Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous Caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 290, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 669-676

  Sananes N ^a,b   Rodriguez, M ^a   Stora, C ^a   Pinton, A ^a   Fritz, G ^a   Gaudineau, A ^a   Aissi G ^a   Boudier, E ^a   Viville, B ^a   Favre, R ^a   Nisand, I ^a   Langer, B ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

^b Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg   (France)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Foley catheter; Induction of labour; Ocytocic; Prostaglandins; Uterine rupture

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIC AGENT;

ADULT; AMNION; CATHETER; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FRANCE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE;

ADULT; AMNION; CATHETERS; CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FRANCE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OXYTOCICS; PREGNANCY; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84921944276     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: 14320711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3287-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blondel B, Lelong N, Kermarrec M, Goffinet F, Coordination nationale des Enquêtes Nationales Périnatales (2012) Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995 and 2010: Results from the National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41(2):151–166. doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.008
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Kirmeyer S, Osterman MJ (2010) Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 58(24):1–85
3. OCDE (2011) Panorama de la santé 2011: Les indicateurs de l’OCDE, Éditions OCDE. doi:10.1787/health_glance-2011-fr
4. CNGOF (2012) Conférence de consensus du CNGOF sur l’accouchement en cas d’utérus cicatriciel. http://www.cngof.asso.fr/D_TELE/RPC_uterus_cicatriciel_2012.pdf
5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) ACOG Practice bulletin no. 11: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 116(2 Pt 1):40–63. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb21
6. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Obstet Gynecol 115(6):1279–1295. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5
7. Rossi AC, D’Addario V (2008) Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:224–231
8. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA (2003) Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 348:946–950
9. Bewley S, Cockburn J (2002) The unfacts of ‘request’ Caesarean section. BJOG 109(6):597–605
10. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, Shah A, Campodónico L, Bataglia V, Faundes A, Langer A, Narváez A, Donner A, Romero M, Reynoso S, de Pádua KS, Giordano D, Kublickas M, Acosta A (2006) Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 367(9525):1819–1829
11. Macones GA, Peipert J (2005) Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1656–1662
12. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345(1):3–8
13. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF (1996) Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl Med 335:689–695
14. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL (1991) Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 77:465–470
15. Rozenberg P (2005) The counselling of patient with prior C-section. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33(12):1003–1008
16. Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (1995) Conférence de consensus sur le déclenchement, Paris. http://www.gyneweb.fr/sources/obstetrique/consens.htm
17. Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ (2004) Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 103(1):18–23
18. Landon MB, Leindecker S (2005) The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(3 Pt 2):1016–1023
19. Ben-Aroya Z, Hallak M, Segal D, Friger M, Katz M, Mazor M (2002) Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12(1):42–45
20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (03) Vaginal birth after cesarean. http://archive.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/vbac/vbac.pdf
21. D’ercole C, Bretelle F (2007) Modalités d’accouchement en cas d’utérus cicatriciel, mécaniques et techniques obstétricales, 3rd edn. Sauramps Médical, Montpellier, France, pp 753–764
22. Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK (2000) Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(5):1176–1179
23. Landon MB, Hauth JC et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351(25):2581–2589
24. Blanchette H, Blanchette M, McCabe J, Vincent S (2001) Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1478–1484 (discussion 1484-7)
25. Wen SW, Rusen ID et al (2004) Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(4):1263–1269
26. Sanchez-Ramos L, Gaudier FL, Kaunitz AM (2000) Cervical ripening and labor induction after previous cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43(3):513–523
27. Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Lahav E, Horowitz E, Hod M, Kaplan B (2004) Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116(2):173–176
28. Locatelli A, Regalia AL, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Biffi A, Pezzullo JC (2004) Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section. BJOG 111(12):1394–1399
29. Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M (2012) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001233
30. Carbonne B, Frydman R, Goffinet F, Pierre F, Subtil D (2000) Recommandations pour la pratique Clinique du CNGOF: Cesariennes conséquences et indications. http://www.cngof.asso.fr/D_PAGES/PURPC_08.HTM
31. Haute autorité de santé (2008) Recommandations pour la pratique clinique de la Haute autorité de santé sur le déclenchement artificiel du travail à partir de 37 semaines d’aménorrhée. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/declenchement_artificiel_du_travail_-_recommandations.pdf
32. SOGC clinical practice guidelines (2005) Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89:319–331
33. ACOG (2010) Practice bulletin no. 115. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 116:450–463
34. Royal College Of obstetricians and gynecologists (2007) Birth after previous Caesarian birth. Green-Top Guideline. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/GTG4511022011.pdf