Erratum: Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: A general population survey (British Journal of Cancer (2015) 112, (562-566)) doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.643;Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: A general population survey

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 562-566

  Waller, J ^a   Osborne, K ^b   Wardle, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

beliefs about screening; cancer screening; mass screening psychology; screening attitudes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COLON CANCER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED KINGDOM; VERY ELDERLY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONSUMER; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84922261081     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: 15321827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.138     Document Type: Erratum

References (13)

1. Informed Choice about Cancer Screening (2014) http://www.informedchoiceaboutcancerscreening.org/ (accessed 5 March 2014).
2. Arkes HR, Gaissmaier W (2012) Psychological research and the prostatecancer screening controversy. Psychol Sci 23(6): 547-553.
3. Brawley O, Byers T, Chen A, Pignone M, Ransohoff D, Schenk M, Smith R Sox H, Thorson AG, Wender R (2011) New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA 306(22): 2495-2499.
4. Chapple A, Ziebland S, Hewitson P, McPherson A (2008) Why men in the United Kingdom still want the prostate specific antigen test. Qual Health Res 18(1): 56-64.
5. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, Flitcroft K, Irwig L, McCafferty K Salked G (2008) Communicating about screening. BMJ 337: 789-791.
6. Gtzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jrgensen KJ (2009) Breast screening: the facts-or maybe not. BMJ 338: 446-448.
7. Hoffman JR, Cooper RJ (2012) Overdiagnosis of disease: a modern epidemic. Arch Intern Med 172(15): 1123-1124.
8. Jrgensen KJ, Gtzsche PC (2006) Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ 332(7540): 538-541.
9. Richards M (2011) An independent review is under way. BMJ 343: d6843.
10. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler Jr. FJ, Welch HG (2004) Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 291(1): 71-78.
11. SPSS Inc. (2009) Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. SPSS Inc.: Chicago.
12. Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM (2011) The publics response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Forces 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prev Med 40(5): 497-504.
13. von Wagner C, Baio G, Raine R, Snowball J, Morris S, Atkin W Obichere A, Handley G, Logan RF, Rainbow S, Smith S, Halloran S Wardle J (2011) Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. Int J Epidemiol 40(3): 712-718.