Electronic health records in mental health research: A framework for developing valid research methods

Psychiatric Services

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 193-196

  Castillo, Enrico G ^a   Olfson, Mark ^a   Pincus, Harold Alan ^a   Vawdrey, David ^b   Stroup, T Scott ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA EXTRACTION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDITY; MENTAL HEALTH; PROCEDURES;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH;

EID: 84922291515     PISSN: 10752730     EISSN: 15579700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400200     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. An Introduction to the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for Eligible Professionals. Baltimore, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, EHR Incentive Programs, 2012. Available at www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EHR-Medicaid-Guide-Remediated-2012.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2014
2. Strategic Research Priorities: Strategic Objective 3.4: Identify and Systematically Study Elements of Personalized Mental Health Care. Bethesda, National Institute of Mental Health, 2008. Available at www.nimh.nih.gov/research-priorities/strategic-objectives/strategy-34.shtml. Accessed April 4, 2014
3. Gur RC, Irani F, Seligman S, et al: Challenges and opportunities for genomic developmental neuropsychology: examples from the Penn-Drexel collaborative battery. Clinical Neuropsychologist 25:1029-1041, 2011
4. Jensen PB, Jensen LJ, Brunak S: Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nature Reviews. Genetics 13:395-405, 2012
5. Perlis RH, Iosifescu DV, Castro VM, et al: Using electronic medical records to enable large-scale studies in psychiatry: treatment resistant depression as a model. Psychological Medicine 42:41-50, 2012
6. Berg M, Goorman E: The contextual nature of medical information. International Journal of Medical Informatics 56:51-60, 1999
7. Edwards A, Hollin I, Barry J, et al: Barriers to cross-institutional health information exchange: a literature review. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 24:22-34, 2010
8. Shoenbill K, Fost N, Tachinardi U, et al: Genetic data and electronic health records: a discussion of ethical, logistical and technological considerations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 21:171-180, 2014
9. Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC). Albany, New York State Department of Health, 2008. Available at www.health.ny.gov/technology/goals-and-activities/evaluation.htm. Accessed April 4, 2014
10. Kern LM, Dhopeshwarkar R, Barrón Y, et al: Measuring the effects of health information technology on quality of care: a novel set of proposed metrics for electronic quality reporting. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 35:359-369, 2009
11. Meystre SM, Savova GK, Kipper-Schuler KC, et al: Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2008:28-144, 2008
12. Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, et al: How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record. American Journal of Medicine 108:642-649, 2000
13. Wasserman RC: Electronic medical records (EMRs), epidemiology, and epistemology: reflections on EMRs and future pediatric clinical research. Academic Pediatrics 11:280-287, 2011
14. Ho LM, McGhee SM, Hedley AJ, et al: The application of a computerized problem-oriented medical record system and its impact on patient care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 55: 47-59, 1999
15. Shivade C, Raghavan P, Fosler-Lussier E, et al: A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 21:221-230, 2014
16. Benchimol EI, Manuel DG, To T, et al: Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64: 821-829, 2011
17. Dean BB, Lam J, Natoli JL, et al: Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review. Medical Care Research and Review 66:611-638, 2009
18. Carnahan RM: Mini-Sentinel's systematic reviews of validated methods for identifying health outcomes using administrative data: summary of findings and suggestions for future research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 21 (suppl 1):90-99, 2012
19. Townsend L, Walkup JT, Crystal S, et al: A systematic review of validated methods for identifying depression using administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 21(suppl 1):163-173, 2012
20. Weiskopf NG, Weng C: Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20:144-151, 2013