Nationality: Some replies

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-82

  Miller, David ^a  

^a NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922149353     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00041     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. D. Miller (1993) In Defence of Nationality, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 10, 3–16.
2. M. Freeman (1994) Nation-State and Cosmopolis: A Response to David Miller, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11, 79–87;
3. J. O'Neill (1994) Should Communitarians be Nationalists?, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11, 135–143;
4. C. Jones (1996) Revenge of the Philosophical Mole: Another Response to David Miller on Nationality, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 13, 73–86;
5. D. M. Weinstock (1996) Is there a Moral Case for Nationalism?, Journal of Applied Philosophy 13, 87–98.
6. J. Rawls (1993) Political Liberalism (New York, Columbia University Press), Lecture VII, sect.
7. M. Canovan (1996) Nationhood and Political Theory (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, ch. 4).
8. Most fully in (1995) On Nationality (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
9. H. Sidgwick (1963) The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. (London, Macmillan), pp. 489–90.
10. B. Williams (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London, Fontana), p. 108.
11. G. Klosko (1993) Rawls’s ‘political’ philosophy and American democracy, American Political Science Review, 87, 348–59.
12. S. Caney (1992) Liberalism and communitarianism: a misconceived debate, Political Studies, 40, 273–89.
13. M. Sandel (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), p. 150.
14. M. Walzer (1983) Spheres of Justice (Oxford, Martin Robertson).
15. I. Berlin (1969) Four Essays on Liberty (London, Oxford University Press), p. 172.
16. Jeremy Waldron (1992–3) in Superseding historic injustice, Ethics, 103, 4–28.
17. Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 128