Current Scenario of Vitamin D Status During Pregnancy in North Indian Population

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 93-100

  Sharma, Sheetal ^a   Kumar, Ashok ^a,c   Prasad, Sudha ^a   Sharma, Shashi ^b  

^a MAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^b INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND PREVENTIVE ONCOLOGY   (India)

^c NONE   (India)

Author keywords

Calcium; Pregnancy; Prevalence; Vitamin D

Indexed keywords

25 HYDROXYVITAMIN D; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CALCIUM; HEMOGLOBIN; PHOSPHATE; SERUM ALBUMIN;

ADULT; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; CALCIUM BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INDIAN; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL SERUM; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PHOSPHATE BLOOD LEVEL; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREVALENCE; PRIMIGRAVIDA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL STATUS; VITAMIN BLOOD LEVEL; VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY;

EID: 84921833305     PISSN: 09719202     EISSN: 09756434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0658-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Harinarayan CV, Joshi SR. Vitamin D status in India-its implications and remedial measures. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:40–8.
2. Hollick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(266–281):3.
3. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1911–30.
4. Javaid M, Crozier S, Harvey N, et al. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at 9 years: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2006;367:36–43.
5. Sachan A, Gupta R, Das V. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their new borns in northern India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:1060–4.
6. Judkins A, Eagleton C. Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant New Zealand women. N Z Med J. 2006;119:4227 (U2144 Nutrients 2012).
7. Shibata M, Suzuki A, Sekiya T, et al. High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in pregnant Japanese women with threatened premature delivery. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011;29:615–20.
8. Van Der Meer IM, Karamali NS, Boeke AJ, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant non-western women in the Hague, The Netherlands. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:350–3.
9. Dasgupta A, Saikia UK, Sarma D. Status of 25(OH) D levels in pregnancy: a study from the North Eastern part of India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(Suppl 2):S405–7.
10. Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Winder NR, et al. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and body composition and cardiovascular risk markers in Indian children: the Mysore Parthenon study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(3):628–35.
11. Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Chopra S, et al. Vitamin D status in pregnant Indian women across trimesters and different seasons and its correlation with neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Br J Nutr. 2011;106:1383–9.
12. Harinarayan CV, AlokSachan P, Amaresh Reddy KM, et al. Vitamin D status and bone mineral density in women of reproductive and postmenopausal age groups: A cross-sectional study from South India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2011;59:695–701.
13. Aghajafari Fariba, Nagulesapillai Tharsiya, Ronksley PE, et al. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2013;346:1169.
14. Ravi Kumar BP, Dudala SR, Rao AR. Kuppuswamy’s Socio-economic status scale—a revision of economic parameter for 2012. IJDRH. 2013;1:2–4.
15. Milman N, Hvas AM, Bergholt T, et al. Vitamin D status during normal pregnancy and postpartum. A longitudinal study in 141 Danish women. J Perinat Med. 2011;40:57–61.
16. Babu US, Calvo MS. Modern India and the vitamin D dilemma: evidence for the need of a national food fortification program. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54:1134–47.
17. Dror DK. Vitamin D status during pregnancy: maternal, fetal, and postnatal outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:422–6.
18. Dror DK, Allen LH. Vitamin D inadequacy in pregnancy: biology, outcomes, and interventions. Nutr Rev. 2010;68:465–77.