Flavored dark matter beyond Minimal Flavor Violation

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Agrawal, Prateek ^a   Blanke, Monika ^b   Gemmler, Katrin ^a  

^a FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

B Physics; Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Kaon Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922196533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2014)072     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. J. Kile and A. Soni, Flavored Dark Matter in Direct Detection Experiments and at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 035016 [arXiv: 1104. 5239] [INSPIRE].
2. J. F. Kamenik and J. Zupan, Discovering Dark Matter Through Flavor Violation at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 111502 [arXiv: 1107. 0623] [INSPIRE].
3. B. Batell, J. Pradler and M. Spannowsky, Dark Matter from Minimal Flavor Violation, JHEP 08 (2011) 038 [arXiv: 1105. 1781] [INSPIRE].
4. P. Agrawal, S. Blanchet, Z. Chacko and C. Kilic, Flavored Dark Matter and Its Implications for Direct Detection and Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055002 [arXiv: 1109. 3516] [INSPIRE].
5. B. Batell, T. Lin and L.-T. Wang, Flavored Dark Matter and R-Parity Violation, JHEP 01 (2014) 075 [arXiv: 1309. 4462] [INSPIRE].
6. J. Kile, Flavored Dark Matter: A Review, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1330031 [arXiv: 1308. 0584] [INSPIRE].
7. L. Lopez-Honorez and L. Merlo, Dark matter within the minimal flavour violation ansatz, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 135 [arXiv: 1303. 1087] [INSPIRE].
8. A. Kumar and S. Tulin, Top-flavored dark matter and the forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 095006 [arXiv: 1303. 0332] [INSPIRE].
9. Y. Zhang, Top Quark Mediated Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 720 (2013) 137 [arXiv: 1212. 2730] [INSPIRE].
10. M. Hirsch, S. Morisi, E. Peinado and J. W. F. Valle, Discrete dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116003 [arXiv: 1007. 0871] [INSPIRE].
11. 4 Flavor Symmetry, JHEP 05 (2011) 037 [arXiv: 1101. 2874] [INSPIRE].
12. L. E. Ibáñez, The Scalar Neutrinos as the Lightest Supersymmetric Particles and Cosmology, Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 160 [INSPIRE].
13. J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric Relics from the Big Bang, Nucl. Phys. B 238 (1984) 453 [INSPIRE].
14. J. S. Hagelin, G. L. Kane and S. Raby, Perhaps Scalar Neutrinos Are the Lightest Supersymmetric Partners, Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 638 [INSPIRE].
15. M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3059 [INSPIRE].
16. K. Freese, Can Scalar Neutrinos Or Massive Dirac Neutrinos Be the Missing Mass?, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 295 [INSPIRE].
17. T. Falk, K. A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Heavy sneutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 339 (1994) 248 [hep-ph/9409270] [INSPIRE].
18. J. March-Russell, C. McCabe and M. McCullough, Neutrino-Flavoured Sneutrino Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 108 [arXiv: 0911. 4489] [INSPIRE].
19. T. Daylan et al., The Characterization of the Gamma-Ray Signal from the Central Milky Way: A Compelling Case for Annihilating Dark Matter, arXiv: 1402. 6703 [INSPIRE].
20. A. Berlin, D. Hooper and S. D. McDermott, Simplified Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 115022 [arXiv: 1404. 0022] [INSPIRE].
21. P. Agrawal, B. Batell, D. Hooper and T. Lin, Flavored Dark Matter and the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 063512 [arXiv: 1404. 1373] [INSPIRE].
22. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic and B. Shuve, The Galactic Center Excess from the Bottom Up, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 055002 [arXiv: 1404. 2018] [INSPIRE].
23. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, C. McCabe, M. Spannowsky and C. J. Wallace, Extended gamma-ray emission from Coy Dark Matter, JCAP 05 (2014) 009 [arXiv: 1401. 6458] [INSPIRE].
24. S. Ipek, D. McKeen and A. E. Nelson, A Renormalizable Model for the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 055021 [arXiv: 1404. 3716] [INSPIRE].
25. K. Kong and J.-C. Park, Bounds on Dark Matter Interpretation of Fermi-LAT GeV Excess, arXiv: 1404. 3741 [INSPIRE].
26. P. Ko, W.-I. Park and Y. Tang, Higgs portal vector dark matter for GeV scale-ray excess from galactic center, JCAP 09 (2014) 013 [arXiv: 1404. 5257] [INSPIRE].
27. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan and C. McCabe, A weighty interpretation of the Galactic Centre excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023531 [arXiv: 1404. 4977] [INSPIRE].
28. M. Abdullah et al., Hidden On-Shell Mediators for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 035004 [arXiv: 1404. 6528] [INSPIRE].
29. D. K. Ghosh, S. Mondal and I. Saha, Confronting the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess With a Light Scalar Dark Matter, arXiv: 1405. 0206 [INSPIRE].
30. A. Martin, J. Shelton and J. Unwin, Fitting the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess with Cascade Annihilations, arXiv: 1405. 0272 [INSPIRE].
31. A. Berlin, P. Gratia, D. Hooper and S. D. McDermott, Hidden Sector Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015032 [arXiv: 1405. 5204] [INSPIRE].
32. T. Basak and T. Mondal, Class of Higgs-portal Dark Matter models in the light of gamma-ray excess from Galactic center, arXiv: 1405. 4877 [INSPIRE].
33. K. P. Modak, D. Majumdar and S. Rakshit, A Possible Explanation of Low Energy-ray Excess from Galactic Centre and Fermi Bubble by a Dark Matter Model with Two Real Scalars, arXiv: 1312. 7488 [INSPIRE].
34. R. S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite Technicolor Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 188 (1987) 99 [INSPIRE].
35. L. J. Hall and L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2939 [INSPIRE].
36. A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].
