Instrument for scoring clinical outcome of research for epidermolysis bullosa: A consensus-generated clinical research tool

Pediatric Dermatology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 41-52

  Schwieger Briel, Agnes ^a   Chakkittakandiyil, Ajith ^b   Lara Corrales, Irene ^b   Aujla, Nimrita ^b   Lane, Alfred T ^c   Lucky, Anne W ^d   Bruckner, Anna L ^e,f   Pope, Elena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f Nutrition Obesity Research Center at the University of Colorado   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABNORMAL LABORATORY RESULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONSENSUS; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA DYSTROPHICA; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA SIMPLEX; FAMILY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVENTION STUDY; LEISURE; LIKERT SCALE; MOOD; MUCOSA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; PRURITUS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN; SLEEP; ADULT; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; DEVICES; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA, JUNCTIONAL; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ADULT; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHILD; CONSENSUS; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA DYSTROPHICA; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA SIMPLEX; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA, JUNCTIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUCOUS MEMBRANE; PHYSICIANS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SKIN;

EID: 84921875968     PISSN: 07368046     EISSN: 15251470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pde.12317     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fine JD, Eady RA, Bauer EA, et al. The classification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB): report of the Third International Consensus Meeting on Diagnosis and Classification of EB. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 931-950.
2. Pigors M, Kiritsi D, Krümpelmann S, et al. Lack of plakoglobin leads to lethal congenital epidermolysis bullosa. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20: 1811-1819.
3. Cassidy AJ, van Steensel MA, Steijlen PM, et al. A homozygous missense mutation in TGM5 abolishes epidermal transglutaminase 5 activity and causes acral peeling skin syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 77: 909-917.
4. Has C, Spartà G, Kiritsi D, et al. Integrin α3 mutations with kidney, lung, and skin disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1508-1514.
5. Pigors M, Schwieger-Briel A, Leppert J, et al. Molecular heterogeneity of epidermolysis bullosa simplex: contribution of EXPH5 mutations. J Invest Dermatol 2013 Sep 4. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.373 [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 24005056
6. Kho YC, Rhodes LM, Robertson S, et al. Epidemiology of epidermolysis bullosa in the antipodes: the Australasian Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry with a focus on Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 635-640.
7. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, et al. Gastrointestinal complications of inherited epidermolysis bullosa: cumulative experience of the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008; 46: 147-158.
8. Moss C, Wong A, Davies P,. The Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity score: development and validation. Br J Dermatol 2009; 160: 1057-1065.
9. Tamai K, Hashimoto I, Hanada K, et al. Japanese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of junctional and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Arch Dermatol Res 2003; 295: 24-28.
10. van Stralen MM, Lechner L, Mudde AN, et al. Determinants of awareness, initiation and maintenance of physical activity among the over-fifties: a Delphi study. Health Educ Res 2010; 25: 233-247.
11. Meyrick D,. The Delphi method and health research. Health Educ 2003; 103: 7-16.
12. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H,. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32: 1008-1015.
13. Dillman DA, Smyth J, Christian LM,. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
14. Likert R,. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932; 140: 1-55.
15. Norman G,. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ 2010; 15: 625-632.
16. Carifio J, Perla R,. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1150-1152.
17. Jamieson S,. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1217-1218.
18. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE,. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-1288.
19. Tabolli S, Sampogna F, Di Pietro C, et al. Quality of life in patients with epidermolysis bullosa. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 869-877.
20. Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN,. Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in Web and paper surveys. Res Higher Educ 2003; 44: 409-432.
21. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL,. A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 2000; 60: 821-836.
22. van Scheppingen C, Lettinga AT, Duipmans JC, et al. Main problems experienced by children with epidermolysis bullosa: a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Acta Derm Venereol 2008; 88: 143-150.
23. Horn HM, Tidman MJ,. Quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa. Clin Exp Dermatol 2002; 27: 707-710.