Fibrinolysis use among patients requiring interhospital transfer for st-segment elevation myocardial infarction care a report from the us national cardiovascular data registry

JAMA Internal Medicine

Volumn 175, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 207-215

  Vora, Amit N ^a   Holmes, Dajuanicia N ^b   Rokos, Ivan ^c   Roe, Matthew T ^d   Granger, Christopher B ^e   French, William J ^f   Antman, Elliott ^a   Henry, Timothy D ^b   Thomas, Laine ^c   Bates, Eric R ^d   Wang, Tracy Y ^a  

^a DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; FEMALE; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENTS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; PATIENT TRANSFER; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922221748     PISSN: 21686106     EISSN: 21686114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6573     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. OGara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al; American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevationmyocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J AmColl Cardiol. 2013;61(4):e78-e140
2. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acutemyocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):13-20
3. Jacobs AK, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Gregory T, Solis P. Development of systems of care for ST-elevationmyocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation. 2007;116(2):217-230
4. Concannon TW, Nelson J, Goetz J, Griffith JL. A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(1): 14-20
5. Henry TD, Sharkey SW, Burke MN, et al. A regional system to provide timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevationmyocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;116(7):721-728
6. Jollis JG, Roettig ML, Aluko AO, et al; Reperfusion of AcuteMyocardial Infarction in North Carolina Emergency Departments (RACE) Investigators. Implementation of a statewide system for coronary reperfusion for ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;298 (20):2371-2380
7. Wang TY, Peterson ED, Ou FS, Nallamothu BK, Rumsfeld JS, RoeMT. Door-to-balloon times for patients with ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction requiring interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Am Heart J. 2011;161(1):76-83.e1
8. Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrires J, et al; FAST-MI Investigators. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the French Registry on Acute ST-ElevationMyocardial Infarction (FAST-MI). Circulation. 2008;118(3):268-276
9. Kalla K, Christ G, Karnik R, et al; Vienna STEMI Registry Group. Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: the Viennese Registry on Reperfusion Strategies in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Vienna STEMI Registry). Circulation. 2006;113(20):2398-2405
10. LeMay MR, So DY, Dionne R, et al. A citywide protocol for primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(3): 231-240
11. McLean S, Egan G, Connor P, Flapan AD. Collaborative decision-making between paramedics and CCU nurses based on 12-lead ECG telemetry expedites the delivery of thrombolysis in ST elevationmyocardial infarction. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(6):370-374
12. Eagle KA, Nallamothu BK, Mehta RH, et al; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Investigators. Trends in acute reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction from 1999 to 2006: we are getting better but we have got a long way to go. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(5): 609-617
13. Gibson CM, Pride YB, FreDerick PD, et al. Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J. 2008;156(6):1035-1044
14. Ting HH, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, et al. Regional systems of care to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for ST-elevationmyocardial infarction: theMayo Clinic STEMI protocol. Circulation. 2007;116(7):729-736
15. Messenger JC, Ho KK, Young CH, et al; NCDR Science and Quality Oversight Committee Data QualityWorkgroup. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(16):1484-1488
16. Health Forum. AHA Guide 2013 (American Hospital Association Guide to the Health Care Field). Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association; 2012. http://www.ahadataviewer.com/book-cd-products/AHA-Guide. Accessed October 30, 2014
17. Mathews R, Peterson ED, Chen AY, et al. In-hospital major bleeding during ST-elevation and non-ST-elevationmyocardial infarction care: Derivation and validation of a model from the ACTION Registry-GWTG. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(8): 1136-1143
18. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42(1):121-130
19. Chin CT, Chen AY,Wang TY, et al. Risk adjustment for in-hospital mortality of contemporary patients with acutemyocardial infarction: the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry-Get With the Guidelines (GWTG) acute myocardial infarction mortality model and risk score. Am Heart J. 2011;161(1):113-122.e2
20. CantorWJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, et al; TRANSFER-AMI Trial Investigators. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acutemyocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(26):2705-2718
21. Huber K, Goldstein P, Danchin N, et al. Enhancing the efficacy of delivering reperfusion therapy: a European and North American experience with ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction networks. Am Heart J. 2013;165(2):123-132
22. Redberg RF. ReconsiDering transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention strategy: time is of the essence. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(2):98-99
23. Miedema MD, Newell MC, Duval S, et al. Causes of delay and associated mortality in patients transferred with ST-segment-elevationmyocardial infarction. Circulation. 2011;124(15):1636-1644
24. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Parsons L, et al. Application of the TIMI risk score for ST-elevation MI in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. JAMA. 2001;286(11):1356-1359
25. ClaeysMJ, de Meester A, Convens C, et al. Contemporary mortality differences between primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):544-549
26. Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, et al; STREAM Investigative Team. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(15):1379-1387
27. Rokos IC, Henry TD,Weittenhiller B, Bjerke CM, Bates ER, FrenchWJ.Mission: Lifeline STEMI networks geospatial information systems (GIS) maps. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013;12(2):43-44
28. Bohmer E, Hoffmann P, Abdelnoor M, Arnesen H, Halvorsen S. Efficacy and safety of immediate angioplasty versus ischemia-guided management after thrombolysis in acutemyocardial infarction in areas with very long transfer distances: results of the NORDISTEMI (Norwegian Study on District Treatment of ST-ElevationMyocardial Infarction). J AmColl Cardiol. 2010;55(2):102-110
29. Borgia F, Goodman SG, Halvorsen S, et al. Early routine percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis vs standard therapy in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction: ameta-Analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(17):2156-2169
30. Larson DM, Duval S, Sharkey SW, et al. Safety and efficacy of a pharmaco-invasive reperfusion strategy in rural ST-elevationmyocardial infarction patients with expected delays due to long-distance transfers. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(10):1232-1240
31. Burjonroppa SC, Varosy PD, Rao SV, et al. Survival of patients unDergoing rescue percutaneous coronary intervention: development and validation of a predictive tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(1):42-50