The mini-addenbrooke's cognitive examination: A new assessment tool for dementia

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Volumn 39, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Hsieh, Sharpley ^a,b,c,d   McGrory, Sarah ^e   Leslie, Felicity ^b   Dawson, Kate ^f   Ahmed, Samrah ^j   Butler, Chris R ^j   Rowe, James B ^f,h,i   Mioshi, Eneida ^g   Hodges, John R ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c ARC CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE IN COGNITION AND ITS DISORDERS   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^f Departments of Clinical Neurosciences   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^h Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Cognitive screening test; Corticobasal degeneration; Frontotemporal dementia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICOBASAL DEGENERATION; DEMENTIA; DEMENTIA ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; FRONTAL VARIANT FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINI ADDENBROOKE COGNITIVE EXAMINATION; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE APHASIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGY;

AGED; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84922058577     PISSN: 14208008     EISSN: 14219824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000366040     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Fields JA, Ferman TJ, Boeve BF, Smith GE: Neuropsychological assessment of patients with dementing illness. Nat Rev Neurol 2011; 7: 677-687.
2. Pigliautile M, Ricci M, Mioshi E, et al: Validation study of the Italian Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination Revised in a young-old and old-old population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2011; 32: 301-307.
3. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR: Validation of the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimers disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 36: 242-250.
4. Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR: The Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 1078-1085.
5. Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, Bonifacio A, Raimondi C, Manes F: Validation of the Spanish Version of the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R). Neurologia 2011; 26: 351-356.
6. Fang R, Wang G, Huang Y, et al: Validation of the Chinese version of Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination- Revised for screening mild Alzheimers disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 37: 223-231.
7. Larner AJ, Mitchell AJ: A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the detection of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 2014; 26: 555-563.
8. Davies RR, Dawson K, Mioshi E, Erzinclioglu S, Hodges JR: Differentiation of semantic dementia and Alzheimers disease using the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination (ACE). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008; 23: 370-375.
9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Fanjiang G: Mini-Mental State Examination: Clinical Guide. Lutz, Psychological Assessment Resources, 2001.
10. Mathew R, Bak TH, Hodges JR: Diagnostic criteria for corticobasal syndrome: a comparative study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83: 405-410.
11. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al: The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimers disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimers Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimers disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 263-269.
12. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al: Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134: 2456-2477.
13. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al: Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76: 1006-1014.
14. Watson R, van der Ark LA, Lin LC, Fieo R, Deary IJ, Meijer RR: Item response theory: how Mokken scaling can be used in clinical practice. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21: 2736-2746.
15. Loevinger J: A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychol Monogr 1947; 61:i-49.
16. Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW: Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, 2002.
17. Sijtsma K, Meijer RR, van der Ark LA: Mokken scale analysis as time goes by: an update for scaling practitioners. Pers Individ Dif 2011; 50: 31-37.
18. Ligtvoet R, van der Ark LA, Te Marvelde JM, Sijtsma K: Investigating an invariant item ordering for polytomously scored items. Educ Psychol Meas 2010; 70: 578-595.
19. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008.
20. Van der Ark LA: Mokken scale analysis in R. J Stat Softw 2007; 20: 1-19.
21. Mioshi E, Hsieh S, Savage S, Hornberger M, Hodges JR: Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2010; 74: 1591-1597.
22. Pennington C, Hodges JR, Hornberger M: Neural correlates of episodic memory in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 24: 261-268.
23. Lima-Silva TB, Bahia VS, Carvalho VA, et al: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and applicability of the Brazilian version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS). Dement Neuropsychol 2013; 7: 387-396.
24. Tang-Wai DF, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Parisi JE, Petersen RC: Pathologically confirmed corticobasal degeneration presenting with visuospatial dysfunction. Neurology 2003; 61: 1134-1135.
25. Yew B, Alladi S, Shailaja M, Hodges JR, Hornberger M: Lost and forgotten? Orientation versus memory in Alzheimers disease and frontotemporal dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2013; 33: 473-481.
26. Marra C, Quaranta D, Zinno M, et al: Clusters of cognitive and behavioral disorders clearly distinguish primary progressive aphasia from frontal lobe dementia, and Alzheimers disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2007; 24: 317-326.
27. Libon DJ, Massimo L, Moore P, et al: Screening for frontotemporal dementias and Alzheimers disease with the Philadelphia Brief Assessment of Cognition: a preliminary analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2007; 24: 441-447.
28. Benson AD, Slavin MJ, Tran TT, Petrella JR, Doraiswamy PM: Screening for early Alzheimers disease: is there still a role for the Mini-Mental State Examination? Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 7: 62-69.
29. Fillenbaum GG, Wilkinson WE, Welsh KA, Mohs RC: Discrimination between stages of Alzheimers disease with subsets of Mini-Mental State Examination items. An analysis of Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease data. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 916-921.
30. Chandler MJ, Lacritz LH, Cicerello AR, et al: Three-word recall in normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004; 26: 1128-1133.
31. Savage S, Hsieh S, Leslie F, Foxe D, Piguet O, Hodges JR: Distinguishing subtypes in primary progressive aphasia: application of the Sydney language battery. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 35: 208-218.
32. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 695-699.