Sustainable chemical engineering: Dealing with "wicked" sustainability problems

AIChE Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3998-4007

  Azapagic, Adisa ^a   Perdan, Slobodan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Energy; Life cycle thinking; Sustainable chemical engineering; Systems approach; Wicked problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921832102     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14650     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Cohen C. The early history of chemical engineering: a reassessment. Br J History Sci. 1996;29:171-194.
2. Perkins JD. Chemical engineering: the first 100 years. In: Darton RC, Prince RGH, Wood DG, eds. Chemical Engineering: Visions of the World. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2003:11-40.
3. Hougen OA. Seven decades of chemical engineering. Chem Eng Prog. 1977;57:89.
4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013-The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
5. United Nations Environment Programme. GEO-5, Global Environmental Outlook-Environment for the Future We Want. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environmental Programme; 2012.
6. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2012 Revision. New York, NY: United Nations; 2014.
7. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Ageing 2013. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2013.
8. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2012.
9. United Nations Environment Programme. Keeping Track of Our Changing Environment: From Rio to Rio+20 (1992-2012). Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme; 2011.
10. United Nations (UN)-HABITAT. Cities and Climate Change Initiative Launch and Conference Report. Oslo, Norway: 2009.
11. World Bank. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2010.
12. Food and Agriculture Organization. Current World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2011/12. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2008.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization. Livestock Impacts on the Environment. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2006.
14. Fiala N. Meeting the demand: an estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production. Ecol Econ. 2008;67:412-419.
15. United Nations Environment Programme. The Environmental Food Crisis-The Environment's Role in Averting Future Food Crises. Arendal, Norway: United Nations Environment Programme; 2009.
16. Food and Agriculture Organisation Statistics (FAOSTAT). World livestock production in 2012. http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/browse/Q/QL/E. Accessed 2014.
17. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems 2012;15:401.
18. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2013. Paris, France: International Energy Agency; 2013.
19. Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Eisenmenger N. Growth in global materials use: GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecol Econ. 2009;68:2696-2705.
20. Hunt A, Farmer TJ, Clark JH. Elemental sustainability and the importance of scarce element recovery. In: Hunt A, ed. Elemental Recovery and Sustainability. London, United Kingdom: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2013;1-28.
21. Hudson C, van Schaik A, Heiskanen K, Meskers C, Hagelüken C. Metal Recycling: Opportunities, Limits, Infrastructure. A Report of the Working Group on the Global Metal Flows to the International Resource Panel. Reuter, MA: United Nations Environment Programme; 2013.
22. Institution of Chemical Engineers. Chemical Engineering Futures-The Health & Wellbeing Challenge. Rugby, United Kingdom: Institution of Chemical Engineers; 2012.
23. United Nations Environment Programme. Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels. Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme; 2009.
24. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 1973;4(2):155-169.
25. Conklin J. Wicked problems and social complexity. In: Conklin J, ed. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2006:1-20.
26. Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY, eds. Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. London, United Kingdom: Earthscan; 2010.
27. Roberts N. Coping With Wicked Problems. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School Department of Strategic Management; 2000.
28. Bakshi BR, Fiskel J. The quest for sustainability: challenges for process systems engineering. AIChE J. 2003;49:1350-1358.
29. Azapagic A, Perdan S. Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Process Safety Environ Protection 2000;78(B4):243-261.
30. Azapagic A, Clift R. Life cycle assessment and linear programming-environmental optimisation of product system. Comp Chem Eng. 1995;19:229-234.
31. Azapagic A, Clift R. The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation. Comp Chem Eng. 1999;23:1509-1526.
32. Pistikopoulos EN. Design and operations of sustainable and environmentally benign processes. Comp Chem Eng. 1999;23:1363.
33. Ecoinvent Centre. Ecoinvent. Ecoinvent Database v2.2. St Gallen, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; 2010.
34. PE International. GaBi Software. Stuttgart, Germany: PE International; 2014.
35. PRé Consultants. SimaPro Software. The Netherlands: PRé Consultants; 2014.
36. Institution of Chemical Engineers. The Sustainability Metrics Recommended for Use in the Process Industries. Rugby, United Kingdom: Institution of Chemical Engineers; 2002.
37. AIChE. Sustainability index. http://www.aiche.org/ifs/resources/sustainability-index. Accessed 2008.
38. United Nations Environment Programme. Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf. Accessed 2009.
39. ISO. Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework. London, United Kingdom: 2006.
40. Liu Z, Huang Y. Technology evaluation and decision making for sustainability enhancement of industrial systems under uncertainty. AIChE J. 2012;58:1841-1852.
41. Azapagic A, Clift R. Life cycle assessment and multiobjective optimisation. J Cleaner Prod. 1999;7(2):135-143.
42. Hugo A, Ciumei C, Buxton A, Pistikopoulos EN. Environmental impact minimisation through material substitution: a multi-objective optimisation approach. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2003;14:683-688.
43. Grossmann IE, Guillén-Gosálbez G. Scope for the application of mathematical programming techniques in the synthesis and planning of sustainable processes. Comp Chem Eng. 2010;34(9):1365-1376.
44. Čuček L, Klemeš JJ, Kravanja Z. Accessing direct and indirect effects within a LCA based multiobjective synthesis of bioproducts supply chains. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2012;31:1065-1069.
45. Santibañez-Aguilar JE, González-Campos JB, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-González M, El-Halwagi MM. Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives. J Cleaner Prod. 2014;65:270-294.
46. Stamford L, Azapagic A. Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation options for the UK. Research Int J Energ Res. 2012;36:1263-1290.
47. Yue D, You F, Snyder SW. Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: overview, key issues and challenges. Comp Chem Eng. 2014;66:36-56.
48. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Food and Agriculture Organization. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2010-2019. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/newsroom/docs/ENGLISH_outlook.pdf. Accessed 2010.
49. Department for Transport. Carbon and Sustainability Reporting Within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation Requirements and Guidance. London, United Kingdom: Department for Transport; 2008.
50. Stichnothe H, Azapagic A. Bioethanol from waste: life cycle estimation of the greenhouse gas saving potential. Resour Conservation Recycling 2009;53:624-630.
51. Jeswani HK, Azapagic A. Methodologies for assessing the impacts of water use: a review and a case study. J Cleaner Prod. 2011;19(12):1288-1299.
52. Food and Agriculture Organization. Price Volatility and Food Security. A Report of the High Level of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2011.
53. Webster B. Dirty secrets of "cleanest yet" diesel cars. The Sunday Times, April 5 2014.
54. Kelly F. Health Impacts of PM2.5 from Diesel Vehicles. London, United Kingdom: Committee on Air Pollution, Department of Health, King's College London; 2014.
55. Falano TH, Jeswani, Azapagic A. Assessing the environmental sustainability of ethanol from integrated biorefineries. Biotechnol J. 2014;9(6);753-765.
56. Mencken HL. A Mencken chrestomathy. New York: Knopf; 1949; p 627.