Phrases or terms? the impact of different query types

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1176, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Becks, Daniela ^a   Mandl, Thomas ^a   Womser Hacker, Christa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HILDESHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Intellectual property; Patent retrieval system

Indexed keywords

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; EVALUATION; PATENT DOCUMENTS; PATENT RETRIEVAL; PRIOR ARTS; QUERY TYPES;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84922031656     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Piroi, F.: CLEF-IP 2010. Track Guidelines, 2010.
2. Information Retrieval Facility (2010): Data Collection. http://www.ir-facility.org/research/evaluation/clef-ip-10/test-collection (verified: 5.08.2010)
3. Chu, A.; Sakurai, S.; Cardenas, A.F.: Automatic Detection of Treatment Relationships for Patent Retrieval. In Proceedings of the PaIR'08 workshop, Napa Valley, California, USA, Pages: 9-14, 2008.
4. Koster, C.H.A., Beney, J.G.: Phrase-based Document Categorization revisited. In Proceedings of the PaIR'09 workshop, Hong Kong, China, 2009.
5. Ruge, G.: Wortbedeutung und Termassoziation: Methoden zur automatischen semantischen Klassifikation. Olms: Hildesheim, 1995.
6. Azzopardi, L.; Joho, H.;Vanderbauwhede, W.: A Survey on Patent Users Search Behavior, Search Functionality and System Requirements. Report: Available online: www.ir-facility.org/research/technical-reports/files/irf-tr-2010-00001.pdf
7. Becks, D.; Womser-Hacker, C.; Mandl, T.; Kölle, R.: Patent Retrieval Experiments in the Context of the CLEF IP Track 2009. In Peters, C.; Di Nunzio, G.M.; Kurimo, M.; Mandl, T.; Mostefa, D.; Penas, A.; Roda, G. (Eds.): Multilingual Information Access Evaluation I-Text Retrieval Experiments, Proceedings of CLEF 2009, Corfu, Greece, 2010 (to appear).