Comparison of efficacy of three surgical methods of conjunctival autograft fixation in the treatment of pterygium

International Ophthalmology

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1233-1239

  Sati, Alok ^a   Shankar, Sandeep ^a   Jha, Ashok ^a   Kalra, Deepak ^a   Mishra, Sanjay ^b   Gurunadh, V S ^c  

^a Dept of Plastic Surgery   (India)

^b ARMY HOSPITAL RESEARCH AND REFERRAL   (India)

^c ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Autologous insitu blood coagulum assisted autografting; Fibrin glue assisted autografting; Pterygium; Suture assisted autografting

Indexed keywords

FIBRIN GLUE; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; APPLICATION SITE IRRITATION; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; AUTOLOGOUS IN SITU BLOOD COAGULUM; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYST; EPIPHORA; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; GRAFT DISPLACEMENT; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; GRAFT RETRACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POLYGLACTIN SUTURE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PTERYGIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENCE RISK; SCLERA; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; CONJUNCTIVA; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECURRENT DISEASE; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONJUNCTIVA; FEMALE; FIBRIN TISSUE ADHESIVE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PTERYGIUM; RECURRENCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TISSUE ADHESIVES; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 84922074866     PISSN: 01655701     EISSN: 15732630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-0013-y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jaros PA, Deluise VP (1988) Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol 33:41–49
2. Viani GA, Fonseca EC, De Fendi LI et al (2012) Conjunctival autograft alone or combined with adjuvant beta-radiation? A randomized clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:507–511
3. Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, Fromer S et al (2003) Subconjunctival mitomycin C as adjunctive therapy before pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 110:1012–1016
4. Rubinfeld RS, Pfister RR, Stein RM et al (1992) Serious complications of topical mitomycin-C after pterygium surgery. Ophthalmology 99:1647–1654
5. Yu CM, Liang WL, Huang YY et al (2011) Comparison of clinical efficacy of three surgical methods in the treatment of pterygium. Eye Sci 26:193–196
6. Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME (1985) Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 92:1461–1470
7. Chen PP, Ariyasu RG, Kaza V et al (1995) A randomized trial comparing mitomycin C and conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium. Am J Ophthalmol 120:151–160
8. Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G et al (1997) Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 104:974–985
9. Al Fayez MF (2002) Limbal versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology 109:1752–1755
10. Marticorena J, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Tourino R et al (2006) Pterygium surgery; conjunctival autograft using fibrin adhesive. Cornea 25:34–36
11. Uy HS, Reyes JMG, Flores JDG et al (2005) Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 112:667–671
12. Bahar I, Weinberger D, Dan G et al (2006) Pterygium surgery: fibrin glue versus vicryl sutures for conjunctival closure. Cornea 25:1168–1172
13. Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED (2005) The cut-and-paste method for primary pterygium surgery: long-term follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:298–301
14. Wit D, Athanasiadis I, Sharma A et al (2010) Sutureless and glue free conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a case series. Eye 24:1474–1477
15. Malik KPS, Goel R, Gupta A et al (2012) Efficacy of sutureless and glue free limbal conjunctival autograft for primary pterygium surgery. Nepal J Ophthalmol 24:230–235
16. Singh PK, Singh S, Vyas C, Singh M (2013) Conjunctival Autografting without Fibrin Glue or Sutures for Pterygium Surgery. Cornea 32:104–107
17. Tan DT, Chee SP, Dear KB, Lim AS (1997) Effect of pterygium morphology on pterygium recurrence in a controlled trial comparing conjunctival autografting with bare sclera excision. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1235–1240
18. Lim-Bon-Siong R, Valluri S, Gordon M et al (1998) Efficacy and safety of the ProTek (Vifilcon A) therapeutic soft contact lens after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 125:169–176
19. Cagatay HH, Gokce G, Ekinci M et al (2014) Long-term comparison of fibrin tissue glue and vicryl suture in conjunctival autografting for pterygium surgery. Postgrad Med 126:97–103
20. Hall RC, Logan AJ, Wells AP (2009) Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:584–589
21. Pan HW, Zhong JX, Jing CX (2011) Comparison of fibrin glue versus suture for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 118:1049–1054
22. Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA et al (2008) Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1206–1210
23. Choudhury S, Dutta J, Mukhopadhyay S et al (2014) Comparison of autologous in situ blood coagulum versus sutures for conjunctival autografting after pterygium excision. Int Ophthalmol 34:41–48
24. Cha DM, Kim KH, Hyuk Jin Choi HJ et al (2012) A Comparative study of the effect of fibrin glue versussutures on clinical outcome in patients undergoing pterygium excision and conjunctival autografts. Korean J Ophthalmol 26:407–413