Recommendations for radiological diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in lung cancer: a national consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Clinical and Translational Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 11-23

  de Castro, J ^a   Cobo, M ^b   Isla, D ^c   Puente, J ^d   Reguart, N ^e   Cabeza, B ^d   Gayete, A ^f   Sanchez M ^e   Torres, M I ^a   Ferreiros J ^d  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL REGIONAL UNIVERSITARIO DE MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^c Spain Isabel_mp91 hotmailcom   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^f HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

Author keywords

irRC; Lung neoplasm; MDCT; Radiology report; RECIST 1.1; TNM staging

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM;

ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONSENSUS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; LUNG CANCER; LUNG CAVITATION; LUNG FIBROSIS; LUNG PERFUSION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOLOGY; PRIMARY TUMOR; PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT; RADIATION INJURY; RADIATION PNEUMONIA; RADIODIAGNOSIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR NECROSIS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; FIBROSIS; IMMUNOTHERAPY; LUNG NEOPLASMS; NECROSIS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERFUSION; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; SPAIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; FIBROSIS; HUMANS; IMMUNOTHERAPY; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NECROSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PERFUSION; PROGNOSIS; RADIATION PNEUMONITIS; RADIOLOGY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SPAIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84922074619     PISSN: 1699048X     EISSN: 16993055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1231-5     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC; 2012.
2. Fraioli F, Anzidei M, Zaccagna F, Mennini ML, Serra G, Gori B, et al. Whole-tumor perfusion CT in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with conventional and antiangiogenetic chemotherapy: initial experience. Radiology. 2011;259:574–82.
3. Yuan X, Zhang J, Quan C, Cao J, Ao G, Tian Y, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with first-pass dual-input perfusion CT. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2469–74.
4. Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C, Goetti R, Flohr T, Russi EW, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2597–606.
5. Lu GM, Zhao Y, Zhang LJ, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S40–53.
6. Calzado Cantera A, Hernández-Girón I, Salvadó Artells M, Rodríguez González R. Estado actual y tendencia en el desarrollo tecnológico para la reducción de dosis en los equipos de tomografía computarizada. Radiología. 2013;55:9–16.
7. Directiva 2013/59 Euratom del consejo de 5 de diciembre de 2013 por la que se establecen las normas de seguridad básicas para la protección contra los peligros derivados de la exposición a radiaciones ionizantes y se derogan las directivas 89/618 Euratom, 97/43 Euratom, 96/29 Euratom, 97/43 Euratom y 2003/122 Euratom. Art 60/61. Diario oficial de la unión europea 17 de Enero 2014.
8. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology. 2007;245:742–50.
9. Yilmaz MH, Albayram S, Yasar D, Ozer H, Adaletli I, Selcuk D, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:138–42.
10. Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK Jr. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:333–40.
11. Pahade JK, Litmanovich D, Pedrosa I, Romero J, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM. Quality initiatives: imaging pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2009;29:639–54.
12. Dewachter P, Laroche D, Mouton-Faivre C, Bloch-Morot E, Cercueil JP, Metge L, et al. Immediate reactions following iodinated contrast media injection: a study of 38 cases. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77:495–501.
13. Liccardi G, Lobefalo G, Di Florio E, Di Iorio C, Occhiochiuso L, Romano L, et al. Strategies for the prevention of asthmatic, anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions during the administration of anesthetics and/or contrast media. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2008;18:1–11.
14. Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC. Allergic-like breakthrough reactions to gadolinium contrast agents after corticosteroid and antihistamine premedication. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:187–90.
15. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on contrast media. 2014 http://www.esur.org/esur-guidelines/. Accessed May 2014.
16. Alexopoulos E, Spargias K, Kyrzopoulos S, Manginas A, Pavlides G, Voudris V, et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing a coronary procedure and receiving non-ionic low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media. Am J Med Sci. 2010;339:25–30.
17. Jost G, Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, Hutter J, Sieber MA. The impact of the viscosity and osmolality of iodine contrast agents on renal elimination. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:255–61.
18. Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT. The new lung cancer staging system. Chest. 2009;136:260–71.
19. Nair A, Klusmann MJ, Jogeesvaran KH, Grubnic S, Green SJ, Vlahos I. Revisions to the TNM staging of non-small cell lung cancer: rationale, clinicoradiologic implications, and persistent limitations. Radiographics. 2011;31:215–38.
20. Herth F, Ernst A, Schulz M, Becker H. Endobronchial ultrasound reliably differentiates between airway infiltration and compression by tumor. Chest. 2003;123:458–62.
21. Fibla JJ, Cassivi SD, Brunelli A, Decker PA, Allen MS, Darling GE, et al. Re-evaluation of the prognostic value of visceral pleura invasion in Stage IB non-small cell lung cancer using the prospective multicenter ACOSOG Z0030 trial data set. Lung Cancer. 2012;78:259–62.
22. Kawase A, Yoshida J, Ishii G, Hishida T, Nishimura M, Nagai K. Visceral pleural invasion classification in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1784–8.
23. Glazer HS, Duncan-Meyer J, Aronberg DJ, Moran JF, Levitt RG, Sagel SS. Pleural and chest wall invasion in bronchogenic carcinoma: CT evaluation. Radiology. 1985;157:191–4.
24. Bandi V, Lunn W, Ernst A, Eberhardt R, Hoffmann H, Herth FJ. Ultrasound vs. CT in detecting chest wall invasion by tumor: a prospective study. Chest. 2008;133:881–6.
