The gastric/pancreatic amylase ratio predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula with high sensitivity and specificity

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2015, Pages e339-

  Jin, Shuo ^a   Shi, Xiao Ju ^a   Sun, Xiao Dong ^a   Zhang, Ping ^a   Lv, Guo Yue ^a   Du, Xiao Hong ^a   Wang, Si Yuan ^b   Wang, Guang Yi ^a  

^a THE FIRST HOSPITAL OF JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA AMYLASE PANCREAS ISOENZYME; AMYLASE; GASTRIC AMYLASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ASCITES; BILE DUCT FISTULA; BLEEDING; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GASTRIC PANCREATIC AMYLASE RATIO; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; UREA NITROGEN BLOOD LEVEL; BLOOD; ENZYMOLOGY; EVALUATION STUDY; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; STOMACH; TIME;

AMYLASES; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84922309897     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000339     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138: 8-13
2. Ho CK, Kleeff J, Friess H, et al. Complications of pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2005; 7: 99-108
3. Oneil Machado N. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management-review. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012; 2012: 602478
4. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, et al. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 443-451
5. Cloyd JM, Kastenberg ZJ, Visser BC, et al. Postoperative serum amylase predicts pancreatic fistula formation following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18: 348-353
6. Sutcliffe RP, Battula N, Haque A, et al. Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2012; 36: 879-883
7. Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, et al. How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? An analysis in 244 consecutive patients. World J Surg. 2009; 33: 2670-2678
8. Relles DM, Richards NG, Bloom JP, et al. Serum blood urea nitrogen and serum albumin on the first postoperative day predict pancreatic fistula and major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17: 326-331
9. Okano K, Kakinoki K, Suto H, et al. Persisting ratio of total amylase output in drain fluid can predict postoperative clinical pancreatic fistula. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011; 18: 815-820
10. Sikkens EC, Cahen DL, de Wit J, et al. Prospective assessment of the influence of pancreatic cancer resection on exocrine pancreatic function. Br J Surg. 2014; 101: 109-113
11. Williams ST, Woltering EA, O'Dorisio TM, et al. Effect of octreotide acetate on pancreatic exocrine function. Am J Surg. 1989; 157: 459-462
12. Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg. 2004; 21: 54-59
13. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Duct-To-mucosa versus endto-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003; 134: 766-771
14. Kingsnorth AN. Duct to mucosa isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy as an improved anastomosis after resection of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989; 169: 451-453
15. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2012; 99: 1050-1061
16. El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg. 2013; 37: 1405-1418
17. Frymerman AS, Schuld J, Ziehen P, et al. Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on surgical outcome-The need for a classification-driven risk management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 14: 711-718
18. Blumgart LH. Blumgart's Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas. 4th ed. 2012: 893-897
19. van den Bos R, Taris R, Scheppink B, et al. Salivary cortisol and alpha-Amylase levels during an assessment procedure correlate differently with risk-Taking measures in male and female police recruits. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013; 7: 219
20. Hashimoto N, Ohyanagi H. Effect of acute portal hypertension on gut mucosa. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002; 49: 1567-1570
21. Lee SE, Yang SH, Jang JY, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer: interrupted vs continuous stitches. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 5351-5356