The publication and reproducibility challenges of shared data

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 59-61

  Poldrack, Russell A ^a   Poline, Jean Baptiste ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive neuroscience; Data sharing; FMRI; Meta analysis; Publication

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCES; DATA SHARING; FMRI; META ANALYSIS; PUBLICATION;

BIOLOGY;

DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROIMAGING; NOTE; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); NEUROSCIENCE; PROCEDURES; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; DATASETS AS TOPIC; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; NEUROSCIENCES; PUBLISHING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84921849573     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.008     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005, 2:e124.
2. Button K.S., et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14:365-376.
3. Carp J. On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of fMRI experiments. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6. Published online October 11, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149.
4. Poline J-B., et al. Data sharing in neuroimaging research. Front. Neuroinform. 2012, 6. Published online April 5, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2012.00009.
5. Poldrack R.A., Gorgolewski K.J. Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17:1510-1517.
6. Wicherts J.M., et al. Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e26828.
7. Simmons J.P., et al. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 22:1359-1366.
8. Poldrack R.A., et al. Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 40:409-414.
9. Carp J. The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature. Neuroimage 2012, 63:289-300.
10. Gavish M., Donoho D. A universal identifier for computational results. Procedia Comp. Sci. 2011, 4:637-647.
11. Rohlfing T., Poline J-B. Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline. Neuroimage 2012, 59:4189-4195.
12. Gorgolewski K.J., et al. Making data sharing count: a publication-based solution. Front. Neurosci. 2013, 7. Published online February 6, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00009.