37. G. D'Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
38. A. J. Buras, Minimal flavor violation, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 5615 [hep-ph/0310208] [INSPIRE].
39. LUX collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv: 1310. 8214] [INSPIRE].
40. J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia and D. Sanford, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 124 [arXiv: 1102. 4331] [INSPIRE].
41. J. L. Feng, J. Kumar and D. Sanford, Xenophobic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015021 [arXiv: 1306. 2315] [INSPIRE].
42. M. Blanke et al., Another look at the flavour structure of the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 253 [hep-ph/0609284] [INSPIRE].
43. q decays in the Left-Right Model: Higgs particles striking back, JHEP 03 (2012) 024 [arXiv: 1111. 5014] [INSPIRE].
44. A. J. Buras and J. Girrbach, Towards the Identification of New Physics through Quark Flavour Violating Processes, Rept. Prog. Phys. 77 (2014) 086201 [arXiv: 1306. 3775] [INSPIRE].
45. A. J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach and M. V. Carlucci, The Anatomy of Quark Flavour Observables in 331 Models in the Flavour Precision Era, JHEP 02 (2013) 023 [arXiv: 1211. 1237] [INSPIRE].
46. J. Virto, Exact NLO strong interaction corrections to the ΔF = 2 effective Hamiltonian in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2009) 055 [arXiv: 0907. 5376] [INSPIRE].
47. S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero and G. Ridolfi, Effects of supergravity induced electroweak breaking on rare B decays and mixings, Nucl. Phys. B 353 (1991) 591 [INSPIRE].
48. - decay in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 3329 [hep-ph/9601360] [INSPIRE].
49. W. Altmannshofer and D. M. Straub, New physics in B → K*μμ?, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2646 [arXiv: 1308. 1501] [INSPIRE].
50. J. F. Kamenik and C. Smith, FCNC portals to the dark sector, JHEP 03 (2012) 090 [arXiv: 1111. 6402] [INSPIRE].
51. S. M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron and of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21 [Erratum ibid. 65 (1990) 2920] [INSPIRE].
52. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., The UTfit collaboration report on the status of the unitarity triangle beyond the standard model. I. Model-independent analysis and minimal flavor violation, JHEP 03 (2006) 080 [hep-ph/0509219] [INSPIRE]. Updates available on http://www. utfit. org.
53. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., Model-independent constraints on ΔF = 2 operators and the scale of new physics, JHEP 03 (2008) 049 [arXiv: 0707. 0636] [INSPIRE].
54. +μ data, JHEP 02 (2014) 112 [arXiv: 1311. 6729] [INSPIRE].
55. J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee and G. Paz, The Flavor of a little Higgs with T-parity, JHEP 06 (2006) 041 [hep-ph/0512169] [INSPIRE].
56. s, d in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity, JHEP 12 (2006) 003 [hep-ph/0605214] [INSPIRE].
57. M. Blanke, A. J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Recksiegel and C. Tarantino, FCNC Processes in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-Parity: a 2009 Look, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 657 [arXiv: 0906. 5454] [INSPIRE].
58. C. Csáki, A. Falkowski and A. Weiler, The Flavor of the Composite Pseudo-Goldstone Higgs, JHEP 09 (2008) 008 [arXiv: 0804. 1954] [INSPIRE].
59. M. Blanke, A. J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Gori and A. Weiler, ΔF = 2 Observables and Fine-Tuning in a Warped Extra Dimension with Custodial Protection, JHEP 03 (2009) 001 [arXiv: 0809. 1073] [INSPIRE].
60. M. Bauer, S. Casagrande, U. Haisch and M. Neubert, Flavor Physics in the Randall-Sundrum Model: II. Tree-Level Weak-Interaction Processes, JHEP 09 (2010) 017 [arXiv: 0912. 1625] [INSPIRE].
61. Y. Zhang, H. An, X. Ji and R. N. Mohapatra, General CP-violation in Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model and Constraints on the Right-Handed Scale, Nucl. Phys. B 802 (2008) 247 [arXiv: 0712. 4218] [INSPIRE].
62. G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [arXiv: 1002. 0900] [INSPIRE].
63. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191 [INSPIRE].
64. G. Servant and T. M. P. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071] [INSPIRE].
65. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta and J. F. Beacom, Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506 [arXiv: 1204. 3622] [INSPIRE].
66. CMS collaboration, Search for direct production of bottom squark pairs, CMS-PAS-SUS-13-018 (2014).
67. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in the multijet and missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 8TeV, JHEP 06 (2014) 055 [arXiv: 1402. 4770] [INSPIRE].
68. M. Krämer et al., Supersymmetry production cross sections in pp collisions at √ s = 7TeV, arXiv: 1206. 2892 [INSPIRE].
69. M. Blanke, G. F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, G. Perez and J. Zupan, Flavoured Naturalness, JHEP 06 (2013) 022 [arXiv: 1302. 7232] [INSPIRE].
70. P. Agrawal and C. Frugiuele, Mixing stops at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2014) 115 [arXiv: 1304. 3068] [INSPIRE].
71. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at √ s = 8TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 (2013).
72. CMS collaboration, Search for top squarks decaying to a charm quark and a neutralino in events with a jet and missing transverse momentum, CMS-PAS-SUS-13-009 (2014).
73. P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, R. Primulando and C.-T. Yu, Taking a Razor to Dark Matter Parameter Space at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015010 [arXiv: 1203. 1662] [INSPIRE].
74. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry with razor variables in pp collisions at √ s = 7TeV, arXiv: 1405. 3961 [INSPIRE].
75. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083502 [arXiv: 0907. 3159] [INSPIRE].