Quantitative versus semiquantitative MR imaging of cartilage in blood-induced arthritic ankles: preliminary findings

Pediatric Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 576-586

  Doria, Andrea S ^a,b   Zhang, Ningning ^c   Lundin, Bjorn ^d   Hilliard, Pamela ^a   Man, Carina ^a   Weiss, Ruth ^a   Detzler, Gary ^a   Blanchette, Victor ^a   Moineddin, Rahim ^b   Eckstein, Felix ^e,f   Sussman, Marshall S ^b,g  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^f Chondrometrics GmbH   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ankles; Blood induced arthritis; Blood induced arthropathy; Cartilage; Children; Hemophilia; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANKLE ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BLOOD INDUCED ARTHRITIS; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VON WILLEBRAND DISEASE; ALGORITHM; ANKLE; ARTHRITIS; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHRITIS; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CHILD; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84922226472     PISSN: 03010449     EISSN: 14321998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-013-2872-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Roy S, Ghadially FN (1966) Pathology of experimental haemarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 25:402–415
2. Mainardi CL, Levine PH, Werb Z et al (1978) Proliferative synovitis in hemophilia: biochemical and morphologic observations. Arthritis Rheum 21:137–144
3. Stein H, Duthie RB (1981) The pathogenesis of chronic haemophilic arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63B:601–609
4. Roosendaal G, Vianen ME, van den Berg HM et al (1997) Cartilage damage as a result of hemarthrosis in a human in vitro model. J Rheumatol 24:1350–1354
5. Roosendaal G, Vianen ME, Marx JJ et al (1999) Blood-induced joint damage: a human in vitro study. Arthritis Rheum 42:1025–1032
6. Roosendaal G, Lafeber FP (2006) Pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 12:117–121
7. Doria AS (2010) State-of-the-art imaging techniques for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: present and future. Haemophilia 16:107–114
8. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL et al (1994) Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 192:485–491
9. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Dürr A et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 44:2072–2077
10. Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Englmeier KH et al (1999) Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living. Magn Reson Med 41:529–536
11. Cohen ZA, McCarthy DM, Kwak SD et al (1999) Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthr Cartil 7:95–109
12. Graichen H, Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T et al (2004) Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 50:811–816
13. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K et al (1999) Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 7:265–271
14. Al-Ali D, Graichen H, Faber S et al (2002) Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: precision and inter-subject variability. J Orthop Res 20:249–256
15. Reichenbach S, Yang M, Eckstein F et al (2010) Does cartilage volume or thickness distinguish knees with and without mild radiographic osteoarthritis? The Framingham Study. Ann Rheum Dis 69:143–149
16. Sharma L, Eckstein F, Song J et al (2008) Relationship of meniscal damage, meniscal extrusion, malalignment, and joint laxity to subsequent cartilage loss in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 58:1716–1726
17. Graichen H, Springer V, Flaman T et al (2000) Validation of high-resolution water-excitation magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers. Osteoarthr Cartil 8:106–114
18. Lundin B, Manco-Johnson ML, Ignas DM et al (2012) The International Prophylaxis Study Group. An MRI scale for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy from the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia 18:962–970
19. Buck RJ, Wyman BT, Le Graverand MP et al (2010) An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee. Magn Reson Med 63:680–690
20. Intema F, Van Roermund PM, Marijnissen ACA et al (2011) Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: an open 1-year pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1441–1446
21. Feldman BM, Funk SM, Bergstrom BM et al (2011) Validation of a new pediatric joint scoring system from the international hemophilia prophylaxis study group: validity of the hemophilia joint health score (HJHS). Arthritis Care Res 63:223–230
22. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM (1980) A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop 149:153–159
23. Nuss R, Kilcoyne RF (2003) A magnetic resonance imaging atlas of hemophilic arthropathy, 1st edn. Professional Publishing Group Ltd., New York
24. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W et al (2006) Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 T: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 65:433–441
25. Wirth W, Eckstein F (2008) A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:737–744
26. Hohe J, Ateshian G, Reiser M et al (2002) Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo. Magn Reson Med 47:554–561
27. Moisio KC, Eckstein F, Song J et al (2008) The relationship of denuded subchondral bone area to knee pain severity and incident frequent knee pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16(Suppl 4):S31 (abstract)
28. Frobell RB, Wirth W, Nevitt M et al (2010) Presence, location, type and size of denuded areas of subchondral bone in the knee as a function of radiographic stage of OA - data from the OA initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 18:668–676
29. Eckstein F, Winzheimer M, Hohe J et al (2001) Interindividual variability and correlation among morphological parameters of knee joint cartilage plates: analysis with three-dimensional MR imaging. Osteoarthr Cartil 9:101–111
30. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 404–408
31. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/whatstat/whatstat.htm. Accessed 19 Nov 2013
32. Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Validity of measurements. In: Portney LG, Watkins MP (eds) Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, pp 87–92
33. Hunter DJ, Bowes MA, Eaton XK et al (2010) Can cartilage loss be detected in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with 3-6 months’ observation using advanced image analysis of 3 T MRI? Osteoarthr Cartil 18:677–683
34. Eckstein F, McCulloch CE, Lynch JA et al (2012) For the OA Initiative Investigators Group. How do short-term rates of femorotibial cartilage change compare to long-term changes? Four year follow-up data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:1250–1257
35. Roemer FW, Eckstein F, Guermazi A (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging-based semiquantitative and quantitative assessment in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 35:521–555
36. Eckstein F, Ateshian G, Burgkart R et al (2006) Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:974–983
37. Hilliard P, Blanchette VS, Doria AS et al (2008) The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) correlates highly with radiographic damage (Abstract). Proceedings of the XXVIII International Congress of the World Federation of Hemophilia, Istanbul, Turkey
38. Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M et al (2011) Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med 32:S110–S116
39. Keshava S, Gibikote S, Mohanta A et al (2013) Ultrasound and MRI of growing joints in healthy boys: correlation with ex-vivo phantom measurements (Abstract). Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Radiology, San Antonio, TX