Information and Impossibilities

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 488-515

  Barwise, Jon ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922166077     PISSN: 00294527     EISSN: 19390726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1039540766     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barwise, J., and J. Etchemendy, Hyperproof, CSLI, Stanford, 1994.
2. Barwise, J., and J. Etchemendy, “Computers, visualization, and the nature of reasoning”, forthcoming in How Computers are Changing Philosophy, edited by T. W. Bynumand J. H. Moor, Blackwell, London.3.6.
3. Barwise, J., and J. Seligman, Information Flow in Distributed Systems, Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
4. Dretske, F., Knowledge and the Flow of Information, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1981.
5. Dunn, M., “Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and coupled trees,” Philosophical Studies, vol. 29 (1976), pp. 149-68.
6. Kripke, S., “Semantic analysis of modal logic II: non-normal modal propositional calculi,” pp. 206-20 in The Theory of Models, edited by J. W. Addison, L. Henkin, and A. Tarski, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965.
7. Lewis, D., Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1973.
8. Lycan, W. G., Modality and Meaning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994.
9. Partee, B., “Situations, worlds, and contexts,” Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 8 (1985), pp. 53-58.
10. Shannon, C., “The mathematical theory of communication,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27 (1948), pp. 379-423, 623-56.
11. Sloman, A., “Musings on the roles of logical and non-logical representations in intelligence,” pp. 7-32 in Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, edited by J. I. Glasgow, N. H. Narayan, and B. Chandrasekaran, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991.
12. Stalnaker, R., Inquiry, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1981.
13. Stalnaker, R., “Impossibilities,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 24 (1996), pp. 193-204.
14. Yablo, S., “Is conceivability a guide to possibility?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 52 (1993), pp. 1-42.
15. Yagisawa, T., “Beyond possible worlds,” Philosophical Studies, vol. 53 (1988), pp. 175-204.