|
Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 31-
|
Systematic review: Evidence is lacking to support pelvic examinations as a screening tool for non-cervical cancers or other conditions
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CANCER SCREENING;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CYTOLOGY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY;
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE;
FAMILY MEDICINE;
GYNECOLOGIST;
HUMAN;
INTERNIST;
NON CERVICAL CANCER;
OBSTETRICIAN;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
OVARY CANCER;
PAPANICOLAOU TEST;
PELVIC EXAMINATION;
PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);
SCREENING TEST;
SHORT SURVEY;
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;
UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;
FEMALE;
GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE;
GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION;
MASS SCREENING;
FEMALE;
GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE;
GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION;
HUMANS;
MASS SCREENING;
|
EID: 84922064989
PISSN: 13565524
EISSN: 14736810
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110081 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (9)
|