Derivation of pediatric within-individual biological variation by indirect sampling method an LMS approach

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 142, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 657-663

  Loh, Tze Ping ^a   Ranieri, Enzo ^b   Metz, Michael Patrick ^c,d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^b South Australian Neonatal Screening Centre   (Australia)

^c WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biological variation; Indirect sampling; LMS; Pediatric; Reference; Within individual

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; BICARBONATE; BILIRUBIN; CALCIUM; CHLORIDE; CHOLESTEROL; CREATININE; GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE; GLOBULIN; GLUCOSE; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; PHOSPHATE; POTASSIUM; PROTEIN; SERUM ALBUMIN; SODIUM; UREA; URIC ACID;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE BLOOD LEVEL; ANION GAP; ARTICLE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; AUSTRALIA; BICARBONATE BLOOD LEVEL; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; CALCIUM BLOOD LEVEL; CHILD; CHLORIDE BLOOD LEVEL; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DATA MINING; FEMALE; GAMMA GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GLOBULIN BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INDIRECT SAMPLING; LABORATORY TEST; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE BLOOD LEVEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSMOLALITY; PHOSPHATE BLOOD LEVEL; POTASSIUM BLOOD LEVEL; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SODIUM BLOOD LEVEL; UREA BLOOD LEVEL; URIC ACID BLOOD LEVEL; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL BIOLOGICAL VARIATION; AGE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INDIVIDUALITY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELECTION BIAS;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLING STUDIES; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 84922225491     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: 19437722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCPHZLQAEYH94HI     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1989;27:409-437.
2. Westgard JO, Seehafer JJ, Barry PL. Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria. Clin Chem. 1994;40:1909-1914.
3. Rraas T, Petersen PH, Sandberg S. Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. Clin Chem. 2012;58:1306-1313.
4. Bailey D, Bevilacqua V, Colantonio DA, et al. Pediatric within-day biological variation and quality specifications for 38 biochemical markers in the CALIPER cohort. Clin Chem. 2014;60:518-529.
5. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305-1319.
6. Kouri T, Kairisto V, Virtanen A, et al. Reference intervals developed from data for hospitalized patients: computerized method based on combination of laboratory and diagnostic data. Clin Chem. 1994;40:2209-2215.
7. Solberg HE. Using a hospitalized population to establish reference intervals: pros and cons. Clin Chem. 1994;40:2205-2206.
8. Pottel H, Vrydags N, Mahieu B, et al. Establishing age/sex related serum creatinine reference intervals from hospital laboratory data based on different statistical methods. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;396:49-55.
9. Concordet D, Geffr A, Braun JP, et al. A new approach for the determination of reference intervals from hospital-based data. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;405:43-48.
10. Arzideh F, Wosniok W, Haeckel R. Reference limits of plasma and serum creatinine concentrations from intra-laboratory data bases of several German and Italian medical centres: comparison between direct and indirect procedures. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:215-221.
11. Katayev A, Balciza C, Seccombe DW. Establishing reference intervals for clinical laboratory test results: is there a better way? Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:180-186.
12. Henderson MP, Grey V. Establishing and evaluating pediatric thyroid reference intervals on the Roche Modular Analytics E 170 using computational statistics and data-mining techniques. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:767-770.
13. Jones GR. Validating common reference intervals in routine laboratories. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:119-121.
14. Rics C, Iglesias N, Garca-Lario JV, et al. Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences. Ann Clin Biochem. 2007;44:343-352.
15. Shine B. Use of routine clinical laboratory data to define reference intervals. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:467-475.
16. Isojima T, Shimatsu A, Yokoya S, et al. Standardized centile curves and reference intervals of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels in a normal Japanese population using the LMS method. Endocr J. 2012;59:771-780.
17. Loh TP, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, et al. Development of pediatric biochemistry centile charts as a complement to laboratory reference intervals. Pathology. 2014;46:336-343.