Unplanned or unwanted? A randomized study of national estimates of pregnancy intentions

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1663-1670

  Moreau, Caroline ^a,b   Bohet, Aline ^b   Le Guen, Mireille ^b   Loilier, Arnaud Régnier ^c   Bajos, Nathalie ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b CENTRE FOR RESEARCH IN EPIDEMIOLOGY AND POPULATION HEALTH   (France)

^c INSTITUT NATIONAL D'ÉTUDES DÉMOGRAPHIQUES   (France)

Author keywords

France; Randomized study; Survey instrument; Unintended pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO PREGNANCY; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLING; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; UNWANTED PREGNANCY; ADOLESCENT; FRANCE; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; PREGNANCY, UNWANTED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84921965100     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert BC, Curtis K, Cabral R, et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Unintended Pregnancy Working Group. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:94-101.
2. Zabin LS. Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use-and pregnancy. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:250-1.
3. Barrett G, Wellings K. What is a "planned" pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:545-57.
4. Speizer IS, Santelli JS, Aflabe-Munsuz A, Kendall C. Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women's first and later pregnancies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004;36:198-205.
5. Bajos N, Moreau C, Leridon H, Ferrand M. Why has the number of abortions not declined in France over the past 30 years? Population and Societies 2004, no. 407. Available from: http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t-telechargement/36878/telechargement-fichier-en-pop.and.soc.english.407.pdf. Last accessed November 3, 2014.
6. Bajos N, Bohet A, Le Guen M, Moreau C. Contraception in France en 2010: new context, new practices? Population and Societies, 2012, no. 492. Available from: http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t-publication/1606/publi-pdf2-492.pdf. Last accessed November 3, 2014.
7. Rossier C. Estimating induced abortion rates: a review. Stud Fam Plann 2003;34:87-102.
8. Jones RK, Kost K. Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Stud Fam Plann 2007;38:187-97.
9. Bouyer J, Bajos N, Moreau C. Question comprehension and recall: the reporting of induced abortions in quantitative surveys on the general population. The COCON Group. Population 2004;59:439-54.
10. Vilain A. Les interruptions volontaires de grossesse en 2010. Etudes et Résultats 2012, no. 804, 1-4. Available from: http://www.drees.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/er804.pdf. Last accessed November 3, 2014.
11. Bankole A, Westoff C. The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco. J Biosoc Sci 1998;30:439-55.
12. Speizer IS, Calhoun LM, Hoke T, Sengupta R. Measurement of unmet need for family planning: longitudinal analysis of the impact of fertility desires on subsequent childbearing behaviors among urban women from Uttar Pradesh, India. Contraception 2013;88:553-60.
13. Trussell J, Vaughan B, Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:246-7. 260.
14. Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Orr MG, Finer LB, Speizer I. Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Stud Fam Plann 2009;40:87-100.
15. Moreau C, Hall K, Trussell J, Barber J. Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan. Hum Reprod 2013;28:642-50.
16. Luker KC. A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:248-9.