![]() |
Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 74-76
|
Robot assisted upper limb therapy combined with upper limb rehabilitation was at least as effective on a range of outcomes, and cost less to deliver, as an equal dose of upper limb rehabilitation alone for people with stroke
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST CONTROL;
ECONOMICS;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
KINESIOTHERAPY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY;
PROCEDURES;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REHABILITATION CENTER;
ROBOTICS;
SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
STROKE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UPPER LIMB;
VERY ELDERLY;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
COST SAVINGS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
EXERCISE THERAPY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY;
RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;
REHABILITATION CENTERS;
ROBOTICS;
SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;
STROKE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UPPER EXTREMITY;
|
EID: 84922021898
PISSN: 00450766
EISSN: 14401630
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12188 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (7)
|