzaSxm52kHjCXHJ (viewed 28.09.12).
38. Murphy K. The Greens' war within. The Sydney Morning Herald 2012, http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/the-greens-war-within-20120930-26tqi.html (viewed 05.09.12).
39. Nordlund A.M., Garvill J. Value structures behind proenvironmental behaviour. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34(6):740-756.
40. Norton B.G., Hannon B. Environmental values: a place-based theory. The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Values 2005, 207-226. Earthscan, London, UK. L. Kalof, T. Satterfield (Eds.).
41. O'Brien C., Burke G. CSG Campaign Heats Up, Groups Say. 612 ABC Brisbane 2012, http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-17/csg-campaign-heats-up-groups-say/3574494/?site=brisbane (viewed 10.09.12).
42. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management 2009.
43. Rowling T. CSG mistakes - we've made a few. Queensland Country Life 2012, http://qcl.farmonline.com.au/news/state/agribusiness-and-general/general/csg-mistakes-weve-made-a-few/2628698.aspx.
44. Schultz P.W., Zelezny L. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. J. Environ. Psychol. 1999, 19:255-265.
45. Schultz P.W., Gouveia V.V., Cameron L.D., Tankha G., Schmuck P., Franek M. Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behaviour. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2005, 36(4):457-475.
46. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992, vol. 25:1-65. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
47. Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J. Soc. Issues 1994, 50(4):19-45.
48. Schwartz S.H., Bilsky W. Toward a psychological structure of human values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 53:550-562.
49. Silmak M.W., Dietz T. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Anal. 2006, 26(6):1689-1705.
50. Spencer L.H. Using cluster analysis to explore survey data. Nurse Res. 2007, 15(1):37-54.
51. Stayner R. A reality check: what is happening in rural Australia?. Australian Values - Rural Policies: Symposium 2000 Proceedings. Australian Values - Rural Policies: Symposium 2000, Canberra, Australia, 28-29 August 2006, 43-59. T. Gleeson, C. Turner, J. Drinan (Eds.).
52. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009, 29:309-317.
53. Stern P. Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1992, 43:269-302.
54. Stern P. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. J. Soc. Issues 2000, 56(3):407-424.
55. Stern P.C., Dietz T. The value basis of environmental concern. J. Soc. Issues 1994, 50(3):65-84.
56. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G.A., Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Res. Hum. Ecol. 1999, 6(2):81-97.
57. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. A brief inventory of values. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1998, 58(6):984-1001.
58. Stern P., Dietz T., Kalof L., Guagnano G. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 25(18):1611-1636.
59. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Kalof L. Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. Environ. Behav. 1993, 25(3):322-348.
60. Tovey J. Rally lets off steam over coal seam gas. The Sydney Morning Herald 2012, http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/rally-lets-off-steam-over-coal-seam-gas-20120501-1xx6z.html (viewed 18.08.12).
61. van der Horst D. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 2007, 35(5):2705-2714.
62. Vanclay F. The social context of farmers' adoption of environmentally sound farming practices. Agriculture, Environment, and Society: Contemporary Issues for Australia 1992, 94-121. Macmillan, Melbourne, Australia. F. Lawrence, F. Vanclay, B. Furze (Eds.).
63. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P., Williams D.R., Jonker S. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2001, 9:761-776.
64. Winter C., Lockwood M. A model for measuring natural area values and park preferences. Environ. Conserv. 2005, 32(3):270-278.
65. Witt K., Lacey J., Witt G.B. Determining the 'public interest' in contested landscapes: who determines what it is and how it is determined?. Paper presented to the Nordic Environmental Social Science Conference 2013.
66. Witt G., Witt K., Carter R., Beeton R. Urban People's Views of Farmers, Rural Land Management and Conservation: Clarifying "The Public Interest" in Rural Land Management and Rural Issues for Better Communication and Relationship Building. St Lucia, Queensland. 2007.