메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 57-

Response to “The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations”

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84922130096     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.1.012     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (5)

References (3)
  • 1
    • 84901392335 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The ethics of scholarly publishing: Exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations
    • Apr
    • Amos KA. The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations. J Med Lib Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):87-91. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.005.
    • (2014) J Med Lib Assoc , vol.102 , Issue.2 , pp. 87-91
    • Amos, K.A.1
  • 2
    • 84922184380 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Plagiarism in translated publication [Internet]
    • [cited 9 Sep 2014]
    • Wiwanitkit V. Plagiarism in translated publication [Internet]. BMJ. 2009; 339:b3813 [cited 9 Sep 2014]., http:// www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/ 02/plagiarism-translated-publication.
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.339
    • Wiwanitkit, V.1
  • 3
    • 84879967616 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why has the number of scientific retractions increased
    • Jul 8
    • Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang FC. Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e68397.
    • (2013) PLoS One , vol.8 , Issue.7
    • Steen, R.G.1    Casadevall, A.2    Fang, F.C.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.