25. Barlesi F, Balleyguier C, Besse B, Bonodeau F, Brenac F, Corneloup O, et al. Inter- and intraobserver consistency in assessing eligibility for bevacizumab (BVZ) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with centrally located tumors. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1682–6.
26. Glazer HS, Kaiser LR, Anderson DJ, Molina PL, Emami B, Roper CL, et al. Indeterminate mediastinal invasion in bronchogenic carcinoma: CT evaluation. Radiology. 1989;173:37–42.
27. Herman SJ, Winton TL, Weisbrod GL, Towers MJ, Mentzer SJ. Mediastinal invasion by bronchogenic carcinoma: CT signs. Radiology. 1994;190:841–6.
28. Reck M, Barlesi F, Crino L, Henschke CI, Isla D, Stiebeler S, et al. Predicting and managing the risk of pulmonary haemorrhage in patients with NSCLC treated with bevacizumab: a consensus report from a panel of experts. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1111–20.
29. de Langen AJ, Raijmakers P, Riphagen I, Paul MA, Hoekstra OS. The size of mediastinal lymph nodes and its relation with metastatic involvement: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:26–9.
30. Silvestri GA, Gould MK, Margolis ML, Tanoue LT, McCrory D, Toloza E, et al. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:178S–201S.
31. Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, Giroux DJ, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:568–77.
32. Qureshi NR, Rahman NM, Gleeson FV. Thoracic ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Thorax. 2009;64:139–43.
33. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.
34. Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O’Day S, Weber JS, Hamid O, Lebbe C, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7412–20.
35. Cervera Deval J. [RECIST and the radiologist]. Radiologia. 2014;56:193–205.
36. Chalian H, Tore HG, Horowitz JM, Salem R, Miller FH, Yaghmai V. Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST Versions 1.1 and 1.0. Radiographics. 2011;31:2093–105.
37. Lee HY, Lee KS, Ahn MJ, Hwang HS, Lee JW, Park K, et al. New CT response criteria in non-small cell lung cancer: proposal and application in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:63–9.
38. Nishino M, Jackman DM, Hatabu H, Yeap BY, Cioffredi LA, Yap JT, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison with original RECIST and impact on assessment of tumor response to targeted therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W221–8.
39. Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Van den Abbeele AD. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:281–9.
40. van Persijn van Meerten EL, Gelderblom H, Bloem JL. RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1456–67.
41. Yaghmai V, Miller FH, Rezai P, Benson AB 3rd, Salem R. Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment–using new and conventional criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:18–27.
42. Larici AR, del Ciello A, Maggi F, Santoro SI, Meduri B, Valentini V, et al. Lung abnormalities at multimodality imaging after radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Radiographics. 2011;31:771–89.
43. Linda A, Trovo M, Bradley JD. Radiation injury of the lung after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer: a timeline and pattern of CT changes. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79:147–54.
44. Rodrigues G, Lock M, D’Souza D, Yu E, Van Dyk J. Prediction of radiation pneumonitis by dose—volume histogram parameters in lung cancer–a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2004;71:127–38.
45. Decker RH, Wilson LD. Advances in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:285–90.
46. Desar IM, van Herpen CM, van Laarhoven HW, Barentsz JO, Oyen WJ, van der Graaf WT. Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:309–21.
47. Ratain MJ, Eckhardt SG. Phase II studies of modern drugs directed against new targets: if you are fazed, too, then resist RECIST. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4442–5.
48. Crabb SJ, Patsios D, Sauerbrei E, Ellis PM, Arnold A, Goss G, et al. Tumor cavitation: impact on objective response evaluation in trials of angiogenesis inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:404–10.
49. Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, Macapinlac HA, Burgess MA, Patel SR, et al. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1753–9.
50. Lee HY, Lee KS, Hwang HS, Lee JW, Ahn MJ, Park K, et al. Molecularly targeted therapy using bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study for the new CT response criteria. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11:618–26.
51. Miles KA, Lee TY, Goh V, Klotz E, Cuenod C, Bisdas S, et al. Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1430–41.
52. Li Y, Yang ZG, Chen TW, Chen HJ, Sun JY, Lu YR. Peripheral lung carcinoma: correlation of angiogenesis and first-pass perfusion parameters of 64-detector row CT. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:44–53.
53. Ma SH, Le HB, Jia BH, Wang ZX, Xiao ZW, Cheng XL, et al. Peripheral pulmonary nodules: relationship between multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging and tumor angiogenesis and VEGF expression. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:186.
54. Spira D, Neumeister H, Spira SM, Hetzel J, Spengler W, von Weyhern CH, et al. Assessment of tumor vascularity in lung cancer using volume perfusion CT (VPCT) with histopathologic comparison: a further step toward an individualized tumor characterization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37:15–21.
55. Tacelli N, Remy-Jardin M, Copin MC, Scherpereel A, Mensier E, Jaillard S, et al. Assessment of non-small cell lung cancer perfusion: pathologic-CT correlation in 15 patients. Radiology. 2010;257:863–71.
56. Fraioli F, Anzidei M, Serra G, Liberali S, Fiorelli A, Zaccagna F, et al. Whole-tumour CT-perfusion of unresectable lung cancer for the monitoring of anti-angiogenetic chemotherapy effects. Br J Radiol. 2013;86:20120174.
57. Lind JS, Meijerink MR, Dingemans AM, van Kuijk C, Ollers MC, de Ruysscher D, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in patients treated with sorafenib and erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer: a new method of monitoring treatment? Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2890–8.
58. Tacelli N, Santangelo T, Scherpereel A, Duhamel A, Deken V, Klotz E, et al. Perfusion CT allows prediction of therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer treated with conventional and anti-angiogenic chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2127–36.
59. ®). Non-small cell lung cancer. Version 3. 2014. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
60. Peters S, Adjei AA, Gridelli C, Reck M, Kerr K, Felip E. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 7:vii56–64.