Some Core Contested Concepts

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 91-104

  Chomsky, Noam ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biolinguistic; Generation; I language; Minimalist program; Structure dependence

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84922104373     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: 15736555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-014-9331-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.
2. Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Berwick, Robert C., Chomsky, N., & Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2012). Poverty of the stimulus stands: Why recent challenges fail. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini & R. C. Berwick (Eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Berwick, R., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., & Chomsky. N. (2011). Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. Cognitive Science, 35, 1207–1242.
5. Bloomfield, L. (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language, Language 2.3. Republished as chapter B21 in C. F. Hockett (Ed.), A Leonard Bloomfield anthology (pp. 153–164). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
6. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
8. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT working papers in linguistics, 27–32. Reprinted. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2000).
10. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In: R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130(June), 33–49.
13. Clayton, N., Emery, N., & Dickinson, A. (2006). The rationality of animal memory: Complex caching strategies of western scrub jays. In M. Nuuds & S. Hurley (Eds.), Rational animals? (pp. 197–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Enfield, N. J. (2010). Without social context? (a review of W. Tecumseh Fitch’s the evolution of language). Science, 329, 1600–1601.
15. Franklin, A., Giannakidou, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system. Cognition, 118(3), 398–416. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.017.
16. Gallistel, C. R., & King, A. P. (2011). Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
17. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Watching language grow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(7), 2271–2272.
18. Greenberg, J. H. (Ed.). (1966). Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Hale, K. (1973). Deep-structure canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: An Australian example. In Thomas Sebeok (Ed.), Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics (pp. 401–458). The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
20. Hale, K. (1975). Gaps in grammar and culture. In: C. F. Voegelin, M. D. Kinkade, K. L. Hale, & O. Werner (Eds.), In Linguistics and anthropology: in honor of C.f. Voegelin (pp. 295–316). Ghent, Belgium: Peter de Ridder/John Benjamins.
21. Kam, X. N., Stoyneshka, I., Tornyova, L., Fodor, J. D., & Sakas, W. G. (2007). Bigrams and the richness of the stimulus. Cognitive Science, 32(4), 771–787.
22. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
23. Moro, A. (2000). Dynamic antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Moro, A. (2013). The equilibrium of human syntax: Symmetries in the brain. Abingdon, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
25. Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Büchel, C., et al. (2003). Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 774–781.
26. Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B., & Lee, R. G. (2000). The syntax of American sign language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Polinsky, M. (2013). Raising and control. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2013.
28. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Translation and meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Methodological reflections on modern linguistic theory. Synthese, 21, 386–98.
30. Rizzi, L. (2010). On some properties of criterial freezing. In E. P. Panagiotidis (Ed.), The complementizer phrase (pp. 17–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Rizzi, L. (2014). Cartography, criteria, and labeling. University of Geneva, University of Siena.
32. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
33. Sauerland, U., & Gärtner, H. (Eds.). (2007). Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
34. Smith, N. V., & Tsimpli, I. (1995). The mind of a savant. New York and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35. Smith, N. V., Tsimpli, I., & Ouhalla, J. (1993). Learning the impossible: The acquisition of possible and impossible languages by a polyglot savant. Lingua, 91, 279–347.
36. Whitney, W. D. (1873). The science of language. In: Oriental and linguistic studies: First series. New York: Scribner, Armstrong, and Company.