Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 86-92

  Pithon, Matheus Melo ^a   Dos Santos, Elinailton Silva ^b  

^a Southwest State University of Bahia UESB   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO SUDOESTE DA BAHIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Information; Internet; Orthognathic surgery; Pain

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; READING; STANDARDS; WEB BROWSER;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; READING; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84921870674     PISSN: 21769451     EISSN: 21776709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cooper CP, Mallon KP, Leadbetter S, Pollack LA, Peipins LA. Cancer Internet search activity on a major search engine, United States 2001-2003. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(3):e36.
2. Ressler PK, Bradshaw YS, Gualtieri L, Chui KK. Communicating the experience of chronic pain and illness through blogging. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e143.
3. Searching Online for Health Information. 2012 [Cited: 2013 Jul 12]. Available from: http://healthin30.com/2012/12/searching-online-for-health-information.
4. Cooley DL, Mancuso AM, Weiss LB, Coren JS. Health-related Internet use among patients of osteopathic physicians. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(8):473-82.
5. Eysenbach G, Kohler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002;324:573-7.
6. Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(3):500-6.
7. Moretti FA, Oliveira VE, Silva EM. Access to health information on the internet: a public health issue? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2012;58(6):650-8.
8. Anhoj J, Jensen AH. Using the internet for life style changes in diet and physical activity: a feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e28.
9. Walsh AM, Hyde MK, Hamilton K, White KM. Predictive modelling: parents’ decision making to use online child health information to increase their understanding and/or diagnose or treat their child’s health. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:144.
10. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e162.
11. Chegini S, Johnston KD, Kalantzis A, Dhariwal DK. The effect of anesthetic technique on recovery after orthognathic surgery: a retrospective audit. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(2):69-74.
12. Phillips C, Blakey G 3rd, Jaskolka M. Recovery after orthognathic surgery: short-term health-related quality of life outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(10):2110-5.
13. Dujoncquoy JP, Ferri J, Raoul G, Kleinheinz J. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Head Face Med. 2010 Nov 17;6:27.
14. Kavin T, Jagadesan AG, Venkataraman SS. Changes in quality of life and impact on patients’ perception of esthetics after orthognathic surgery. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4:S290-3.
15. Kim KS, Kim KN, Hwang KG, Park CJ. Capsicum plaster at the Hegu point reduces postoperative analgesic requirement after orthognathic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):992-6.
16. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004274.
17. Margariti M, Papadimitriou GN. [Use of informatics technology in psychiatry]. Psychiatrike. 2012;23:322-33.
18. Bernstam EV, Walji MF, Sagaram S, Sagaram D, Johnson CW, Meric-Bernstam F. Commonly cited website quality criteria are not effective at identifying inaccurate online information about breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(6):1206-13.
19. Gagliardi A, Jadad AR. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ. 2002;324(7337):569-73.
20. Grewal P, Williams B, Alagaratnam S, Neffendorf J, Soobrah R. Quality of vascular surgery Web sites on the Internet. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(5):1461-7.
21. Oermann MH. Using health web sites for patient education. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2003;30(4):217-23.
22. Patel U, Cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(2):e103-9.
23. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700.
24. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(5):e55.
25. Kerr C, Murray E, Stevenson F, Gore C, Nazareth I. Internet interventions for long-term conditions: patient and caregiver quality criteria. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e13.
26. Search Engine Watch. 2013. [Cited: 2013 14 Feb.] Available from: http://www.searchenginewatch.com.
27. Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre GT. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:466-9.
28. Soobrah R, Clark SK. Your patient information website: how good is it? Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e90-4.