Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 258-264

  Young, Jane ^a,b,c   Badgery Parker, Tim ^a,c   Dobbins, Timothy ^a   Jorgensen, Mikaela ^a   Gibbs, Peter ^d   Faragher, Ian ^e   Jones, Ian ^f   Currow, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b CANCER INSTITUTE NSW   (Australia)

^c SYDNEY LOCAL HEALTH DISTRICT   (Australia)

^d WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^e WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

ASA; ECOG WHO performance; Risk adjustment; status statistical models

Indexed keywords

AGED; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS SCORE; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EASTERN COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; RECTUM CANCER; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; AUSTRALIA; CALIBRATION; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FACTUAL DATABASE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; AUSTRALIA; CALIBRATION; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PROGNOSIS; RISK ADJUSTMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84921833711     PISSN: 08853924     EISSN: 18736513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Australasian clinical indicator report: 2001-2008. Determining the potential to improve quality of care 2008 Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Sydney
2. M.M. Center, A. Jemal, R.A. Smith, and E. Ward Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer CA Cancer J Clin 59 2009 366 378
3. M.R. Habib, M.J. Solomon, and J.M. Young Evidence-based and clinical outcome scores to facilitate audit and feedback for colorectal cancer care Dis Colon Rectum 52 2009 616 622
4. J.L. Malin, A.M. Schneider, J.A. Epstein, J.E. Ezekiel, and K.L. Kahn Results of the national initiative for cancer care quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol 24 2006 626 634
5. D. Schrag Enhancing cancer registry data to promote rational health system design J Natl Cancer Inst 100 2008 378 379
6. J. Daley, S.F. Khuri, and W. Henderson Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study J Am Coll Surg 185 1997 328 340
7. L.I. Iezzoni Using risk-adjusted outcomes to assess clinical-practice - an overview of issues pertaining to risk adjustment Ann Thorac Surg 58 1994 1822 1826
8. M. Extermann, J. Overcash, G.H. Lyman, J. Parr, and L. Balducci Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients J Clin Oncol 16 1998 1582 1587
9. M.M. Oken, R.H. Creech, and D.C. Tormey Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Am J Clin Oncol 5 1982 649 655
10. National Committee on Vital Health and Statistics. Classifying and reporting vital statistics. Available at: http://ncvhs.hhs.gov/010617rp.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014.
11. J.M. Young, M. Jorgensen, T. Dobbins, and M.J. Solomon The quality and usefulness of the NSW Clinical Cancer Registry Minimum Dataset and Colorectal Dataset Extension for colorectal cancer services research. CESR Technical Report 1 2012 University of Sydney Sydney
12. W.D. Owens, J.A. Felts, and E.L. Spitznagel ASA physical status classifications - study of consistency of ratings Anesthesiology 49 1978 239 243
13. R. Mayr, M. May, and T. Martini Predictive capacity of four comorbidity indices estimating perioperative mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder BJU Int 110 2012 E222 E227
14. R.B. Merriel, P. Gibbs, T.J. O'Brien, and M. Hibbert BioGrid Australia facilitates collaborative medical and bioinformatics research across hospitals and medical research institutes by linking data from diverse disease and data types Hum Mutat 32 2011 517 525
15. J.W. Dekker, G.A. Gooiker, and L.G. van der Geest Use of different comorbidity scores for risk-adjustment in the evaluation of quality of colorectal cancer surgery: does it matter? Eur J Surg Oncol 38 2012 1071 1078
16. N.C. Davis, E.B. Evans, J.R. Cohen, and D.E. Theile Staging of colorectal cancer. The Australian clinico-pathological staging (ACPS) system compared with Dukes' system Dis Colon Rectum 27 1984 707 713
17. D. Altman Practical statistics for medical research 1991 Chapman & Hall London, UK
18. M.E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K.L. Ales, and C.R. Mackenzie A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal-studies - development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 1987 373 383
19. V. Sundararajan, T. Henderson, and C. Perry New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality J Clin Epidemiol 57 2004 1288 1294